Mike

I will say this about Kavis Reed ... if he can coach in an environment where he doesn't have to be THE loud guy, THE noticeable one that wears his emotions on his sleeve ... he might just impress. And I think that Winnipeg is going to be that type of environment. Kavis struggles with motivating. But he's a good coach.

lol @ the French logo being the opposite. ps is it called TD PLACE

Two of the names that have recently come into focus ... current Hamilton DC Orlondo Steinauer and current Hamilton DL coach Dennis McPhee. EDIT: for DC, I meant.

Noel is a major problem if you ask me. At what point do you start to wonder if the players are too entitled or if it's the coach who is simply a problem? Burmistrov left town because of Noel. Kane has feuded with him in the media. Ladd chirps him in practice. At what point do these stop being coincidences and do we look at the common denominator in all of these situations? His system doesn't seem to work, he's not consistent with just about ANYTHING regarding this team. We let other teams dictate how we are going to play instead of forcing them to play Jets hockey. He seems, at times, to choose his line combinations via names from a hat. He doesn't treat the players equally in terms of consequences for unstellar play. He doesn't do anything to allow young players to build confidence in themselves. And on top of all of that, he won't sit James Wright in the press box which I think is the worst infraction of all. That guy wouldn't have a spot on my beer league team with his offensive zone skills.

Which team owns his neg list rights? I would guess based on the fact that he's being contacted by three teams, nobody owns his rights.

Winnipeg one of three CFL teams showing an interest in Ohio Bobcats QB Tyler Tettleton. Montreal and Hamilton also after him.

Meant starters, not role players. And I would go as high as 15. You definitely took a bizarre approach to making it clear you meant only our starters. Next time, try not to emphasize the words ENTIRE TEAM if you mean half of it.

It would be less than 10 players? You're ridiculous. You mean to tell me that you think there are only 10 players on our team who could offer an improvement to someone's roster in ANY way, shape or form? I'd put the number closer to about 30-35. Just off the top of my head, Hall ... Ford ... Denmark ... Watson ... Etienne ... Poblah ... Kelly ... Greaves ... January ... Edwards ... Pencer ... Swiston ... Matthews ... Anderson ... Turner ... Gilmore ... Neufeld ... Mainor ... Muamba ... Wild ... Washington ... Dunn ... Jovon ... Sears ... Stewart ... Suber ... Pontbriand ... Volny ... Markett ... Kohlert (since you said before the expansion draft) ... Jones ... Thomas ... Peach ... Parenteau ... Lucas. There's 35 players who are no doubt NOT on their last job in the CFL unless they retire. If you had said major difference makers or guys who could START, maybe you'd have an argument. Maybe what you should have said was 10 players who would have an equal role to the one they have here. But guys who wouldn't make it onto active rosters as backups, special teams roleplayers, etc? Think again.

Jabari Arthur may have something to say about that. Just kidding.

Personally, I don't think it should matter if the ball is catchable or not. Interfering with the receiver should be called even if it's on the back side of the play IMHO. See the infraction. Throw the flag would make it a lot easier call for the refs who have to make determinations in probably in less than a second. It would also eliminate the 'but the ball wasn't even catchable' as well as the 'if he didn't interfere the receiver might have made it to the ball' arguments. I know I'm going to see the 'It doesn't affect the play if it's away from the ball' argument, but thats just letting the DB's away with cheating and the receiver may have been part of the play, but the QB went to the next read because of the interference. I'd also like to see the offensive PI called more. Lots of receivers push off while the ball is in the air and the almost never get called. So call it illegal contact on a receiver. I don't think they should ignore it if it happens, but call it properly. If a DB is manhandling a wideout but the ball is overthrown by a mile, then yeah .. it should be a 10 yard penalty, the ball shouldn't be placed at the spot of the foul.

Another thing they really need to improve their judgment on is what actually constitutes a catchable ball.

I guess if the definition of rookie has changed since I last looked, you may have a valid point. I'll look into it.

Siddall is Canadian (Winnipegger, actually) and Morris is American. PS Tracey is not a rookie.

Funny because he'd be one of my examples of why Howell wasn't a good coach. Maybe I need to reconsider.

As per official Bomber Twitter. Well ... I am underwhelmed heavily by us retaining Howell. Yet ANOTHER Canadian though. Hopefully I've just been wrong about his performance as a coach and a good QB will make it clear that he is capable of doing the job.

They're trying to drum up any interest they can. Wouldn't be surprised if they have a presser for Brendan Dunn where he comes out and rips his shirt off before motioning to the crowd for them to get loud.

I agree, you turn it into a 15 yard penalty and you'll see defensive backs taking guys down when they get beat deep just to avoid the big play. The call of pass interference is supposed to be made when illegally preventing a guy from catching a ball he legitimately has a chance to catch. Why would the penalty be any less than the result of actually in fact making that catch.

In other news ... O'Shea has requested league permission to wear these patches on our uniforms next year

... and BC. ... and Saskatchewan. ... and Edmonton. Come on DR CFL wake up.

Jesus, you can sure tell CFL execs ended their vacation today.

good

Getzlaf, Muamba, Laurent, Cornish, Harris But he's quite possibly 6.

How would you like to burn me a copy in exchange for the ability to ban one member of your choice from not only this site, but the internet in general? Just kidding. How would you like to burn me a copy in exchange for nothing of any value whatsoever other than the cost of postage and a blank DVD?

Not a knock on Mulumba, but as a NFL regular he's got a lot of work to do. He's an aggressive raw pass rusher and he'll make plays from time to time that make you go "WOW" but if you're watching the line of scrimmage to see who ISN'T doing their job, most of the time it was Mulumba unless he was blowing somebody up in the backfield. A lot of the read option San Francisco ran with Kaepernick was making Mulumba look like an absolute victim out there. He hasn't quite got that ability to predict the play down yet.

He was and still is a great ST coordinator. Probably the best one in the league. But the second best one is our head coach. So losing him isn't a huge hit and given the choice, I'd rather take Wylie. Would I want both of them? Obviously. But I'm not expecting to get that.