Posted December 6, 201410 yr comment_98569 With 3 Jets D-men out with injuries and Buff back on D the Jets could be giving out a lot presents early this Christmas.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98598 With 3 Jets D-men out with injuries and Buff back on D the Jets could be giving out a lot presents early this Christmas. If you meant presents for the fans, you're right.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98600 Roy is a legend but letting his team goon it up is classless. When they keep ending up with a power play, why stop.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98604 Roy is a legend but letting his team goon it up is classless. He pulled the same crap when he was coaching junior. Fantastic goalie, douchebag coach.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98605 Lets trade a few guys for some 4th liners? Good game IMO. Impressed that with guys being out the team came out and killed it. Not world beaters but a great effort.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98616 Buff might stay on D. But again it shows he's expendable. I'd still pick up brunner. It will be a different story against the Ducks.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98618 Roy is a legendary goon. So many screws loose in that man's head. Always has been. Serious rage issues. Fun game, good job team.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98619 Chairot might be better than Enstrom and Buff played better than Bogo tonight. Good game Jets, next man up truly ...
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98635 Buff might stay on D. But again it shows he's expendable. I'd still pick up brunner. It will be a different story against the Ducks. How about giving the Buff trade thing a rest for awhile?
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98641 Buff might stay on D. But again it shows he's expendable. I'd still pick up brunner. It will be a different story against the Ducks.How about giving the Buff trade thing a rest for awhile?Calm down. Someone mentioned trades and I replied. Take a deep breath and relax.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98646 Buff might stay on D. But again it shows he's expendable. I'd still pick up brunner. It will be a different story against the Ducks.How about giving the Buff trade thing a rest for awhile?Calm down. Someone mentioned trades and I replied. Take a deep breath and relax. nah...I'm calm...by the way...Buff's not going anywhere.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98647 Buff might stay on D. But again it shows he's expendable. I'd still pick up brunner. It will be a different story against the Ducks.How about giving the Buff trade thing a rest for awhile?Calm down. Someone mentioned trades and I replied. Take a deep breath and relax. nah...I'm calm...by the way...Buff's not going anywhere. CALM DOWN!!!!
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98651 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98653 I don't care what they do in the off season with Buff as long as they fire the assistant coaches and announce it the day after the season ends.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98654 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less. Big huge dude with a nasty streak that can play both forward or D without missing a beat.... Ya we should trade that guy. Weird but ok.
December 6, 201410 yr comment_98669 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less. I don't understand this. Why do you continue to push your agenda re: Byfuglien being traded when you've made it clear that it's not up for discussion? You're not going to change your mind. We get it. You want to see Byfuglien get traded. No matter what.
December 7, 201410 yr comment_98674 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less. I don't understand this. Why do you continue to push your agenda re: Byfuglien being traded when you've made it clear that it's not up for discussion? You're not going to change your mind. We get it. You want to see Byfuglien get traded. No matter what. It makes like zero sense. Jets 2.0 started as a 1 line team.... Did what they said theyd do and got a second line.... continued on their path and got a 3rd line. Keep doing what their doing, If and its a huge giant if....something comes across for Buff or Kane that actually gets us a top ill say a top 4 because lines change... then no you dont make that trade.... you continue on the path you set out for. Trading for the sake of trading is a giant bad idea in todays NHL.
December 7, 201410 yr comment_98693 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less. I don't understand this. Why do you continue to push your agenda re: Byfuglien being traded when you've made it clear that it's not up for discussion? You're not going to change your mind. We get it. You want to see Byfuglien get traded. No matter what. I find this hilarious. Someone mentions me wanting him traded. I reply and then people like you go on about me pushing this idea. for example, you make a statement that is factually wrong based off the idea that you're always right about everything. I'll give you credit, you're spot on with Bombers opinion. Not so much hockey. I think trading Buff is best for the jets because he is the best asset for getting a high return. He's a phenomenal player. If the jets were a strong playoff team then he'd be worth more to the team here. But if the jets are not going to compete at a high level for 3 more years then I believe the law of diminishing returns forces the jets hand in making the trade. Personally I'd be thrilled if buff was a jet the rest of his career. I'm a huge fan. Now I've explained it once again. Can we please knock it off now? Thanks!
December 7, 201410 yr comment_98694 If the team continues to play well they should not trade him until the off season. But they should trade him. Unless they can resign him for less. I don't understand this. Why do you continue to push your agenda re: Byfuglien being traded when you've made it clear that it's not up for discussion? You're not going to change your mind. We get it. You want to see Byfuglien get traded. No matter what. It makes like zero sense. Jets 2.0 started as a 1 line team.... Did what they said theyd do and got a second line.... continued on their path and got a 3rd line. Keep doing what their doing, If and its a huge giant if....something comes across for Buff or Kane that actually gets us a top ill say a top 4 because lines change... then no you dont make that trade.... you continue on the path you set out for. Trading for the sake of trading is a giant bad idea in todays NHL. Exactly correct. And I never said trade for the sake of trade. I agree with you. Please let's not put words in my mouth. Thanks.
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment