February 21, 20205 yr comment_463716 1 hour ago, J5V said: The dog did his job correctly. The question is, did the agents? All it takes is a technicality. The dog definitely did it's job, which gave the agent the information required for the search. So I think that in the spectrum of procedural defences, that one is going to be tough.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463717 21 hours ago, bigg jay said: They'll have a hard time saying they didn't notice any of this in the car... The offensive lineman might of thought the duffel bag was lunch. You know so it coulda maybe been an accident.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463720 Ottawa has been sneakily quiet and their receivers are gross. Wonder if they sneak in with a big offer for Walker?? Edited February 21, 20205 yr by Bubba Zanetti
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463723 4 minutes ago, JCon said: Cheap. Wow, cheap. I bet they're going to get him some money under the table. Farhan always under reports Lion salaries. Grain of salt.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463730 I want to voice my displeasure in missing out on Rhymes, so I want to convey my disappointment with a short poem. What rhymes with Rhymes?
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463746 48 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Farhan always under reports Lion salaries. Grain of salt. Whenever Farhan says a team is not out of the mix....they are out of the mix.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463748 2 hours ago, Geebrr said: Again, the dog whose sole job is to identify the presence of drugs doing alerting an agent seems like more than enough probable cause to search the vehicle without consent. I don't get the procedural error. Why have the dog at all? The dog sniffing for drugs is IN OF ITSELF considered a search so the police can't use the dog alerting as probable cause for making a search. I.E. police can't walk up and down streets with a drug sniffing dog and when the dog alerts at a house, use that alert as probable cause for obtaining a warrant to search the house for drugs. It's a little less clear with dogs alerting during routine traffic stops - IF a driver has committed some other driving offense AND the dog alerts while the officer is dealing with that offense then the search for drugs is OK. Checkpoints further complicate the question, from what I understand at checkpoints police need to have pre-determined that they will pull over every nth car (every 2nd car, 5th car, 10th car, etc) to check for whatever the checkpoint is there to check for. They can't actually change their rules for the checkpoint mid-stream. So the border agent whose dog alerted him OUTSIDE of the checkpoint might not actually have the right to tell the checkpoint to do a further search because his dog alerting outside of the checkpoint is actually an illegal search by the dog. Edited February 21, 20205 yr by BomberfanMKS
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463751 4 minutes ago, BomberfanMKS said: So the border agent whose dog alerted him OUTSIDE of the checkpoint might not actually have the right to tell the checkpoint to do a further search because his dog alerting outside of the checkpoint is actually an illegal search by the dog. That's the sort of technicality a good lawyer is going to exploit in favour of his client and I'm sure Mr. Robinson will be able to afford a good lawyer.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463752 2 hours ago, Geebrr said: If the drug detecting dog alerts them, why would they need consent to search the vehicle? Because a drug dog, in and of itself, does not equal probable cause.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463753 14 minutes ago, JCon said: Maybe now they're out of the Walker "sweepstakes"? They have to be.....
February 21, 20205 yr Author comment_463755 Just now, Bubba Zanetti said: They have to be..... Farhan's reporting that they're paying Holley in Save-On gift cards and Subway coupons, so they may still be able to fit Walker in. We'll see how this develops.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463758 4 minutes ago, JCon said: Farhan's reporting that they're paying Holley in Save-On gift cards and Subway coupons, so they may still be able to fit Walker in. We'll see how this develops. His contract includes transportation compensation in the form of a Vancouver Transit bus pass.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463763 12 minutes ago, JCon said: Farhan's reporting that they're paying Holley in Save-On gift cards and Subway coupons, so they may still be able to fit Walker in. We'll see how this develops. Farhan has been reporting BC may be able to fit in walker before the cfl was created.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463764 2 hours ago, J5V said: The dog did his job correctly. The question is, did the agents? All it takes is a technicality. Actually, there have been several cases in the US where it was proven in court that the dog handler had trained the dog to respond to a covert signal from the handler and react as if the dog had actually detected drugs. With that amount of ganja, it wouldn't take much for even a comatose dog to detect it.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463768 Just now, Tracker said: Actually, there have been several cases in the US where it was proven in court that the dog handler had trained the dog to respond to a covert signal from the handler and react as if the dog had actually detected drugs. With that amount of ganja, it wouldn't take much for even a comatose dog to detect it. My buddy's dog ate a large quantity of his black hash once. Talk about a comatose dog.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463777 *If* that salary is correct on Rhymes then I'm surprised that no other team would of offered more for a big play receiver who is tall and has some speed.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463781 4 minutes ago, Noeller said: Feel sorry for the mods that have to clean this thread up... No thread is ever safe once the MBB legal team enters the discussion. Edited February 21, 20205 yr by Pete Catan's Ghost
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463784 2 minutes ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: No thread is ever safe once the MBB legal team enters the discussion.
February 21, 20205 yr comment_463820 3 hours ago, BomberfanMKS said: The dog sniffing for drugs is IN OF ITSELF considered a search so the police can't use the dog alerting as probable cause for making a search. I.E. police can't walk up and down streets with a drug sniffing dog and when the dog alerts at a house, use that alert as probable cause for obtaining a warrant to search the house for drugs. It's a little less clear with dogs alerting during routine traffic stops - IF a driver has committed some other driving offense AND the dog alerts while the officer is dealing with that offense then the search for drugs is OK. Checkpoints further complicate the question, from what I understand at checkpoints police need to have pre-determined that they will pull over every nth car (every 2nd car, 5th car, 10th car, etc) to check for whatever the checkpoint is there to check for. They can't actually change their rules for the checkpoint mid-stream. So the border agent whose dog alerted him OUTSIDE of the checkpoint might not actually have the right to tell the checkpoint to do a further search because his dog alerting outside of the checkpoint is actually an illegal search by the dog. We are making some pretty big assumptions here. Until some actual informatiomation comes out staring otherwise, safe to assume the dog was being used in an authorized/legal way. I havent seen any actual report stating the dog was used outside of what it is legally intended for as of yet. Cops are pretty aware of what the procedure is to follow, particularly special units. Edited February 21, 20205 yr by Geebrr
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment