HardCoreBlue

I'm thinking the only thing that matters is hoisting that Grey Cup.

I'm hoping for the opposite effect that will cause this headline in about a month: 'Leafs a mystery, nothing working.' I have an unhealthy relationship with the Leafs, I know. But good news is, I can go back to liking Mike Babcock.

You used the word bemoaning. I used it a work months ago and was given the golf clap. I give it to you.

Nice lid. :-)

And he sure puts a hallow over his head when being interviewed off the field. Yeesh. Someone should show him the clips of his 'highlights' in real time as he explains to the CFL world he's not like that.

Yup if we can knock Banks off his game, that pouty attitude will cascade to the rest of the kitty cats.

He's a dynamic player when he's in the zone so get under his skin, throw him off his game and his negative energy will rub off on his teammates.

That's coming versus Hamilton. :-)

Example, early in the game when Hughes purposely launched low rolled into ZC. Got called but really cheap.

Imo it was moving forward because he got hit not because he was throwing. Hard to see in real time but that's what video showed me.

Yes absolutely. Thankless job. I have more issue with the two calls tonight the command centre, who had the luxury of taking their time, on the calls they made based on video.

Really? Let's review the tape again.It's a bit condescending to say if someone (like me) interpret it different we haven't watched much football. Seriously.

Ticats suck. 🙂

His arm moved because he was hit not because he was passing imo.

Northern as well.

Does the control centre not have the same technology as Gmoney to get stills like this? Geez.

Is it because his arm is on the line of scrimmage? I don't get the call.

Now certain scribes are calling for Babcock's firing. Ahhhhhh. Yea that's the problem. Keep it coming please.

Yup. Quick slants to Woli, Petermann and Demski would be a nice adjustment 2nd half.

Whether your back foot is down or in the air, it was clearly over the line of scrimmage as he threw it. I'm confused. Not enough evidence to overturn? What more is needed?

It looks like he tried but failed.

Petermann has demonstrated on the few occasions he has been given that he can get you those tough 7 8 yards you need for a first down. Demski probably played his best game as a Bomber last week, let's not stop that momentum but sprinkle in Petermann now and then to keep Sask's D off balance. Make those halfbacks, corners and the safety work hard.

Okay, then I say add a few plays leaving in Harris and interchange Demski and Petermann depending on the situation. I believe that's called a wrinkle.

Back to the actual game, can we not use Demski and Petermann interchangeably like we do with ZC and CS depending on the situation?

Wow that was well written. Are you sure you got in from there?