This line from Lawler yesterday:

Quote

“I was telling Zach once we’re done with this run, whenever it is, there’s going to be a 30 for 30 on the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.”

What a great presser with him yesterday. Is it just me or has he grown a ton in the last year or so? He seems so centered, so determined, and prepared to be a leader on this team.

This 2023 offense is going to be ******* wild.

7 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

Bailey is just 29 & has a team friendly contract. He's a mucker & a great blocker. He does his job & is effective doing it but doesn't get the credit he deserves. He's also the heart & soul of our receiving corps. He also never misses any games. Something that Greg Ellingson & other receivers couldn't say. He won't be making $200,000 as a receiver  with a new contract. I'll miss the guy if he signs elsewhere. I'd be happy if he came back. 

Got a feeling he's been in Walters office talking numbers to try and stay. He'd be great depth, keep him for certain packages, knows the offense.

Bailey is severely underappreciated around the league and that hurts his bargaining power.  For example, he's not even mentioned in this morning's article on cfl.ca

https://www.cfl.ca/2023/02/15/still-out-there-top-free-agents-still-available/

I’d love to have him back but where does he play? Wolitarski is another under appreciated guy and I’m not sure how much he is going to get the ball either. 

I just don't see how that would work. It's time for other players to get an opportunity. Bailey was a very solid piece to the last 3 year run. But he isn't irreplaceable. 

If Bailey is back I am happy. If we go with a younger receiver for that 5th spot, I am happy.

I have no problem with Agudosi or another rookie taking the Sheed spot (though I really love Sheed) as long as they can stay healthy. As SF27 mentioned, Sheed never misses games and is the heart and soul of the receiving corps. 

I like Sheed a lot, but at this point I'd rather we spend that money on the interior DL.

Fly, Bailey, fly!

27 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

If Bailey is back I am happy. If we go with a younger receiver for that 5th spot, I am happy.

Just to be clear, You are happy?

Bailey fits his role well but there isn't a lot of cash left for the 3rd american receiver (who would be the 4th receiving option). Probably better off having one of the younger cheaper guys in that spot.

3 minutes ago, blue85gold said:

Bailey fits his role well but there isn't a lot of cash left for the 3rd american receiver (who would be the 4th receiving option). Probably better off having one of the younger cheaper guys in that spot.

yes but can they fly?????

Walters was quoted in the Freep today as saying that he's pretty much done spending, and that he tried to re-sign Sayles but was out-bid. Depending on how things go at training camp, I can see a receiver being traded.

If we’re going to make any more moves I would love to bring in Mike Moore. Solid DT, had six sacks last season with the Als. 

1 hour ago, Wideleft said:

Bailey is severely underappreciated around the league and that hurts his bargaining power.  For example, he's not even mentioned in this morning's article on cfl.ca

https://www.cfl.ca/2023/02/15/still-out-there-top-free-agents-still-available/

What I greatly appreciate with Bailey’s play is he doesn’t F around on the field. He’s all business and straddles that line (mostly successful) that separates being a fierce competitor to being a **** head (see Rider players for examples).

He plays like he’s constantly trying to prove himself.

26 minutes ago, Tracker said:

Walters was quoted in the Freep today as saying that he's pretty much done spending, and that he tried to re-sign Sayles but was out-bid. Depending on how things go at training camp, I can see a receiver being traded.

Which is exactly what a canny shopper says to the shopkeeper.

did this get posted yet? Everyone so busy fighting, not sure if it got lost in the shuffle: 
 

 

I thought we would miss Adams more than we did last year and I believe it's because Bailey took on his role. 

6 minutes ago, Noeller said:

did this get posted yet? Everyone so busy fighting, not sure if it got lost in the shuffle: 
 

 

Sounds like a solid STer

4 minutes ago, JCon said:

I thought we would miss Adams more than we did last year and I believe it's because Bailey took on his role. 

that's another guy who hasn't signed anywhere yet, I think....?? Wonder if it's the end of the road for him...

5 minutes ago, Noeller said:

that's another guy who hasn't signed anywhere yet, I think....?? Wonder if it's the end of the road for him...

Doesn't look like he's ready to stop playing.

 

 

I think Darvin would be a better fit at the boundary WR spot than Bailey. That said...I feel money is better spent elsewhere. We have Schoen and Lawler. Those 2 alone could carry our passing game.

23 minutes ago, BBlink said:

I think Darvin would be a better fit at the boundary WR spot than Bailey. That said...I feel money is better spent elsewhere. We have Schoen and Lawler. Those 2 alone could carry our passing game.

I would much rather have Bailey then Darvin (at this point in their careers).

But I think everyone still needs to wrap their heads around the fact that positions need to be filled in training camp by guys on rookie contracts. We have retained our core, made a splash signing. Now it's the scouts' turn.

15 hours ago, Fatty Liver said:

Sorry, read it somewhere but can't find anything confirming it either, it was a crazy day.

There was a Twitter link to an article saying Calgary was interested, but he has not signed with them or any team yet. 

I’d love to have Bailey, I just don’t know where you play him if you’re putting Demski, Schoen and Lawler in the slot (which they should be)