Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 162
  • Views 16.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • WBBFanWest
    WBBFanWest

    Do you really think that many of us care about what one anonymous internet posters thinks about the credentials of another anonymous internet poster.  Because if you do, stand by for disappointment.  

  • You know you've denied it in the past but more and more it really just comes across that you're insanely jealous of Mike... which begs the question... why the **** would anyone be jealous of Mike?

  • Bombers claimed rights to yantz who will be at training camp. Great move

comment_119143

I would have liked Waud at 11 and Richards is probably still here at 15... Morgan only makes me nervous b/c I'm never heard of him but hopefully he turns out to be a good one... it just seems to me like Waud fills a need better... giving us to option to play 2 NIs on the D-line in certain situations...

 

I suspect once Hardy went off the board at 10 they didn't feel they could take that chance.

comment_119149

 

I would have liked Waud at 11 and Richards is probably still here at 15... Morgan only makes me nervous b/c I'm never heard of him but hopefully he turns out to be a good one... it just seems to me like Waud fills a need better... giving us to option to play 2 NIs on the D-line in certain situations...

 

I suspect once Hardy went off the board at 10 they didn't feel they could take that chance.

 

 

You're probably right... I wonder if they de-valued Durant so much that they wouldn't take the chance that one of those two guys would be available at 15...

comment_119150

 

 

I would have liked Waud at 11 and Richards is probably still here at 15... Morgan only makes me nervous b/c I'm never heard of him but hopefully he turns out to be a good one... it just seems to me like Waud fills a need better... giving us to option to play 2 NIs on the D-line in certain situations...

 

I suspect once Hardy went off the board at 10 they didn't feel they could take that chance.

 

 

You're probably right... I wonder if they de-valued Durant so much that they wouldn't take the chance that one of those two guys would be available at 15...

 

 

Had they gone Waud / Durant (or even Richards).. I would have been much more satisfied today than I am.  

 

I "get" the character concerns and that Durant's interviews weren't the best .. on sheer talent, he's the guy I would have preferred .. and you can never be too deep on either line when it comes to NI talent.

comment_119165

I would have been happy with Waud/Richards... I'm not trying to bury Morgan or anything, I admittedly know nothing about him and his lack of name recognition is the only reason I'm sceptical about him... but I read some promising scouting reports and I liked a lot of the stuff I saw on his highlight tape... my only concern is on some of the plays he may have benefited from playing against CIS talent... 

 

Does anyone know why Maxx Forde free-fell (is that the proper past tense for free-fall??)... I thought most mocks had him in the 2nd round or so...

comment_119179

Now that the anticipation of draft day is over (and satisfaction never equals anticipation) we have cleared another target date on the way to Training Camp. And that's where the excitement really gets amped up big time.

Sunday May 31st is the official start of TC.

17 more sleeps.

 Does anyone know why Maxx Forde free-fell (is that the proper past tense for free-fall??)....

I'll say Tom Petty knows best when it comes to free-falling.

Besides, if you free-fell in the forest, would anybody hear?

comment_119199

Team by Team Selections:

 

BC Lions
 
1-5  - Mrabure-Ajufo, Ese (DL)
2-14 - Boyko, Brett (OL)
3-23 - Murray-Lawrence, Shaquille (RB)
4-32 - Clarke, Adrian (LB)
5-41 - Allison, Campbell (OL)
5-43 - Covington, Christian (DL)
6-49 - Brinkworth, Joshua (DB)
7-58 - Forde, Maxx (DL)
 
Edmonton Eskimos
 
1-7  - Groulx, Danny (OL)
2-16 - Beard, David (OL)
3-25 - Konar, Adam (LB)
4-34 - Johnson, Andrew (WR)
7-60 - Smith, Blair (LB)
 
Calgary Stampeders
 
1-9  - Lavoie, Karl (OL)
2-18 - Durant, Lemar (WR)
3-19 - Varga, Tyler (RB)
3-22 - Campbell, Tevaughn (DB)
3-27 - Langlais, William (FB)
5-44 - Janke, Dexter (DB)
6-53 - Picton, Aaron (OL)
7-62 - Buckley, Andrew (QB)
 
Saskatchewan Roughriders
 
1-6  - Demski, Nic (WR)
3-26 - Connop, Rory (DL)
4-35 - Rea, Matt (RB)
5-42 - Adjei, Kwame (DB)
6-47 - Langlais, Tyler (DL)
6-50 - Abankwah, Melvin (RB)
7-59 - Tennant, Brandon (DL)
 
Winnipeg Blue Bombers
 
1-2  - Chungh, Sukh (OL)
2-11 - Richards, Addison (WR)
2-15 - Morgan, Brendan (DB)
4-33 - Normand, Christophe (RB)
5-38 - Lattanzio, Ettore (DL)
6-46 - Warden, Justin (DL)
 
Toronto Argonauts
 
1-3  - McEwan, Sean (OL)
2-12 - Waud, Darryl (DL)
3-21 - Walker, Cameron (DL)
4-30 - Norzil, Matt (WR)
5-39 - Campbell, Dillon (RB)
7-55 - Bradfield, Kevin (WR)
7-56 - MacDonald, Dan (LS)
 
Hamilton Tiger-Cats
 
2-17 - Archambault, Byron (LB)
3-20 - Langa, Jonathan (LB)
4-29 - Omara, Ron (LB)
6-51 - Ellefsen, Everett (DL)
6-52 - English, Daniel (WR)
7-61 - Huggins, Preston (LB)
 
Ottawa REDBLACKS
 
1-1  - Mateas, Alex (OL)
2-10 - Harty, Jake (WR)
4-28 - Doll, Tanner (LB)
5-37 - Court, Jefferson (FB)
6-46 - Lafrance, Kienan (RB)
7-54 - Laganiere, Alexandre (OL)
 
Montreal Alouettes
 
1-4  - Ackie, Chris (DB)
1-8  - Ruby, Jacob (OL)
2-13 - Shortill, Nick (LB)
3-24 - Bodanis, James (OL) 
4-31 - Bridge, Brandon (QB)
4-39 - Charette, Alex (WR)
5-40 - Davidson, Mikhail (WR)
6-48 - Lawlor, Quinn (DB)
7-57 - Coady, Anthony (DB)
comment_119269

 

 

Bombers could have gotten Morgan in the 3rd or 4th so what looked like a genius move in swapping picks with the Riders in the Watson trade now seems kind of wasted.

Impossible to say. I'm not happy about the Morgan pick either because that's not who I wanted to see, but we can't say "so and so would've been available" - it's pretty obvious that draft boards don't play out anywhere near what the media and fans expect.

So while I'm not thrilled with the pick, it can't be called a waste at this point.

 

Agreed it's impossible to say, but I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't think we got the expected value out of that pick that I was hoping for, especially considering how much Walters was pumping how great this draft was.  

 

After sleeping on it though, I think Walters had a solid draft, but he didn't hit a home-run like I was hoping for.  A home-run for me would have been Chungh, Demski and Shortill. That would have been an A+ in my books.  Instead, I give Walters a B.  

 

 

How could Walters have picked Demski and Shortfall at 11 and 15 when they were already gone?  You may as well say they should have picked Mateas, Chungh and McEwan.

comment_119270

Bombers could have gotten Morgan in the 3rd or 4th so what looked like a genius move in swapping picks with the Riders in the Watson trade now seems kind of wasted.

Impossible to say. I'm not happy about the Morgan pick either because that's not who I wanted to see, but we can't say "so and so would've been available" - it's pretty obvious that draft boards don't play out anywhere near what the media and fans expect.

So while I'm not thrilled with the pick, it can't be called a waste at this point.

Agreed it's impossible to say, but I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't think we got the expected value out of that pick that I was hoping for, especially considering how much Walters was pumping how great this draft was.

After sleeping on it though, I think Walters had a solid draft, but he didn't hit a home-run like I was hoping for. A home-run for me would have been Chungh, Demski and Shortill. That would have been an A+ in my books. Instead, I give Walters a B.

How could Walters have picked Demski and Shortfall at 11 and 15 when they were already gone? You may as well say they should have picked Mateas, Chungh and McEwan.

I'm saying that would have been a home run draft. But obviously Walters can't control who is picked where.

Create an account or sign in to comment