Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_262304
25 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

The ownership group in Atlanta should lobby for this.  They'd get a team a lot quicker (by emergency, desperate relocation) than waiting for the NHL to give them one. haha

As in, let Bettman announce that Atlanta franchise, hold the draft in Atlanta and then immediately relocate to Quebec due to 'unforeseen circumstances'...

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Views 126.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • This really pisses me off.  Teams like the Blues, Habs, and Bruins all hit a slight speed bump and they have no hesitation whatsoever in replacing the coach.  The Jets suck year-in and year-out and th

  • Where did Bill get $395 million?!?

  • What an idiot.  I have no patience for things like that.  Should be zero tolerance, 100-game ban for first offence, lifetime for second.  That's not an accident, that's not something that just happens

comment_262460
4 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

That's a good deal for Dallas. 

What happens if more than one goalie has a NMC?  Who can Dallas expose?  I assume they trade or buy out the other two but just wondering 

My understanding is that Bishop is their only goalie with a NMC and they have 4 others under contract who satisfy the exposure requirement.

Edited by Atomic

  • Author
comment_262465
1 minute ago, Atomic said:

My understanding is that Bishop is their only goalie with a NMC and they have 5 others under contract who satisfy the exposure requirement.

You could be right. Cap friendly shows one with a modified no movement and the other with a no trade. 

Have to assume they try to dump one or both this summer 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.