January 24, 20169 yr comment_179808 With one year contracts now being the standard, it's difficult to see how throwing big money at a player with NFL ambitions or best in position is a smart solution to any problems. Receive one year of production and face the same problem retaining or filling the hole they leave behind the next year. With half the players testing free agency, retaining the best is a difficult task as long as there are a few desperate teams looking for a rebuild every year that are willing to throw money around. Westerman, should be watching the bidding war for Laurent with his eyes wide open this year as he has the opportunity to become the highest paid D-lineman in the CFL by next year.
January 24, 20169 yr comment_179825 2 hours ago, rebusrankin said: I'd prefer Kenny Stafford over Grant in the taller receiver category. 6'3", 205, and 25 yo. Yeah, he'd be a nice target for Willy. It would be good to get him away from the Eskies too. The point is, we need some size. I'd like to see us throwing around somebody else's DBs like rag-dolls for a change. Edited January 24, 20169 yr by J5V
January 24, 20169 yr comment_179828 I would love to have Stafford here, probably a little contract friendly too. He had some good games last year and would be a welcome addition.
January 24, 20169 yr comment_179830 3 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Correct, they are taking care of the 100m deficit. Did they announce the money figures from last season yet? If you are referring to the stadium, then that is not a deficit. It could become a deficit if the stadium falls down or something, but is not a deficit at this point and time because the Bomber's share of the stadium has to be considered an asset. One could make the argument that the interest is a deficit, I suppose, if you were to argue that the stadium represents no earning potential. Edited January 24, 20169 yr by gcn11
January 24, 20169 yr comment_179841 Lawless tweeting chick to ticats pretty much a done deal. Im all for his insider tidbits but wheres the concrete done deal reports. i was unaware much of anything happens over the weekends anyways?
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179891 Chick signs in HAM for 160. Meanwhile it's still not Jones' fault for failing to get a deal done with Chick and Dressler.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179894 33 minutes ago, Zontar said: Chick signs in HAM for 160. Meanwhile it's still not Jones' fault for failing to get a deal done with Chick and Dressler. Who has said it was Jones' fault? Even at RiderFans they weren't blaming Jones from what I read when they were first released.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179895 1 hour ago, Jacquie said: Who has said it was Jones' fault? Even at RiderFans they weren't blaming Jones from what I read when they were first released. Dressier said Jones made a weak attempt to renegotiate with him days after Jones said they tried. I'm assuming it was the same for Chick.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179920 3 hours ago, Jacquie said: Who has said it was Jones' fault? Even at RiderFans they weren't blaming Jones from what I read when they were first released. That's what I meant. Rider fans are defending Jones at all cost even in light of Chick's new contract. Quite evident Jones had no use for him. But rather than simply admit he wanted to go younger and cheaper at the position he made the official company line "we had no choice" and let Taman's battered corpse and Chick's greedy agent take all the fall out. And Rider fans are accomodating him right on cue.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179933 I didn't really watch him play much at all last season, but the impressions that I got was that the play of Chick dropped off considerably compared to years before. At 160 it's a safe price but he may be on the decline.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179944 Chick's signing may make it less likely they retain Laurent, so this is good news.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179946 I just can't see Hamilton letting Laurent get away while signing 33 yr old John Chick whose best days are behind him.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179948 2 minutes ago, iso_55 said: I just can't see Hamilton letting Laurent get away while signing 33 yr old John Chick whose best days are behind him. I think they signed Chick just with that in mind...IF Laurent hasn't been re-signed by Feb. 9th, you can bet there is going to be some tremendous offers coming in for Laurent....more than what the Cats can stomach...I hope we are one of the bigger forces in driving that price up if not the biggest.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179952 I just don't know if Chick can put together an entire solid season. Guess we'll find out.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179954 4 minutes ago, iso_55 said: I just don't know if Chick can put together an entire solid season. Guess we'll find out. In a much better system with much better players with him, I am not ruling it out.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179958 You have to think that Hamilton's level of success was a factor in Chick going there. Figures it was his best opportunity to go to the Cuo.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179970 On 22/01/2016 at 9:12 AM, DR. CFL said: Jones is discarding what he believes are overpriced players and has confidence in his abilities and Murphy's abilities to actually go out and find players. Popp, Barker, Murhpy, Tillman and Paul Jones have all demonstrated the ability to find players the key to any team's success. Perhaps you need to be reminded that Tillman traded the best deep passer in the league for the worst then for good measure traded a first round pick for Brody McKnight among other brilliant moves. You're reading way too much Riderfan propaganda if you believe Tillman has any usable skills.
January 25, 20169 yr comment_179977 8 hours ago, Zontar said: Chick signs in HAM for 160. Meanwhile it's still not Jones' fault for failing to get a deal done with Chick and Dressler. Isn't that less than the Regina team is paying Shawn Lemon?
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment