January 21, 20169 yr comment_179365 15 minutes ago, Taynted_Fayth said: the storyline to genysis wasn't overly complicated if you've watched the other movies or are an avid fan of the previous movies, but I can see how someone who isn't or misses a little of the beginning could sit there with a big ? written across their face, and nothing is worse then watching something you don't understand. RE: Baywatch a big ol MEH from me, thought the show was dumb (not to say i didnt watch the slow motion running scenes as a kid ) RE: Star Wars, i weould have thought the December release date was the original target date, xmas around the corner can only mean merchandise $$ in a frenzy Timeline was pretty tight for Star Wars too. They just started principle shooting so its not that tight. But given the success of TFA, it makes sense to keep the same release date and to allow for the anticipation to build up all throughout 2017. Provides a better buffer between Rogue One and Episode VIII. Baywatch could be fun. I was never a fan of the show although I remember watching the pilot (see how old I am?) which was pretty different from the actual series. Rock is a smart guy and he and Effron together should be a lot of fun.
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179373 1 hour ago, Logan007 said: I liked 1-3. 4 was meh and 5 was absolute crap. I've made my comments on 4 clear. 5 was not as bad as I heard it was. Sadly they went with that blue filter look for the movie. Could have set up Jai as the new Die Hard. I'm still waiting for Die Hard on a boat - that could be awesome.
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179374 1 minute ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: I've made my comments on 4 clear. 5 was not as bad as I heard it was. Sadly they went with that blue filter look for the movie. Could have set up Jai as the new Die Hard. I'm still waiting for Die Hard on a boat - that could be awesome. i think it was called under seige Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179375 Just now, Taynted_Fayth said: i think it was called under seige Yeah but im thinking more like fixing up what Speed 2 could have been.
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179377 If they had just kept the Die Hard formula it would have worked. Even the idea that its ridiculous for the same thing to happen to the same guy 3 or 4 or 5 times, thats the hook! And keep John as just a regular good cop, not a friggen action star. The one great thing about casting Bruce Willis was that he was known for his comedy roles (Moonlighting). And people were angry, thinking it was a joke. He helped usher in the new era of action starts that were sensitive and "average" as opposed to muscleheads. Whomever they cast as young John, they should look to people with strong comedic timing, not an action star.
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179383 Seems like they went every route with willis' character, 1 & 2 was with his wife(ex), 3 was paired up with a joe nobody (jackson) 4 was with his daughter and partnered up with justin long, then 5 was with his son. unless his parents are to be slated for a prequel, seems his introduction in the first die hard was he was just an average NYC cop, not a warrior against terrorists
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179424 http://www.polygon.com/2016/1/21/10805758/heres-how-bruce-willis-will-appear-in-die-hard-year-one
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179428 Im not sure who I'd cast as a young McClane, Willis himself was 33 in Die Hard (1988) but the character might be older and i cant really think of anyone in their 30s fitting that bill Joseph Gordon-Levitt is 34 Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179430 LOL wait they did that movie looper together playing the same guy maybe this guy, ben lil bro casey Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179431 The new Die hard is supposed to be ten years before the first film. So look at someone early 20's
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179433 in that case I like Evan Peters from American Horror Story, hes a good actor just pleeeeease please dont be shia labeouf Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179436 I'd cast someone more known for comedy and try to recapture what made Bruce Willis so awesome in the first place.
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179438 that's a tough stipulation to cast, most young people are pretty cut and dry one style or another, its usually later in their careers onces the've been established they try 180's on their roles. couple of the few that are a little of both action humor are a little too old already, like Chris Hemsworth, Chris Pine, tom Hardy Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179440 Zac Efron wouldnt be bad if he wasnt so darn handsome. Too handsome for this role.
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179443 I watched Escobar: Paradise Lost yesterday, the older brother from the Space Jumanji, Zathura, might have been in a Hunger Games too, but he was the main character in Escobar, he wasnt bad in that movie Josh Hutcherson, hes 23 Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179464 16 minutes ago, Brandon said: Seth Rogan should play John McClane! Go to hell Brandon...go...to...hell....
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179476 2 hours ago, Taynted_Fayth said: I watched Escobar: Paradise Lost yesterday, the older brother from the Space Jumanji, Zathura, might have been in a Hunger Games too, but he was the main character in Escobar, he wasnt bad in that movie Josh Hutcherson, hes 23 He's also 5'nothing.
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179477 lol might be but camera angles did wonders for stallone this is the Escobar trailer, even tho the movie came out in 2014, with some camera love i think he could play the part of a young McClane as a young cop 10 years of NYC crime made him into the older shoe leather mcclane lol Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Taynted_Fayth
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179479 If there's one thing Stallone's "Expendables" tried to tell us, is that there's too many p*ssies trying to be action heroes (Hutcherson...Ephron...seriously??) these days. Back in the day, it was legit tough guys like Stallone, Willis, Arnold and others. You wanna do a prequel for DH, fine....but make it a tough guy....make it a man. Edited January 21, 20169 yr by Noeller
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179481 4 minutes ago, Noeller said: If there's one thing Stallone's "Expendables" tried to tell us, is that there's too many ******* trying to be action heroes (Hutcherson...Ephron...seriously??) these days. Back in the day, it was legit tough guys like Stallone, Willis, Arnold and others. You wanna do a prequel for DH, fine....but make it a tough guy....make it a man. I dont disagree but you aint gonna find too many ppl that could probably fit the bill and be believable to Bruce Willis (who will be in the movie too) maybe Ryan Reynolds back when he did Van Wilder?
January 21, 20169 yr comment_179484 Here's a pic of young Bruce. If Die Hard 6 is him at this age then who should play him? Efron? Edited January 21, 20169 yr by FrostyWinnipeg
January 21, 20169 yr Author comment_179491 LOL! look at that hair! reminds me of when I cut a chuck of my hair in the front in elementary school trying to pull off the "Edward Furlong as John Connor" look
January 22, 20169 yr comment_179515 5 hours ago, Noeller said: If there's one thing Stallone's "Expendables" tried to tell us, is that there's too many p*ssies trying to be action heroes (Hutcherson...Ephron...seriously??) these days. Back in the day, it was legit tough guys like Stallone, Willis, Arnold and others. You wanna do a prequel for DH, fine....but make it a tough guy....make it a man. You mean like the TV actor lead in a comedy drama like bruce Willis was in the 80's? Yup. Big action star. That's the gist of our discussion that they should not be casting an action star and trying to capture what made die hard cool and bruce Willis and "new" kind of so called action star
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment