May 4, 20187 yr comment_328629 Demski and Coates start, Simonise and Wolitarsky backup. Petermann starts on the PR. Looks good.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328630 Just now, Atomic said: Demski and Coates start, Simonise and Wolitarsky backup. Petermann starts on the PR. Looks good. Depth is good.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328631 4 minutes ago, wbbfan said: two guys with good and great size and fantastic athletic ability at a position we havent had a strong contributor in years, and may start two nis at. Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328632 1 minute ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Wasn't Henry cut at mini camp?
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328633 Just now, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Henry and plamondon were TCF last year. This is how you build depth though. pile up talent and let the best fight to the top. like we did on the OL.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328634 Just now, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Just curious.. Who would you have taken and why.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328636 7 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. So you acknowledge we're shaky at receiver but upset we drafted two receivers. Edited May 4, 20187 yr by Atomic
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328637 1 minute ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. When I start thinking you’re being unnecessarily negative... umm... just sayin ha
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328639 Blazko may soon be released and Henry and Thera-Plamondon are going to be in tough to make the team. Its like as Atomic stated earlier: Demski and Coates start, Wolitarsky and Simonise backup, Peterman on the PR. Maybe one other NI WR on the PR.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328640 1 minute ago, rebusrankin said: Blazko may soon be released and Henry and Thera-Plamondon are going to be in tough to make the team. Its like as Atomic stated earlier: Demski and Coates start, Wolitarsky and Simonise backup, Peterman on the PR. Maybe one other NI WR on the PR. Simonise, wolitarsky and petermann have star potential. TP henry dont. blazko has some potential but not as much.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328643 I really like the dumouchel pick... Great move not the draft I would have done but I don’t hate it
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328644 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Edmonton scooped us with Tanner Green too. Not a fan of AGD. green would have been nice yeah. Hes a gigantic man with decent feet. I dont like the idea of him at guard. Just now, Floyd said: I really like the dumouchel pick... Great move not the draft I would have done but I don’t hate it Upside for days. Big and nasty. And he is going back to college.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328645 3 minutes ago, Atomic said: So you acknowledge we're shaky at reveiver but upset we drafted two receivers. I don't mind 1. I don't like 2, especially with our first 2 picks. Not really hard to comprehend.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328648 1 minute ago, Mike said: Imagine TBURGESS being negative, I for one am shocked Been saving it up for a few months now. It's got to feel good to be back at it.
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328649 I’m bummed out because I was fully prepared to make fun of sask for picking simonise...
May 4, 20187 yr comment_328651 Just now, Mike said: Imagine TBURGESS being negative, I for one am shocked I wasn't negative about the first receiver. I became negative about 2 with the top 2 picks. Imagine having a different opinion than the Bombers and then having to watch the cheerleaders around here complain about it. We've now got 8 NI receivers, only 2 of which have even a little bit of CFL experience. Well 3 if you include Wolo's catch. LOL
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment