Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_294904
6 minutes ago, Floyd said:

Ah porter draws in - so foketi and him should sit?

poop and Nevis in the middle?

The depth chart has jake starting at DT again, also only has us with 5 wrs.  JFG, adams, denny, lankford, and coates. Obviously flanders / harris will move in and around slot spots. But man i dont like that lack of depth at wr. Football gods help us if a wr goes down. Or harris. 

The depth chart has us carrying 8 ol, so im sure foketi will be one of the 2 scratches. 

  • Replies 166
  • Views 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Was never a doubt in my mind as I watched that game that Winnipeg would win. Was closer on the scoreboard than the field. Medlock was replaced by a doppelganger or they run away early. I would also pe

  • Taynted_Fayth
    Taynted_Fayth

    I thought Maas was relatively calm this game. The only thing I thought was he looked like he was gonna cry after randle broke up that 3rd down pass to seal the game. I seen a few teary eyes in my day,

  • It's hard to ignore the difference JSK has had on this defence. Another 10 tackles tonight. 

comment_294915
1 hour ago, wbbfan said:

The depth chart has jake starting at DT again, also only has us with 5 wrs.  JFG, adams, denny, lankford, and coates. Obviously flanders / harris will move in and around slot spots. But man i dont like that lack of depth at wr. Football gods help us if a wr goes down. Or harris. 

The depth chart has us carrying 8 ol, so im sure foketi will be one of the 2 scratches. 

Poop not on there?

comment_294916
13 minutes ago, Floyd said:

Poop not on there?

Hes listed on the roster but isnt starting. 

https://d3ham790trbkqy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2017/09/Depth-at-Edmonton-Sept-30-UPDATED.pdf

^ good guys

https://d3ham790trbkqy.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/09/Roster-Depth-Chart-BB-2.pdf

^ green guys

Edited by wbbfan

comment_294929
25 minutes ago, Floyd said:

I don't understand this at all...  Why do you need Porter and Fogg as DIs - unless someone's nicked up

 

We seldom make good use of the DI spots on off or def. 

4 minutes ago, Mark F said:

good discussion on OB pregame about the Bombes D line ..... not many sacks or pressures this season.

They've changed D lineman quite a bit. Maybe it's not the players.

 

 

The scheme is no question a good part of the blame. Weve seen tons and tons of talent on the DL over the last 2 years to till production.

Id rather see poop + jake then jake and nevis. But ideally wed have all 3 again. The best our DL has looked has been when we had all 3. 

comment_294931
3 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

We seldom make good use of the DI spots on off or def. 

The scheme is no question a good part of the blame. Weve seen tons and tons of talent on the DL over the last 2 years to till production.

Id rather see poop + jake then jake and nevis. But ideally wed have all 3 again. The best our DL has looked has been when we had all 3. 

Doug mentioned that Richard Harris got everything a player had out of his D lineman.

comment_294932
Just now, Mark F said:

Doug mentioned that Richard Harris got everything a player had out of his D lineman.

No doubt about that. Weve seen great singular efforts this year from each of the DL men. But few have consistently performed, and none have reached near their potential.  Talent isnt a problem. Getting the right guys on the field some times is, scheme certainly is. 

comment_294941
5 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Why can't you believe it? What were you expecting?

Football players, amongst other athletes far far too often fall into riding cliches into the dirt during interviews. When one is well spoken and legitimately intelligent it is a surprise.  They are among the top few percentile in terms of athletic ability, to then also be in a high percentile intelligently really puts them in rarefied air. 

Create an account or sign in to comment