Jump to content

Atomic

Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by Atomic

  1. Draft picks are a 4th and a 7th in 2017. Riders get some decent assets for the future in exchange for Capiciotti who never really fit in there. There is some speculation that Fulton will retire after this season or return to Regina (he will be an FA).
  2. I can't say I'm that surprised about Copp being sent down. He had a good finish to last year and a good camp but if you send Lowry down, realistically you are going to lose him and with Copp he does not have to clear waivers so he remains with the organization. Copp would have had to be like 200% better than Lowry but it was close enough that you have to go with the smart move from an asset management perspective. I was hoping for more out of Dano. He was in tough but I can't say he even made the decision a tough one. We'll see what happens with the goalie situation. For all Pavelec's flaws, it's always nerve-wracking to put your faith in a new starting goalie. If Hellebuyck regresses badly, it would be disastrous. But I've still got high hopes. Guys that legitimately won spots are Connor and Tanev. Both could have been sent down but played well in pre-season and secured a spot. Defence is a trouble spot. I believe we have the worst depth I've seen since year one with Jets 2.0. Pardy is available, we should get him back in the fold. Seriously, he would be a great fit with the Moose and I believe would be a better call-up option than Strait and Melchiori.
  3. Projected lines (by me): Ehlers - Scheifele - Wheeler Connor - Little - Stafford Laine - Perreault - Armia Tanev - Lowry - Burmistrov Thorburn - Matthias Morrissey - Byfuglien Enstrom - Myers Stuart - Postma Chiarot Hellebuyck Hutchinson
  4. Atomic replied to wbbfan's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Lapo was certainly on his game today.
  5. To me the issue here is that the CFL does not test for recreational drugs and the only reason BJ got busted is that they have wrongly classified this drug as performance enhancing. BJ could have been doing coke all night with no issue but then he popped a pill and because the CFL has it classified as a PED he gets busted. I think that is wrong and silly. I'm sure many don't agree but it is a mistake on the part of the CFL and CFLPA.
  6. I tend to stick to things that come from the ground. Any time you start messing around with chemicals you're asking for trouble. And that includes **** like Xanax and Ritalin that get pumped into the population legally.
  7. That's from Paul Friesen. What's the world coming to when urban dictionary of all places is being used as a legitimate source?
  8. He's not just a doctor. He is an expert on football, baseball, broadcasting, filmmaking, fine art, modern education, architecture, and pretty much anything else you can Google or read on an obscure message board. Just ask him.
  9. Almost as bad as Massachusetts where an old woman was raided for one pot plant in her garden http://www.winnipegsun.com/2016/10/07/national-guard-raids-grandmothers-garden-over-a-single-marijuana-plant
  10. Yeah since when do they test for **** like that? What a joke.
  11. Wow, 2 games for a first offence. Is this normal?
  12. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    You clearly are not as intelligent as I am so I will no longer try to argue with you as my time is very valuable.
  13. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Never said they were the best. 20th seems more reasonable to me, as in they are roughly average. As for the article itself, the guy freely admits he doesn't even watch any other broadcasters. So much for impartiality! He basically just parrots what everyone else says. No one thinks for themselves anymore and you're making a great example of that, being unable to form an argument other than linking to obscure message boards and articles by nobodies.
  14. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Ah ****, the TO sun. Well when is the last time the TO sun has ever been complimentary of anyone, ever, at any time?
  15. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    K bud!
  16. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Rangers are digging themselves an impossibly deep hole here.
  17. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    LOL ok so you quote a bunch of clueless internet message board users. I can go to multiple message boards and find people who think they would make a better GM/coach than people who do it professionally but it doesn't make it remotely true. People who spend most of their days browsing the internet seem to think that reddit/twitter/etc. represent the majority when in fact it is the minority... by a wide margin.
  18. Atomic replied to nate007's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Viewers who go to fangraphs.
  19. Thanks for posting. Love that guy, couldn't agree more with him.
  20. Honestly I'd be surprised if Gurley even makes the trip to BC.
  21. I wouldn't expect that to last much longer
  22. Jamie Thomas you are a boob
  23. Atomic replied to Floyd's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Tanev-Copp-Lowry? Not gonna happen. Top 9 looks about right though.
  24. Anyone saying Hellebuyck can't be blamed for letting in five goals is just being willfully ignorant. He absolutely got hung out to dry a few times but he simply had to be better if he wants to make the team. I don't get why some people want to give young guys a pass for every mistake. The team is in the business of winning games, not coddling kids. If a player isn't yet good enough to play in the NHL night after night, then he should be in the AHL.