Just now, kelownabomberfan said:

Yeah she wasn't the Queen until 1952.

Ok. Probably 1928 then. 

4 hours ago, BomberfanMKS said:

Yeh BOLO isn't as sure a catcher

The sample size is way too small for that sort of pronouncement. 

By all accounts he has great hands...and from the small sample size seems to...he catches generally with his hands too...which is a plus

That's a great pic

 

 

 

8 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said:

 

That's my edit!!

4 hours ago, Geebrr said:

 

 

And unlike cirder fans who wear them for no damn reason. Stegall actually played for the Bengals so there's some sense to wearing it.

5 hours ago, Geebrr said:

 

 

What a terrible game to go to....

Just now, Jesse said:

What a terrible game to go to....

Not sure if this is sarcasm or not but that game was wild

Just now, voodoochylde said:

Not sure if this is sarcasm or not but that game was wild

IIRC, @Jesse is a Bengals fan.

10 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said:

IIRC, @Jesse is a Bengals fan.

Wow. Good memory.

Yes - it was a bad game if you were cheering for the Bengals and they just contiually gave the game away.

 

5 minutes ago, JCon said:

 

so in this scenario, that would mean only BC can catch the Bombers... so realistically it should say a Bomber win and Calgary loss clinches first place

Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first?

3 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first?

Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them. 

Just now, TrueBlue4ever said:

Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them. 

Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this)

7 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this)

Confirmed if anything goes bad we blame 17to85 for jinxing us!

Just now, Brandon said:

Confirmed if anything goes bad we blame 17to85

Why not? My wife already does it.

13 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this)

I'm not superstitious but OMFG WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT

If this comes to pass, BANNED!

1 hour ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them. 

About the same odds as me getting pregnant. Statistically speaking, the odds are so close to zero as to be indistinguishable from zero.

David....seriously........

4 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first?