October 2, 20241 yr comment_727367 5 minutes ago, wbbfan said: That said, the last 4 gc winners and 6/8 gc finalists have been run to throw teams. The Hamilton style of pass first run never hasn’t worked in a long time. Indoor GC this year...could very well change that...
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727369 Hamiltons pass game has been maybe the best in the league. Their D however, has been the dead last in terms of total points, offensive points, tds, first downs and second worst in passing tds. While also giving up the second most passing and rushing first downs, 2nd worst 2nd conversion rate, a qbr against of almost 100, while being neck and neck with us in pretty much all run stopping categories. We are +7 on turnovers compared to Hamilton, +7 in big plays, while they have a slight edge in pass pro and pass rushing. If any secondary or D can slow down Hamilton, it’s us. And their D weaknesses line up very well with our strengths. I don’t think they can slow us down or shoot it out with us unless we play down to them. I don’t think we will put a 50 burger up again, but I think the play on the field with be pretty one sided in our favour.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727370 5 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Indoor GC this year...could very well change that... It’ll make it easier for the teams in the gc to pass more, but that doesn’t help them to get to the gc. Montreal has been much more pass heavy this year, and they will walk into the east final with ease. But I bet they run it 20 times in that game. And I don’t think any other pass only offence will sniff a division final.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727373 3 hours ago, Fatty Liver said: Willy needs help, nobody has stepped up to replace Jeffcoat who was a handful to contend with on every play, the pass rush has become a secondary function. Garbutt has had the occasional flash... but nothing near the consistency of Jeffcoat... I agree that's it's nice our secondary can play well without a pass rush... but it bothers me to think how good the D could be if we had consistent pressure on the QB
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727374 2 minutes ago, bearpants said: Garbutt has had the occasional flash... but nothing near the consistency of Jeffcoat... I agree that's it's nice our secondary can play well without a pass rush... but it bothers me to think how good the D could be if we had consistent pressure on the QB Garbutt is ok but they need someone who can rip under a tackle and disrupt the pocket. We basically play basketball defense with our front, try to disrupt passing lanes but never get after the QB off the snap.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727375 4 hours ago, Piggy 1 said: BLM looked really good against BC. Gotta get after him, make him cry. Agreed. If Bo-Levi gets enough time, he will pick apart even the Bomber defensive backfield. Flushing him out of the pocket would be a very good thing.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727376 27 minutes ago, Tracker said: Agreed. If Bo-Levi gets enough time, he will pick apart even the Bomber defensive backfield. Flushing him out of the pocket would be a very good thing. Didn’t you say this about MBT and pretty much every other QB we have played. Gets old.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727380 50 minutes ago, Tracker said: Agreed. If Bo-Levi gets enough time, he will pick apart even the Bomber defensive backfield. Flushing him out of the pocket would be a very good thing. Nah. The first meeting of the year he went 14/28 220 yards and we didn’t pressure him then. It was close because that was maybe Zachs worst game of the year, and his last bad game. Milanovich will know he’s gonna have time, and both he and bo have film against us this year which gives them an advantage in prep. But at the end of the day, not running the ball plays into the hands of our D more than us not pressuring the pocket plays into Hamilton offence. Also, if we swap haba for fox and rotate the dl we probably see the best pressure front of the year.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727383 20 minutes ago, wbbfan said: It was close because that was maybe Zachs worst game of the year, and his last bad game That was also the first game the ticats had with ******* Jones at DC right. Maybe had an impact.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727385 2 minutes ago, 17to85 said: That was also the first game the ticats had with ******* Jones at DC right. Maybe had an impact. Jones does tend to have a quick impact on D like that as a dc, yeah. Big advantage for them and they used it well.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727386 1 hour ago, Goalie said: Didn’t you say this about MBT and pretty much every other QB we have played. Gets old.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727387 36 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: I’m a younger guy and for the life of me I don’t get ppl who wake up and choose anger or negativity over positivity and happiness.
October 2, 20241 yr comment_727393 3 hours ago, bearpants said: Garbutt has had the occasional flash... but nothing near the consistency of Jeffcoat... I agree that's it's nice our secondary can play well without a pass rush... but it bothers me to think how good the D could be if we had consistent pressure on the QB Don't let little things like that bother you. I let big things bother me, like we didn't win a game in Regina in my 20s. That bothers me
October 2, 20241 yr Author comment_727394 3 minutes ago, brett_c_b said: Don't let little things like that bother you. I let big things bother me, like we didn't win a game in Regina in my 20s. That bothers me It doesn't bother me that ******* Dinwiddie could've ran for the first down instead of throwing it to James Johnson.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727395 4 minutes ago, Nolby said: It doesn't bother me that ******* Dinwiddie could've ran for the first down instead of throwing it to James Johnson. Or if turners were automatically reviewed then it would not of counted.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727403 I do feel this game has potential kinda let down vibes. I mean coming off of a game where you put up 55 and you could have put up 70, and after clinching a playoff spot but bombers know how to win these late season games. Ticats tho have more to play for. Still sense a W but doubt we see 55 points or even close. I think 33 to 20 type of game. Close but only cuz cats score a garbage time TD Bo will throw for his 300 yards but a couple costly picks will be the cats downfall. Look for Bonds to make a statement this week. Edited October 3, 20241 yr by Goalie
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727408 Finally, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers can clinch first place in the West Division for the fourth straight year with a win over Hamilton if the Roughriders lose to Edmonton. The team can still make some headway with a loss this week as it’ll clinch a home playoff game if either Saskatchewan or B.C. lose their respective games. So says 3 down nation. maybe we put up 56 this week.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727416 No changes for the first time this year although Demski is a Game Time Decision
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727418 14 hours ago, brett_c_b said: Don't let little things like that bother you. I let big things bother me, like we didn't win a game in Regina in my 20s. That bothers me well it doesn't bother me like keeps me up at night... I just imagine how dominant the D could be with a legit pass rush Edited October 3, 20241 yr by bearpants
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727421 20 minutes ago, bearpants said: well it doesn't bother me like keeps me up at night... I just imagine how dominant the D could be with a legit pass rush A dominant pass rush AND our secondary? Oh my.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727422 If Demski can’t go I think they should move Clercius inside and bump Lucky out to wideout.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727423 1 minute ago, HardCoreBlue said: A dominant pass rush AND our secondary? Oh my.
October 3, 20241 yr comment_727424 It would be neat to see how that defense performs when they aren't spotted a 28 point lead but I wouldn't complain if we don't find out like last week.
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment