Jump to content

Mark H.

Moderators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mark H.

  1. With the exception of a couple of games where Randolph was starting at guard, they were starting 6 Canadians on Offense (3 OL, 2 Rec, 1 RB) Ford in the secondary, Kramdi at LB That's 8 Canadians without even using the nationalized American rule Thomas and Schmeckel could easily have been used as rotational pieces only, with an American being Lawson's primary replacement I'd never claim to be an expert, but that approach would sure make sense to me
  2. Give to Moose Jaw what is Moose Jaw's 😄
  3. Now, just imagine how good they could have been...
  4. They did not give themselves the best possible chance in the trenches. Randolph was good at guard and should have been starting. I'm not even going to get in to the DL I was hoping a loss wouldn't happen, but I was not surprised when it did. Football basics were not appropriately addressed, with better options available.
  5. Can it not just be said - that the truth is somewhere in the middle of those 2 points of view? Surely no actually believes that it's 100% one way or the other?
  6. That could work. But they'll need to seriously consider another American on the OL.
  7. Absolutely correct. Dinwiddie is very good at what he does, and I have no problem admitting it
  8. The Argos could very easily be in Winnipeg, next November.
  9. Do you think any sane person is going to go through this entire thread?
  10. Which was absolutely the correct assessment, they can't.
  11. I hate saying this, but I was not surprised. Problem #1 was the over match in the trenches. Neuf & Kola vs. Ceresna - was going to end badly.
  12. Bumping threads has always been against the rules
  13. You created that just too rant. It was not needed.
  14. Take a chill pill.
  15. Take a breath folks. Don't force us to lock the thread(s)
  16. The negated blocked punt and the fumbled punt. That's the game. Right there.
  17. Mark H. replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I'd take a hard look at 3 Americans on the OL.
  18. Wouldn't recommend any of that if you're driving through the Q'apelle and up to Lloyd
  19. May as well join the bovine party That may or may not be - a load of bull.
  20. Mark H. replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Excellent. I don't need to be liked. 🙃
  21. Mark H. replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    He caused at least one Fajardo fumble in the WF.
  22. Mark H. replied to BigBlue's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Sorry guys. Removed some posts to kill any further replies / sparring. Back to football, please
  23. Not so much from hard hits either. More stripping the ball while a receiver was running with it and not securing properly.
  24. Watching those highlights - that's terrible ball security in that game by the Als. One less fumble & the Als are probably in BC. The Bombers need to contain Grant and protect the football. The Argos will get pressure and they'll be looking to strip the ball.