January 19, 20169 yr comment_179016 26 minutes ago, 17to85 said: He was on pace for 1100 yards basically in each season he was here.... that is good production when healthy. The entire team was allergic to the endzone, that's why we lost so many games so why get down on just moore for low td stats? That was a team wide problem but Moore was reliable in getting this team yards and helping at least move down the field. Yeah I'll cut him some slack for his productivity when healthy. It just seemed like we never got our money's worth out of him. For $360,000 I expected more than 4 TDs in 2 years. With all the hype surrounding this guy when we signed him he couldn't stay healthy and that was disappointing.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179037 Yes some times people let talent go away... the problem is that this team was plucking the proven losers from other rosters. I didn't think signing Darvin Adams was a bad move and he may still have a role... but if this team wants to get serious on upgrading talent at receiver then signing a Dressler immediately will boost the talent.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179065 14 hours ago, J5V said: Yeah I'll cut him some slack for his productivity when healthy. It just seemed like we never got our money's worth out of him. For $360,000 I expected more than 4 TDs in 2 years. With all the hype surrounding this guy when we signed him he couldn't stay healthy and that was disappointing. He was our best receiver and it wasn't really close, the only problem with him was that he couldn't stay healthy. Was worth paying him if not for his lack of health, not sure what the obsession is with the TDs, as I said, that was a team wide problem.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179068 The problem is consistency... with all of our receivers... Moore was great when healthy... but that wasn't often enough.... he also struggled to gain any YAC... Denmark looked liked a top receiver every now and then... then disappeared for multi-game stretches... Adams also looked great in about 5 or 6 games last year... where was he the other 12 games?
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179090 2 hours ago, bearpants said: The problem is consistency... with all of our receivers... Moore was great when healthy... but that wasn't often enough.... he also struggled to gain any YAC... Denmark looked liked a top receiver every now and then... then disappeared for multi-game stretches... Adams also looked great in about 5 or 6 games last year... where was he the other 12 games? It's pretty simple, Moore straight up hurt too much, Denmark has always been a complimentary guy, too much attention on him from a D and he's not as good and Adams is lazy and not as good as people wanted him to be. The solution is MOAR TALENT!
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179091 I wouldn't be upset if Adams stuck this year, I think with a better game plan, QB (Willy) and better talent spreading the defenses out a bit he could be good, but I would still bring in some bodies to compete for his spot. Very few jobs should be a lock anyways on a non playoff team
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179094 1 minute ago, sweep the leg said: Adams is a respectable 3rd option in a receiving corp. 100% agree. Your third option needs to be capable of 100+ yard games, but not relied upon to do it game in and game out. Adams can do that and he adds the extra benefit of being a very capable red zone target.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179095 Have Kohlert & JFG done enough to warrant the 4/5 spot or would you still try for 4 imports 1 NI?
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179096 2 minutes ago, Taynted_Fayth said: Have Kohlert & JFG done enough to warrant the 4/5 spot or would you still try for 4 imports 1 NI? I'm thinking you're going to see those 4 & 5 spots being rotated more than you've seen before.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179097 especially if Richards finally comes into play. Im really hoping for big things from him and waggoner this year
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179115 1 hour ago, Mike said: 100% agree. Your third option needs to be capable of 100+ yard games, but not relied upon to do it game in and game out. Adams can do that and he adds the extra benefit of being a very capable red zone target. I'd rather he be the 4th option.
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179119 Adams was frustrating last year because he'd show things that made you go "Wow!" but then he'd completely disappear. If he could show up consistently......
January 19, 20169 yr comment_179142 2 hours ago, Noeller said: Adams was frustrating last year because he'd show things that made you go "Wow!" but then he'd completely disappear. If he could show up consistently...... He'd never have made it to FA last year?
January 20, 20169 yr comment_179187 21 hours ago, sweep the leg said: Adams is a respectable 3rd option in a receiving corp. Denmark is a respectable 3rd option.
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment