Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_710809
1 hour ago, Atomic said:

Another tidbit from that article. 

"For the record, Grant’s contract with the Argos will pay him $84,000 in hard money this season with playtime bonuses maxing out at $92,500, per source. It’s hardly a rich deal."

Fiscal mismanagemnnt!!!

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Views 318.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Super Duper Negatron
    Super Duper Negatron

    In case anyone needed more proof of what a class act Brady O. is, he came out to my son's U13 A3 hockey final today (he is neighbors with one of the boys on the team) to watch the game, give the kids

  • I for one would like to see "Hawk" Tui Eli get in the starting lineup.

  • Author
comment_710811
18 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said:

Another tidbit from that article. 

"For the record, Grant’s contract with the Argos will pay him $84,000 in hard money this season with playtime bonuses maxing out at $92,500, per source. It’s hardly a rich deal."

Fiscal mismanagemnnt!!!

It was never about money. It was about injury concerns and wanting to bring in fresh bodies to try and get younger. Both Tait and Hamilton have said as much in recent articles and on the radio. 

comment_710813
2 minutes ago, Noeller said:

It was never about money. It was about injury concerns and wanting to bring in fresh bodies to try and get younger. Both Tait and Hamilton have said as much in recent articles and on the radio. 

That's your ongoing narrative, please find me a quote from Walters saying the same, I believe in the few interviews he gave he indicated he would like to see both Grant and Jeffcoat return.

comment_710845
8 hours ago, Fatty Liver said:

That's your ongoing narrative, please find me a quote from Walters saying the same, I believe in the few interviews he gave he indicated he would like to see both Grant and Jeffcoat return.

Walters said they were not sure if they coukd fit him in the sms...it wasn't an injury issue

 

7 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Half a kramdi deal, 10k less than Augustine, what 15k more than the vet min? For a guy who would lead our none qbs in tds. Pretty good value imo. 

Yup..we allocated too much money in poor spots...

comment_710929
23 hours ago, Fatty Liver said:

That's your ongoing narrative, please find me a quote from Walters saying the same, I believe in the few interviews he gave he indicated he would like to see both Grant and Jeffcoat return.

I wouldn't base much on Walter's public comments. He's not going to say "we believe X player is an injury concern so we didn't offer a contract".  That would negatively affect their ability to find work elsewhere in football. 

comment_710938

Grant is always a great player when healthy. He hadn't given us a full season in 2 years. We all talked about the impact of his injuries all offseason. I will wait to see if he gives the Argos a full season before deciding whether or not he was a missed opportunity. Others may want to dissect it now but Grey Cups aren't won or lost in July.

comment_710940

A few random thoughts on Grant:

He's a game changer and was a catalyst on special teams that, when the offense wasn't clicking and the D was holding down the fort, that changed the dynamic of games.  He could (can) score.  We won games because of him. 

I think it was foolish to let him walk.

Maybe he wanted more of a role on offense and that was something we weren't willing (or able) to provide him. 

I view him in the same vein as Jeffcoat .. when he's on the field he's an absolute beast, a difference maker, a guy who can flip the script and make others better (the special teams unit) .. but you couldn't count on him for a season and those stretches where he was at 100% were getting smaller and smaller.

comment_710943
14 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

Grant is always a great player when healthy. He hadn't given us a full season in 2 years. We all talked about the impact of his injuries all offseason. I will wait to see if he gives the Argos a full season before deciding whether or not he was a missed opportunity. Others may want to dissect it now but Grey Cups aren't won or lost in July.

100% the primary limiting factor with grant is health. 
 I get that we needed a young guy who’d stay healthy. Imo, with grants salary we could’ve easily continued to bring him back for half a season and used the other half to develop a replacement. 
 Like the deal we handed to kramdi, Zachs guaranteed money, and Brady’s deal, it isn’t the biggest issue with our roster decisions, but it is an issue. 
 
We could make a whole list of all those mistakes and rank them, grant probably wouldn’t be top5, but we certainly lost value and made our self worse for a tiny bit of money. The grant move hurts, jj hurts less due to his salary but our dl sure would’ve been better with him here. 

comment_710945
13 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

100% the primary limiting factor with grant is health. 
 I get that we needed a young guy who’d stay healthy. Imo, with grants salary we could’ve easily continued to bring him back for half a season and used the other half to develop a replacement. 
 Like the deal we handed to kramdi, Zachs guaranteed money, and Brady’s deal, it isn’t the biggest issue with our roster decisions, but it is an issue. 
 
We could make a whole list of all those mistakes and rank them, grant probably wouldn’t be top5, but we certainly lost value and made our self worse for a tiny bit of money. The grant move hurts, jj hurts less due to his salary but our dl sure would’ve been better with him here. 

We needed to get younger. Still do. The plan is to be a contender for our home cup. The growing pains suck but another year of Grant or JJ and a few others would have made that goal be further away than now. Our 2-4 record sucks but in a transition year it was going to be tougher to win. Injuries made it even tougher. At the end of the day we could have run it back again and contended this year or started the build for next year and learn to live with a butt load of rookie mistakes until cohesiveness is built. I will take the latter. I will even argue we didn't go far enough.

20 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

100% the primary limiting factor with grant is health. 
 I get that we needed a young guy who’d stay healthy. Imo, with grants salary we could’ve easily continued to bring him back for half a season and used the other half to develop a replacement. 
 Like the deal we handed to kramdi, Zachs guaranteed money, and Brady’s deal, it isn’t the biggest issue with our roster decisions, but it is an issue. 
 
We could make a whole list of all those mistakes and rank them, grant probably wouldn’t be top5, but we certainly lost value and made our self worse for a tiny bit of money. The grant move hurts, jj hurts less due to his salary but our dl sure would’ve been better with him here. 

Your KR/PR needs to be reliably healthy in this league. Smith isn't chopped liver either, and is a rookie getting better week to week. 

comment_710948
2 hours ago, Colin Unger said:

I wouldn't base much on Walter's public comments. He's not going to say "we believe X player is an injury concern so we didn't offer a contract".  That would negatively affect their ability to find work elsewhere in football. 

Walters took the high road and didn't sewer Grant's reliability on his way out the door. Nothing more. Salary and ability had nothing to do with us not resigning Grant. That shouldn't even be a discussion. It's as obvious as the sky is blue.

comment_710959
55 minutes ago, Noeller said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder if DT referencing Eli practicing on day one as a ‘good development’ is any indication he’d like to see him takeover the starting C job… and practicing all week is a potential step in that direction.  I’d be shocked if it happened, but also thrilled.  I’m probably grasping at straws.

comment_710962
21 minutes ago, BomberBall. said:

I wonder if DT referencing Eli practicing on day one as a ‘good development’ is any indication he’d like to see him takeover the starting C job… and practicing all week is a potential step in that direction.  I’d be shocked if it happened, but also thrilled.  I’m probably grasping at straws.

Think we'd all be doing the happy dance if he started......

comment_710966
1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

We needed to get younger. Still do. The plan is to be a contender for our home cup. The growing pains suck but another year of Grant or JJ and a few others would have made that goal be further away than now. Our 2-4 record sucks but in a transition year it was going to be tougher to win. Injuries made it even tougher. At the end of the day we could have run it back again and contended this year or started the build for next year and learn to live with a butt load of rookie mistakes until cohesiveness is built. I will take the latter. I will even argue we didn't go far enough.

Your KR/PR needs to be reliably healthy in this league. Smith isn't chopped liver either, and is a rookie getting better week to week. 

We do, but we haven’t done much of that soo far. 2025 should be the plan, but I don’t think the mafia work that way. 
 30 for grant is probably our overall average starters age. 
 
we are at a point where it isn’t even about age, it’s about quality. Our worst players are really old. We can get younger and better at the same time by either going to a better player who wouldn’t be nearly as old or going to a young guy. 
 

Thomas, biggie, ba, kola, neuf all need to go. Even if they went for an average age of 29 we’d get a lot better and younger. 
 

keep in mind strevy is 30, lofton is 31, bonds is 28, then we just brought back lucky who is 32. Mainly we’ve gotten younger through rash of injuries. We’ve actually gotten older and some spots like db and qb. 

8 minutes ago, Atomic said:

I could see Garbutt, Hallett, and Murphy all in this week - take out Ogbevoen, Mitchell, and Chris-Ike

Actually now that I think about it, they could even bring on Lucky Whitehead instead of Murphy and still be fine on the ratio

Don’t expect mci to come out. I doubt ogbevoen will be though he should. 

Create an account or sign in to comment