Jump to content

Mike

Administrators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mike

  1. Mike replied to Zontar's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    They’ll be undefeated for two years
  2. Mike replied to Zontar's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    The on field product this year is absolutely trash. If I wasn’t so hooked on the CFL because being a fan has been ingrained in me over many many years, I’d hate it. That rule to protect the punter is horrendous. Soon enough, someone will just start kicking on the run and get tagged every time and his team will never lose the ball. What a dumb rule. You literally can’t defend anything anymore.
  3. Mike replied to Zontar's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    ... is this really worth complaining about?
  4. That’s not freelancing though ... freelancing suggests he plays outside the game plan and doesn’t follow his assignments, whereas having the freedom to do that (if true) would be part of the game plan.
  5. I’m really curious how you know with such certainty that Jefferson goes off script
  6. You’d think Ripper would be a huge Nichols to SSK backer since that whole roster is so elite that all they need is a QB who won’t lose games for them.
  7. Mike replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I’m gonna go with Andrew Harris
  8. Lol what? You’re literally just using QB buzzwords here. Nichols has strengths as a QB but this just makes you sound clueless.
  9. Mitchell, Reilly, Masoli, Harris
  10. Mike replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I’m going to go with Don Jackson this week
  11. The problem with saying it’s luck is that people don’t realize it’s by design. Our defense operates differently in the red zone than they do when they’ve got a whole field behind them. It’s not luck that we’ve given up one major in two games. I don’t even necessarily like it. But it’s the way our D runs and it works.
  12. I noticed this too.
  13. Lucky, our DL and our kick cover teams.
  14. Honestly if that’s a nice throw, Matthews waltzes into the end zone. He shorted it and let a dwarf catch up to a wide open 13 who got handed a brain full of turf for his troubles
  15. Started off hot? He threw one sort of good ball to Whitehead.
  16. It’s weird because last year we were complaining that Streveler looked like he was handcuffed trying to run a Nichols style offense. This year its almost like they’re running something Streveler would be best suited to, but for Nichols. And he can’t do it. and also he sucks.
  17. Nichols is so bad. SO bad.
  18. Imagine I told you before the game that Adams, Matthews and Wolitarsky combined for one catch and we won.
  19. Fenner and Nichols both awful and both big reasons why Edmonton is still even remotely in this.
  20. What’s your point
  21. Are you kidding lol
  22. I mean, a bad play call isn’t an excuse for not being able to hit wide open receivers
  23. “Nichols throws it to Ellingson ... oops sorry I mean Wolartersky”
  24. Nichols is SO bad today
  25. Hate to nitpick but did you ever watch Waggoner play in college? Because people who did (Buono) wanted him even before he was Canadian. So many people forget this guy was on a negotiation list with the Lions before he ever was confirmed as a non import.