Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_346434
1 minute ago, Booch said:

I think the old spot..downtown..St B....would have been poor places...where it is I think is the best spot, and it's the only area of the city where the city can expand with proper infrastructure to sustain/service it...Working in the Civil Engineering/Land Development industry that is exactly where I and many I know would have built it based on forecasting..economic growth and population density, especially with majority of the population that will be new..younger families as well as to connect with the university aged crowd etc..etc...

Revisit the issue in 5 to 8 years and see the only complaints will just be coming from the same people who feel they have been slighted from having their convenience now become a bit less convenient

Agreed, The city is definitely growing south, the stadium might look pretty central in a few years.

  • Replies 181
  • Views 16.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Once upon a time there was a wonderful place called Canad Inns Stadium.  We must be careful not to speak about this time too loudly, but the memories of such a place warm us in this cold and horrible

  • MOBomberFan
    MOBomberFan

    Anyone who thinks they get to decide who a real fan is and isn't... based solely on how many home games they attend... all other factors be damned... ought to give their swollen head a shake. One day

  • The funny thing is IGF is 100x more comfortable to attend events at than MTS Place. The place does not get its credit in the city.

comment_346437
2 minutes ago, Tracker said:

There are a core of fans who will support their teams and come out rain or shine, but there are a lot who do not fit into that category and want to be entertained, even in a loss by their team being competitive. I had seasons tickets during the Reinbold era but stopped going to the games due to the team's ineptness. Losing is one thing, and its going to happen to the best teams (except maybe Calgary) but when going to home games becomes something you dread, that is bad news.

I've had seasons tickets for the last 15 years (i'm 25) have been paying for my own since I turned 18, I understand it's a bit of a commitment to get to every game and I don't expect that from the casuals. I just don't understand how people find all this time and money magically in the winter to go watch a hockey team that plays 41 home games a year plus playoffs, then pays $20 for parking. 

Bombers season tickets are CHEAP compared to even buying half a season for the Jets and they provide WAY more options to commute. The weather is beautiful, the product has been good lately, and the atmosphere is way more fun than sitting in that cold arena.

my 2 cents.

comment_346438
2 minutes ago, Gotmilt said:

I've had seasons tickets for the last 15 years (i'm 25) have been paying for my own since I turned 18, I understand it's a bit of a commitment to get to every game and I don't expect that from the casuals. I just don't understand how people find all this time and money magically in the winter to go watch a hockey team that plays 41 home games a year plus playoffs, then pays $20 for parking. 

Bombers season tickets are CHEAP compared to even buying half a season for the Jets and they provide WAY more options to commute. The weather is beautiful, the product has been good lately, and the atmosphere is way more fun than sitting in that cold arena.

my 2 cents.

While value works in the Blue Bombers favour, the weather works against them as much as it works for them, people have and/or find more things to do in the summer months, and there is far less competition for the Jets in the winter months.  Also keep in mind that the drop-off from the NHL to the CFL is steep.

comment_346440
Just now, Spock said:

While value works in the Blue Bombers favour, the weather works against them as much as it works for them, people have and/or find more things to do in the summer months, and there is far less competition for the Jets in the winter months.  Also keep in mind that the drop-off from the NHL to the CFL is steep.

I guess it's a difference of who you want to support because personally I don't think the entertainment value is higher in the NHL and I played high level hockey all my life.

comment_346442
3 minutes ago, Spock said:

The opinions of the many outweigh the opinions of the few.

1523126845-image-2015-03-02-death-of-spo

College football in terms of quality of talent is lower than CFL (I don't think that's even debatable) as well but for some reason they pull in massively higher attendance numbers than our league, I'm not even talking about the SEC. It's not about quality it's about the culture. For some reason people have been brain washed into thinking CFL is an inadequate product but Americans can continue to attend tier 3 college football games with teams that get blown out year after year. It's about pride not product.

comment_346444

Old Stadium - if you parked for free at Polo Park or for $3 - $5 at one of the many lots nearby and realize it will take you 20-30 min. to get out of the parking lot, you can go to one of the many restaurants/lounges nearby and half a bite to eat/drink.  When you get back to your vehicle 30 min later traffic has cleared out and getting home is easy peasy.

New stadium - if you are one of the 5,000 folks parked at the university for the tidy sum of $20 and do not want to spend a half an hour getting out of the parkades and are hungry you have to walk 20 minutes to the nearest restaurant, then 20 minutes back to your vehicle after you have eaten.

 

This is an example of one of the little inconveniences that have turned people off from attending games at the new stadium.  Prices are playing a factor as well.  $99 for tickets between the 20 yard line and goal line that remain largely unsold for most games...same with the $70 seats in the corner end zones.  Concession prices - ie. bottle of pepsi that was $3.50 during the last year at the old stadium increased to $5 in the first year at the new stadium and is now $6 or $6.50.  To his credit, Wade hasn't completely turned a blind eye to this by offering family packs and student packs for single games and  season tickets and some food packages but there is more work that needs to be done.

comment_346446
5 minutes ago, Gotmilt said:

College football in terms of quality of talent is lower than CFL (I don't think that's even debatable) as well but for some reason they pull in massively higher attendance numbers than our league, I'm not even talking about the SEC. It's not about quality it's about the culture. For some reason people have been brain washed into thinking CFL is an inadequate product but Americans can continue to attend tier 3 college football games with teams that get blown out year after year. It's about pride not product.

Prestige accounts for a variety variables, and to keep the topic relevant, speaking for Winnipeg and its people's entertainment time/dollars, the NHL is a much larger draw than the CFL.

comment_346476
15 hours ago, Spock said:

Given that the location was more central, perhaps those outlets were built with the vision of having high traffic year round. Time will tell if the current location will lead to similar economic growth in the area.

The Stadium in either location didnt lead to growth.  its used like 10 times a year.  That being said, its South Winnipeg.  

comment_346482
15 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

How about wrestling?  Put a ring on a rolling stage and bring it out at half time.  I know a guy... 😉

I dunno, I haven't looked at TV ratings lately, but American Ninja Warrior is huge with the kids right now. Little kids these days seem to like to jump and climb all over stuff the way my friends and I did wrestling moves back in the 90s.

comment_346485
5 minutes ago, nate007 said:

I dunno, I haven't looked at TV ratings lately, but American Ninja Warrior is huge with the kids right now. Little kids these days seem to like to jump and climb all over stuff the way my friends and I did wrestling moves back in the 90s.

To be honest, we rarely watch the half time show.  And I cant imagine it impacting attendance either way.  But I did watch the last game I attended, it was a game of Ultimate.  Pretty interesting and I imagine totally free for the Bombers.  Sort of like Timbits hockey.  That kind of thing, its something different to watch for the people sitting there and costs nothing.

comment_346486
14 hours ago, blueandgoldguy said:

Prices are playing a factor as well.  $99 for tickets between the 20 yard line and goal line that remain largely unsold for most games...same with the $70 seats in the corner end zones.  Concession prices - ie. bottle of pepsi that was $3.50 during the last year at the old stadium increased to $5 in the first year at the new stadium and is now $6 or $6.50.  To his credit, Wade hasn't completely turned a blind eye to this by offering family packs and student packs for single games and  season tickets and some food packages but there is more work that needs to be done.

If you don't sell out the cheap seats first, not many people will "walk up" and buy $70-$100 seats from a mostly unsold section.

comment_346491
54 minutes ago, Spock said:

If you don't sell out the cheap seats first, not many people will "walk up" and buy $70-$100 seats from a mostly unsold section.

One aspect to IGF is that with the open concourse, people can buy the cheapest seats and just wander around.  I doubt its a huge issue but in my own circle of friends, I know people (and have done it myself) where you buy the cheapest ticket and meet up with friends.  Because there is always a couple people wanting to get drinks or whatever, you can sort of rotate out of seats/concourse area.  Now that I have a friend with a Loge, same thing.  Cheapest seat and hang out in the loge.

But all the arguments aside its not like attendance is terrible.  And probably every reason listed is a partial factor.  Bombers are profitable, right? 

comment_346498

6 of the 10 biggest crowds in Bombers history have been at IGF. Our average IGF attendance is higher than our average Canad Inns Stadium average. Given all the things competing for entertainment dollars, combined with 4K TV and every game being broadcast, I don't see why there's a cause for concern at all.

SSK 23 @ WPG 41 (Sep 12, 1993)    Regular Season    35,959
SSK 7 @ WPG 22 (Sep 12, 2015)    Regular Season    35,156
TOR 12 @ WPG 31 (Oct 30, 1998)    Regular Season    33,810
SSK 13 @ WPG 25 (Sep 08, 2013)    Regular Season    33,500
MTL 38 @ WPG 33 (Jun 27, 2013)    Regular Season    33,500

OTT 32 @ WPG 45 (Jul 03, 1991)    Pre-season    33,421
OTT 21 @ WPG 19 (Jul 02, 1992)    Pre-season    33,359
SSK 23 @ WPG 17 (Aug 07, 2014)    Regular Season    33,234
SSK 10 @ WPG 17 (Sep 10, 2016)    Regular Season    33,234
SSK 30 @ WPG 24 (Sep 07, 2014)    Regular Season    33,234

Source: https://stats.cfldb.ca/team/winnipeg-blue-bombers/attendance/

Create an account or sign in to comment