Yourface

Unfortunately, I think more sports teams fall under that category than we would like to think. See Artemi Panarin's recent sexual assault case for example. Superstars seem to be able to get away with that kind of behaviour consistently.

$$$$ will buy you anything 

Not trying to be an ass, just clarifying what your position is on MOS. You think he should be fired. That's your opinion and you are welcome to it. Just so that it is clear to me, and everyone else, what the motivation for your criticism is, I do not feel Osh is the sole reason for our success at all, far from it. I just feel we would not be able to upgrade on him and I feel he and Walters have done an excellent job together in building quality football teams. 
If you think MOS's time has expired with our team, that certainly is a possibility. I just don't believe that a coach necessarily has an expiry date. I believe players do and that the coach needs to recognize that, but I also can see the logic in a coach being loyal to guys and how that can help the locker room and recruitment/retention. Either way it's a balancing act for sure, but one that can be maintained even if the scale tips one way or the other occasionally. At the end of the day, the players still speak glowingly of him, play very hard and disciplined for him, and the culture and locker room is strong. I guess I'm not seeing the end of the road yet, as you are. That's not me being chicken little or in denial, that's just my opinion based off results year over year. You see some mistakes he is making and think they outweigh the positives, I see mistakes he is making and think they do not outweigh the positives, there really is no definitive winner of this argument. It's solely opinion on both our parts and we are both entitled to them is all I'm saying. Neither of us can prove each other wrong, nor do I feel the need to do so on my part. You will bring up the negatives of MOS, I will bring up the positives, it's the ying and the yang of this forum's discussion about him I guess.

Collaros, the receivers and Lucky are the biggest reasons for this loss 

You know... you can use the mute function to ignore that, right? 
 

Doesn’t matter if toe was in. The talon landed on the white stripe. Lawler was a little nonchalant on that reception.

I will echo everyone’s sentiments here. Special teams were sub-par but otherwise a rock solid game from everyone.

Lawler’s offside was incredibly obvious. No referee would have let that go. By your standards, Demski would be called for offside multiple times per game.

Now don't be ******* and go for 2 

And watery vanilla at that.

This team is so vanilla.

Lawler’s offside was incredibly obvious. No referee would have let that go. By your standards, Demski would be called for offside multiple times per game.

Thanks champ.

Zachy boy had lots of time there

Why does Lucky always run straight into the cluster **** of bodies instead of trying to kick it out wide?

Lmao now you’re lying to yourself. You know who was trashing the officiating two weeks ago after the Bombers win against Hamilton? Tiger-Cats fans of course. It’s always the fans of the losing team trashing the refs, on every game day in every sport and it’s ridiculous. There is zero objectivity coming from you or most people on this board seemingly.

Interesting take. I don’t see any evidence that Wilson crossed the line, personally. Maybe he did, but I don’t see how it could have been overturned based on the video we saw. 🤷 
I understand where you are coming from. Perhaps I got a little agressive in defending my point of view.

Ok I had to look at the second angle you mentioned about 10 times (the first angle is somewhat useless), but I think you’re right. That may very well be a botched call by the Command Centre.

Interesting take. I don’t see any evidence that Wilson crossed the line, personally. Maybe he did, but I don’t see how it could have been overturned based on the video we saw. 🤷 
I understand where you are coming from. Perhaps I got a little agressive in defending my point of view.

Interesting take. I don’t see any evidence that Wilson crossed the line, personally. Maybe he did, but I don’t see how it could have been overturned based on the video we saw. 🤷 
I understand where you are coming from. Perhaps I got a little agressive in defending my point of view.

“I don’t watch- but I have a hard time believing” = “Arguing with integrity”
Poster of the year.

Lmao now you’re lying to yourself. You know who was trashing the officiating two weeks ago after the Bombers win against Hamilton? Tiger-Cats fans of course. It’s always the fans of the losing team trashing the refs, on every game day in every sport and it’s ridiculous. There is zero objectivity coming from you or most people on this board seemingly.

Ok so is Migs back...or has Nate finally resurfaced??

Yourface is an Argo fan?!
Gawwwwddddd.
So there you have it, we've identified the total fan base of the Argos: Yourface and Bluto.
I know I know, I'm here all week.

It's what fans do.  If it wasn't officiating it would be something else.  As was mentioned earlier, the last memory of this game was a controversial call so that stands out and ends up being the main talking point.  If that one play wasn't as close as it was, I don't think we'd be talking about it this much.  We'd be talking about Buck's play calling or our o-line play ( both of which were getting roasted during this game).  There's never a shortage of complaints to be made.