Jump to content

Mike

Administrators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mike

  1. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I get the complaints about Miller but one I don't understand is why people think a statement like "football decisions will be made with my approval" (or whatever he said) is out of line. He's the CEO. They rubber stamp all decisions. This isn't new. Some of you just don't like it because he's brash and blunt about it.
  2. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    If he gets a real good solid staff around him I don't see why he can't be successful. He's a smart guy and his team mates all said he was a hell of a leader, but he's such an unknown as a coach right now just really looks bad and is a big gamble. I think I'd be much more open to that gamble if it hadn't been such a **** show the last few years. Khari Jones with a sock-puppet of a GM being prodded by a highly "motivated" CEO is not a good situation. Wade should hire a quality football man and then get the firetruck out of football ops. Work on biz development and revenue streams.
  3. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    If he gets a real good solid staff around him I don't see why he can't be successful. He's a smart guy and his team mates all said he was a hell of a leader, but he's such an unknown as a coach right now just really looks bad and is a big gamble. I think I'd be much more open to that gamble if it hadn't been such a **** show the last few years. Totally agree, but a lot of the candidates would be a gamble at this point. I want to like the idea of Khari as a head coach but I'm just not sure.
  4. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    To be fair, if Khari surrounded himself with a proper staff then he could be quite successful here. He fits the bill of what I want, I just don't like the optics.
  5. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I think you're overreacting. Dickenson didn't say he doesn't like Winnipeg, he said he's not interested in leaving Calgary.
  6. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Alex Hall sure did but he's not here anymore. Other than that... You think Alex Hall improved while he was here? I don't. Two years and he was an elite pass rusher from the day he got here but nobody ever figured out how to correct his inability to stay onside. Not a major issue in the grand scheme of things, but the weak part of his game was never addressed by these coaches.
  7. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Going back and forth with Penton on Twitter ... He said Burke was "doomed" with the roster Mack gave him. I still stand by the fact that the import talent may not have been great, but Burke did absolutely nothing to turn those guys into better players. I'll ask the question here, same as I asked Penton because I'm curious. Can anyone name an import player who actually improved with time during Tim Burke's stay as HC?
  8. Mike replied to Atomic's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Thank the lord
  9. Mike replied to Noeller's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Because Bombers.
  10. That has nothing to do with what you said though. You're more than welcome to be negative about this situation, I have my reservations as well. Being welcome to your opinion doesn't give you a free pass to use awful reasoning to back it up.
  11. Just out of curiosity, why would the position a player played on the field have any bearing on their abilities as a front office guy? Are you suggesting a QB would make a better president than a long snapper just because they played a more glamorous position? The football background relevancy comes from being around a team, it's leaders, seeing the day to day operations and what may work / may not. It doesn't come from where you lined up on the field.
  12. Mike replied to Noeller's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    ... I suppose it could work IF the new head coach is OK with it. That's a big if in my mind though.
  13. I am legitimately shocked and taken completely aback by this unexpected news.
  14. Mike replied to Mark H.'s post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I hope Calgary wins in Regina, just to infuriate the Rider faithful. Plus Glenn deserves a ring.
  15. Mike replied to gbill2004's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I doubt Whyte wants to come where kickers go to die (or whatever he said)
  16. Mike replied to TrueBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Unnecessary and a bad deal for both teams.
  17. Mike replied to TrueBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    There's a week in there for deals.
  18. I will not buy season tickets. Which in the grand scheme of things means nothing, but that's how defeated I would personally feel.
  19. Owens last year was bullshit, shoulda been Ray as the argos nominee then too cause without Ray Owens is not nearly as impressive a player. Ray makes everyone on offence better... but Owens was doing 3K yards before Ray. and his 3 X 3K in a row was/is unprecedented in pro football. Fair enough but it's not the MOPBOTS
  20. Mike replied to TrueBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    To me the top priority is a QB. I don't care what it takes. It needs to happen.
  21. Mike replied to Noeller's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Funny I think January is over rated league wide just by being the best of a bad bunch here. He's not as solid as his reputation suggests. it is funny you think that, yup.. But he's right.
  22. Thats ludicrous! Edmonton fired their coach. Yeah, but maybe they got in shat for it.
  23. Not a snowball's chance in hell. But congrats to him for getting the eastern nod
  24. Mike replied to Rids's post in a topic in General Discussion
    I don't care if a ref feels like a player could have let up. If it's a clean hit, I don't care if he steamrolled the guy and absolutely buried him. Football is a contact sport at every level, I hate that we're getting to a point where every level of football has officials calling penalties on clean hits that look "too rough".
  25. Mike replied to Noeller's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    He can try but for the most part, that type of accolade would result in a bump in base salary but not much towards the total max value of a contract.