I guess it's a bit of both.
I get the idea behind a "draft & develop" team. Every team drafts, every team develops. Some, like Wpg, however need to rely on it far more due to being a relatively undesirable, small market team. Get the idea, bought the tshirt.
I give Chevy and his staff huge props for their drafts. No - you don't credit him for taking Laine after getting lucky with the ping pong balls. But Scheifele (7th), Trouba (9th), Ehlers (9th), Morrissey (13th) are all excellent value 1st rd picks. Lowry (3rd rd), Copp (4th), Hellebuyck (5th) are solid later round selections. Really, the draft successes have vastly outweighed the failures.
Yet, here we are. 6 years & 2 coaches into Chevy's tenure and we're not a good team. Not an improving, headed in the right direction unit. No, we're headed in the reverse direction. Possession numbers are down since the playoff year. Specialty teams, just as stagnant as ever. It took barely 2 years to turn Hellebuyck from one of the better prospects in the entire league to an almost forgotten guy amongst his own fanbase.
Other than strictly individual performances - what are the successes of this year? what do we do well? what (should) give us hope for the future?
I'm not in favour of a tear-down / rebuild either. Truthfully though a big part of that is likely that I really do like Wheeler & Little. I like what Buff brings, when he wants to. I appreciate Enstrom's game and have tried not to be too hard on him, because he's aging. Happened to every HOF, too. I'd miss seeing these guys, the people, leave Winnipeg.
The more I think about it, the only plan I think there ever was was to build a more talented organization through the draft. They've done that - now let's see if they can turn this team into a winner. And if that comes at the expense of a Wheeler or a Little or whomever - they have to look at it long & hard.
Probably the ONE point we can all agree on: they can't expect to start next year with virtually the same roster and expect to be better. Can they?