Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_275000
2 hours ago, SPuDS said:

I totally did lol. wow, good job Walters at restocking the canuck pass catching spot.  we should have one heck of battle in the next few seasons for reps IF these guys are as advertised..

 

Blaszko, wolitarsky and catchison. We didnt get any NIs worth keeping in the draft but still managed to fall @$$ backwards into NI talent at the position. They say its better to be good then lucky. Well right now walters seems to be both. 

  • Replies 173
  • Views 26.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Chris Jones is definitely a major DB.

  • Aaaaaaah Biguns, how I've missed you

  • Hmm, how should I put this? Well, In a very loose sense, Chris Jones is to GMs, what Donald Trump is to Presidents...?

  • Author
comment_275652

That's a whole lot of energy going into debating the "proper" # selection. I'd be a whole lot more concerned at how my team looked against the Stampeders. Didn't see a whole lot of positives, outside of #23.  Drew used to wear #82, but apparently someone , inactive(don't quote me on that), has already laid claim to the digits. Here's to #80 lighting up those CFL defensive backfields...Especially the hated Rider one, and of course , Tranna's.

comment_275663
23 minutes ago, Biguns said:

That's a whole lot of energy going into debating the "proper" # selection. I'd be a whole lot more concerned at how my team looked against the Stampeders. Didn't see a whole lot of positives, outside of #23.  Drew used to wear #82, but apparently someone , inactive(don't quote me on that), has already laid claim to the digits. Here's to #80 lighting up those CFL defensive backfields...Especially the hated Rider one, and of course , Tranna's.

DAnuXX6WAAAeODj.jpg

comment_275696
58 minutes ago, Mark F said:

The cosmonaut?

I thought he wore   #8.

I think I've told my first Jets jersey story on here enough over the years, but suffice to say, I've got an in depth memory of Jets 2.0 #8 history. 

Burmi wore it year 1 and 2. Trouba took it year 3, 2013/14. And he'll wear it until his contract expires in 2025.

(yes, I'm an optimist)

comment_275700

Down the road, if they want to activate him, where does this kid fit on the 44?

He would be one of 21 game-activated Nats.

If you look at the Wpg vs Stamps Depth Chart I guess he goes in for Coates?

And then they could rotate him through various receiver positions depending on formation.

Might give the club options on O such as using Flanders ...

Edited by Doublezero

comment_275735
6 hours ago, Biguns said:

That's a whole lot of energy going into debating the "proper" # selection. I'd be a whole lot more concerned at how my team looked against the Stampeders. Didn't see a whole lot of positives, outside of #23.  Drew used to wear #82, but apparently someone , inactive(don't quote me on that), has already laid claim to the digits. Here's to #80 lighting up those CFL defensive backfields...Especially the hated Rider one, and of course , Tranna's.

Just tell him to tell the team he's rethought things, and has his heart set on wearing 85, so if they could put him in 85 it would be great.

Don't do that. Stegall is a god

Edited by brett_c_b

comment_275823
11 minutes ago, Stickem said:

I'm not expecting much from Wolitarsky....but when does he start rippin it up lol...We need a hit of enthusiasm after that last stinker at home, and I don't care what no. he wears

Exactly I was trying to change the subject from the loss, I've come to the conclusion I'm ok with the selection as long as he wears a tinted visor.

Create an account or sign in to comment