Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 277
  • Views 22.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • do or die
    do or die

    No more bunk about how we just couldn't incorporate Bowman into our O, please.  New guy at R, almost matched Bowman's season production....in his first half, in the CFL.

  • Wanna-B-Fanboy
    Wanna-B-Fanboy

    I'm said Idiot.   I have it in my signature to remind me that you are not a voluntarily obtuse assclown-troll who posts in a manner akin to a snide-ass backhand complimenting, fact denying,

  • blitzmore
    blitzmore

    They have some decent looking receivers on the practice roster. This talk that they NEVER bring in good receivers is ridiculous.

comment_344079

All for the best that Bowman was sent packing....I thought when we signed him he would fit in nicely with Adams and give the opposition fits....The only fits that happened were the conniption fits the fans were having watching his pathetic effort...Montreal gets a vet. receiver for Johnny to throw to and we get to free up some cash...That's about it except now we have a spot to put in an actual receiver...or could we be thinking Flanders...hmmmmmmmmmmm

comment_344084
1 hour ago, Gotmilt said:

I didn't say they were going to bring in another reciever.

Okay....but how do you suppose this will be interpreted in the context of a discussion about Bowman?

"Hanging on to an aging wr who clearly can't catch making $140k a season is a waste and we'll likely make a signing during NFL camp cuts."

Edited by Throw Long Bannatyne

comment_344091
24 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

Okay....but how do you suppose this will be interpreted in the context of a discussion about Bowman?

"Hanging on to an aging wr who clearly can't catch making $140k a season is a waste and we'll likely make a signing during NFL camp cuts."

I meant they'll likely relocate those funds in another position, if you interpreted that as they'd sign another reciever that's fine and they may do that if they're not happy with what they have on the bench right now.

Personally I haven't watched enough practice to know that for sure but to rely on the two Canadians they drafted this year (those are the only other recievers we've seen at this point) to come in and fill an import reciever pos I think would be foolish as some have suggested.

I'd like to see them start Thompkins or Washington this week, I'd rather see Thompkins but they know better than I do.

Create an account or sign in to comment