Jump to content

O2L

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by O2L

  1. I think he threw that one around the rush guys. Not sure why, just have a feeling
  2. Legs dialing those convert right down the middle
  3. O2L replied to Rich's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I missed that there was a Thursday game and didn’t get that pick in, can I get that one as a loss and do the other two picks? winnipeg sask for the record, I would’ve picked Calgary and I’d hope no one would doubt that lol
  4. O2L replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Ellingson
  5. Curious where everyone is watching from? I’m in California and have been slowly converting a lot of Americans to the game (i.e. i force them to watch) but since it’s Fourth of July today everyone is busy so I’ll be flying solo.
  6. O2L replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Ellingson
  7. O2L replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Kadeem Carey
  8. O2L replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    KaDeem Carey
  9. O2L replied to Jpan85's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Stanback
  10. I thought that was Michael Bishop?
  11. Just got my tickets! Section 115!!!
  12. Yeah i was looking at the same ones on Ticketmaster! If you go that route, snag some that have three next to you and shoot me the seat numbers!
  13. Where are your seats?
  14. I’m thinking of flying in from LA for the game but I’ll probably be solo so wondering if anyone is going that I can join so I’m not sitting in hostile territory! There’s tickets in the 200s or if you happen to have an extra ticket for sale in your group that would work too!
  15. O2L replied to BBlink's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Not Nick Arrrrbuckle! GOOOO L’Ks
  16. Hmm no you must be mistaken, much like 01 and 07, I don’t believe there was a grey cup that year.
  17. O2L replied to Noeller's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Has anyone on our team been wearing a mask on the sidelines during games? That would be an indication of them being unvaxxed (like Trevor Harris was). I can’t recall any so my guess is PR guys.
  18. O2L replied to Nolby's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Because we almost exclusively handed the ball off after the Bailey touchdown to kill the clock. Our game plan was situational based on being up a touchdown. If we were down a touchdown the play calling would have reflected that (just like how when it was tied, we threw a deep ball to Bailey). Edmonton wouldn’t have scored anymore points because they didn’t when they actually needed to. They were down by a touchdown and still weren’t able to score when they absolutely needed to, so it’s fair to say that even trying their hardest to score they weren’t able to. If anything, their playcalling would have been more conservative with the lead just like ours was. Does this mean that the Bombers would have come back had they been down by seven? No, not necessarily. But they did score ten points after what may have been a Grymes pick six from fairly similar field position to where a good kick return could have gotten them, so it’s certainly not out of the question that they could have done that. These are pretty simple concepts to understand…
  19. O2L replied to Nolby's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    For L’ks sake, these rules are L’king confusing!
  20. Fixed it for you
  21. Duke to Sask. damn.
  22. O2L replied to Nolby's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    This GDT really took a weird turn
  23. O2L replied to Nolby's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Well looks like Duke will probably head to BC with Lucky out now
  24. Sadly, I was out of town for all the festivities but I watched a ton of videos. Was Collaros at the parade? I’ve seen a lot of Strev, Nichols, and McGuire.
  25. Guys, I don’t mean to defend a Rider fan here, but his response about Collaros being done etc was a direct response to someone else saying Labatte is done and citing very similar reasons as to why someone *could* say Collaros is done. He literally used the same text but replaced Labatte with Collaros to make a point. It was meant to be facetious, from what I could tell. Best to read it in context.