June 13, 20196 yr comment_396956 Just now, JuranBoldenRules said: Result shouldn't matter. That should be an easy call for the ref as soon as the flag leaves the pocket....no accidental contact there, that was very purposeful. Result makes it easy though
June 13, 20196 yr comment_396957 Just now, Bomber_fanaddict said: They forgot to mention Fajardo has to run because his oline sucks balls He has no desire to throw either.
June 13, 20196 yr comment_396958 Just now, BBlink said: Result makes it easy though They need to penalize the blatant disregard for head contact, the intent to injure. Doesn't have to be based on whether it was successful in injuring the opponent.
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396959 Just now, AKAChip said: He has no desire to throw either. Desire vs ability
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396960 Just now, JuranBoldenRules said: They need to penalize the blatant disregard for head contact, the intent to injure. Doesn't have to be based on whether it was successful in injuring the opponent. Considering it was Lawrence, you can't help but think that it was part of the gameplan going into to hit him in the head first chance they got to try to take him out of the game.
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396961 1 minute ago, Geebrr said: Desire vs ability He has no desire because he has no ability.
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396964 Just now, Geebrr said: "big Golden State fan" Sure, circa 2014 Kinda like Rider fans circa 2007
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396966 If a head shot knocks out starting qb, the team that did the headshot should be penalized by benching their starter. only half kidding.
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396967 45 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Fajardo is gonna get a receiver kille dhe keeps throwing high Throwing anywhere, just awful
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396968 13 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: They need to penalize the blatant disregard for head contact, the intent to injure. Doesn't have to be based on whether it was successful in injuring the opponent. I absolutely agree with you. Intent to injure is the part that is subjective. Making it controversial. Making the defensive player that made head contact sit out for the same amount of time of the injured player is purely objective Edited June 14, 20196 yr by BBlink
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396972 Just now, Mark F said: tigercats front looks pretty weak so far Well William Powell is the second best back in the league... so there’s that
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396973 1 minute ago, Floyd said: Sask going to have two 1000 yard receivers I heard... 2000 pass receiving yards total in 2019 Edited June 14, 20196 yr by Geebrr
June 14, 20196 yr Author comment_396974 Wonder if Steinhauer should have challenged that incompletion
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396975 3 minutes ago, BBlink said: I absolutely agree with you. Intent to injure is the part that is subjective. Making it controversial. Making the defensive player that make head contact sit out for the same amount of time of the injured player is purely objective Not exactly. What if it's career ending? Referees presumably have experience and know the sport. Much like a judge who would differentiate between acts based on intent. They need to be able to make that call, it's not black and white.
June 14, 20196 yr comment_396976 There goes Suitor ad libbing again. It’s uncanny how he knows what the players are thinking..
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment