1 hour ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

The way some of these were going up I was thinking his might be the only one to go for the minimum lol. Can always change a name bar 😁

MOURTADA… you just buy an E and change it to MORE TD. 😅

Edited October 9, 20214 yr by M.O.A.B.

Was hoping that they would go for 2 on that last TD. If they had done so, I think that they would have scored in every possible way. 

Touchdown, extra-point conversion, rouge, and safety. Other than different variations of TDs (passing, rushing, defensive), I think the only thing missing was a two point conversion. 

 

7 minutes ago, JCon said:

Was hoping that they would go for 2 on that last TD. If they had done so, I think that they would have scored in every possible way. 

Touchdown, extra-point conversion, rouge, and safety. Other than different variations of TDs (passing, rushing, defensive), I think the only thing missing was a two point conversion. 

 

I thought made more sense when they had 8 to go for 2 to get 10

all we needed to beat Edmonton yesterday were two safeties, but we got an insurance third safety just to be "safe"...lol...

Their offence gave up more than they scored...ouch

3 hours ago, JCon said:

Was hoping that they would go for 2 on that last TD. If they had done so, I think that they would have scored in every possible way. 

Touchdown, extra-point conversion, rouge, and safety. Other than different variations of TDs (passing, rushing, defensive), I think the only thing missing was a two point conversion. 

 

And they should've had a pick 6 early in the game...dude was already having visions of himself in the end zone...

Is it just me or is Darvin starting to fade a bit? Lawler is damn good and proves very fast that he's an elite receiver but it wasn't too long ago that Darvin was our guy. Maybe the rest of our offense has caught up to their potential skill level or Darvin has slowed down a tad.

Darvin had a real down game when it came to catching the ball.  Easy to see he wasn’t happy with himself at all. 

Hopefully an off night and not a trend.

Darvin is the leader of the WR room. If he does not block the way he does not be the typical WR diva for not getting the ball 10 - 15 a game there is not the buy in from the younger games.

Darvin Adams still blocks like a berserker but the rest of his game is significantly below  what it was. Even good guys are not immune from aging

How many PI's has Adams drawn though? It feels like he's drawing a PI every second game.

Adams was also wide open in the end zone on the throw to Bailey on the play before the Demski touchdown.  If the ball had been thrown to Adams, that was a sure TD for him.

3 minutes ago, Sard said:

Adams was also wide open in the end zone on the throw to Bailey on the play before the Demski touchdown.  If the ball had been thrown to Adams, that was a sure TD for him.

Yup. Saw the same thing. Wide open. 

2 hours ago, Sard said:

Adams was also wide open in the end zone on the throw to Bailey on the play before the Demski touchdown.  If the ball had been thrown to Adams, that was a sure TD for him.

Only if he catches it. Also by the time the ball is in the air and the camera pans the d has shifted.

Collaros was 1 for 8 throwing to Darvin. He had a good 4 bad drops. Just 18 for 37 throwing to him this year.

Darvin is bowman esq this year. 

35 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

Only if he catches it. Also by the time the ball is in the air and the camera pans the d has shifted.

Collaros was 1 for 8 throwing to Darvin. He had a good 4 bad drops. Just 18 for 37 throwing to him this year.

Darvin is bowman esq this year. 

Saw it live from the upper deck, he was wide open before Collaros even rolled out.  If he had seen Adams, it was an easy pitch and catch.  Yes, Adams would have had to make the catch, but it's not very often that a receiver drops one like that. 

 

Nah, he was an easy TD on that one. Bsck corner open by 15 yards.

Don't think Collaros saw him.