Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 277
  • Views 22.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • do or die
    do or die

    No more bunk about how we just couldn't incorporate Bowman into our O, please.  New guy at R, almost matched Bowman's season production....in his first half, in the CFL.

  • Wanna-B-Fanboy
    Wanna-B-Fanboy

    I'm said Idiot.   I have it in my signature to remind me that you are not a voluntarily obtuse assclown-troll who posts in a manner akin to a snide-ass backhand complimenting, fact denying,

  • blitzmore
    blitzmore

    They have some decent looking receivers on the practice roster. This talk that they NEVER bring in good receivers is ridiculous.

comment_343727

0-0 in 3 games now i believe and I dont think he is being double-teamed.

Need to put somebody in, Flanders, Thompkins or whoever.

Heck, Bakari Grant will be a better pickup right now, if we need a 3rd vet receiver. Put up a quiet 1000+ receiving yards last year.

https://www.cfl.ca/players/bakari-grant/158240/

Edited by M.O.A.B.

  • Author
comment_343755
1 hour ago, M.O.A.B. said:

0-0 in 3 games now i believe and I dont think he is being double-teamed.

Need to put somebody in, Flanders, Thompkins or whoever.

Heck, Bakari Grant will be a better pickup right now, if we need a 3rd vet receiver. Put up a quiet 1000+ receiving yards last year.

https://www.cfl.ca/players/bakari-grant/158240/

Flanders practiced last week iirc. Would love to see thompkins. And yeah using grant to start an extra NI would be great. 

 

comment_343885

I like Bowman I think he sticks around... I think he'll be useful at some point... that being said, I wouldn't be too upset if he "tweaked" something in the Argo game and finds himself on the 1-game... I'd put in Thompkins or Flanders to give some other guys some opportunities before we just go ahead and dump him... 

People pointing out that Demski play the "Flanders role" now is irrelevant... we are a run first team... and all of Flander, Harris, and Demski are also proficient pass catchers... having more "swiss-army knife" weapons on the field only makes our offense better.... 

comment_343886
13 hours ago, Goalie said:

I'd go Flanders and if need be use Peterman more. 

I feel we are a running team and need to keep doing that. Flanders is just another weapon to use. 

 

Adams Dressler Demski Peterman Wolitarsky? Why not. 

I thought Flanders played fairly well as a starting slot last year. I would be happy to see him there again.

We could create some excellent chaos having Harris, Flanders, Demski and potentially Streveler all on the field together.

comment_343887
15 minutes ago, bearpants said:

I like Bowman I think he sticks around... I think he'll be useful at some point... that being said, I wouldn't be too upset if he "tweaked" something in the Argo game and finds himself on the 1-game... I'd put in Thompkins or Flanders to give some other guys some opportunities before we just go ahead and dump him... 

People pointing out that Demski play the "Flanders role" now is irrelevant... we are a run first team... and all of Flander, Harris, and Demski are also proficient pass catchers... having more "swiss-army knife" weapons on the field only makes our offense better.... 

Our O has played it's best with Flanders in the lineup... The guy has done nothing but produce when he's been on the field. You make room for a guy like that.

comment_343925
1 hour ago, TBURGESS said:

Demski is taking the Flanders role and is a NI. IF we replace Bowman, I'd go with a young receiver, not Flanders. 

I agree and I would like to see Thompkins in the line up... but I would argue that "young receiver" also describes Flanders... also, Flanders is younger than Thompkins (same age as Washington)...

Create an account or sign in to comment