Mark H.

That's a big maybe. 93/94 with Dunigan healthy And for sure 2001

That is the mentality he has always had.

Sure he does. Just saying the play book could have been better suited to his injury

With a package consisting of 100% running plays - I'm honestly surprised he wants to come back.

His last season...sure. I'm referring more to a few years earlier. Calvillo did not have a great season in 2007 - you might recall our DL feasting on him Trestman arrived in Montreal in 2008: they implemented max protect, which worked very well with Calvillo's precise passing The results speak for themselves: back to back Grey Cups

Exactly. He's going to throw downfield more than most.

I would take that. Calvillo was solid with an appropriate game plan for his age/skill set

So then, the best answer is: no one was really doing it.

I clearly remember video footage of drafts from that era - Mack was clearly in charge I will agree that he didn't 'know jack' about the draft

Search the castle - there may be more!

BC and Edmonton are on the rise. I wouldn't expect Calgary to stand pat either. The Bombers will not finish first without making changes.

It was mostly a very good play by the DB.

You make it sound like Montreal didn't make adjustments. They had a week to do it, and they did.

Faj played a good game yesterday - that is not fake news. In other news - if ifs and buts are candy and nuts, we'll all have a Merry Christmas.

Not a perfect throw by any means, but the DB leaped for it and he didn't. The throw itself was easily in Lawler's catch radius. 9 times out of 10 - 8 & 89 make that a TD.

A GC loss has far fewer personal attacks. I will say this - it wouldn't hurt to realize that we are eating crow about Fajardo right now Perhaps that should inspire a little more moderation, when it comes to commenting.

It looked like a catchable ball to me - Lawler has come down with those before, that's for sure. Pretty similar catch to the one where he got his elbow down, against BC.

Removed a couple of posts. Please - let's dial back the hyperbole about players.

Pruned some posts. Feel free to take it to PM.

IMO - Montreal's primary game plan was stacking the box to stop Brady & generate pressure on passing downs. This worked - because ZC kept trying to throw downfield & was having trouble with the extra pressure. It's been the story of his season. On offense, max protect worked because the Bombers kept on trying to blitz. As the Als must have been hoping they would. But the game was there in spite of all that. If Lawler high points that throw in the end zone - we most likely win.

They were stuffing Brady on a good number of his runs. That's a really good front 7 over there. In those weather conditions, it did make sense pass the ball. IMO, ZC has struggled due to the additional hits he's been taking - he got at least one good smack last night.

Maybe it's a case of the players becoming frustrated by certain decisions. Just a thought...everything happens for a reason.

We used to have more of our starting defensive players on specials, in 2019 for sure.

Interesting question. It's what everyone has been saying about the Als. I'd guess right now, they are more than ok with people having that opinion of them.

Actually, I think it should humble us too. There was lots of trash talk about Fajardo, this past week and basically most of the season - and other players too. Any team and any player can win, on any given day. We forget that too often.