Everything posted by 17to85
-
Thank you Matt Nichols
Too young to remember the khari Jones era.... oh god I am old
-
2019-20 CFL Offseason
Based on last season that won't take long. Maybe he goes in to save the day in ridgeville when jesus sprinkles fails.
-
Who is the top receiver in free agency?
Jennings has more upside than pipkin cause at least jennings looked ok for one season. Christ some people and the "I've heard of him so he must be good!" Mentality... it's the CFL, we've all heard of everybody. Even the guys who suck.
-
Who is the top receiver in free agency?
Ok so do a lot of guys. Pipkin sucks balls.
-
Who is the top receiver in free agency?
What in earth for?
-
2019-20 CFL Offseason
Just ask him, he'll tell you.
-
US Politics
Yeah but joe Bidens son got a job..... BOTH SIDES!!!!!
-
Collaros signs 2 year deal
A bunch? They lose game one time for heads to roll
-
US Politics
And if they insist on Biden they'll probably do it again. The guy is clearly out of touch, and while Bernie is old as **** too at least he's got ideas that aren't just status quo. No one wants status quo. That is why clinton was rejected and trump got traction. He was an outsider, that was the appeal. People are sick of the establishment politicians and want a shake up.
-
Thank you Matt Nichols
Nichols did a hell of a lot of good for this team and he loved being a blue bomber. I for one will always look on his time here fondly
-
Collaros signs 2 year deal
Boooooooooooooooooo.
-
US Politics
Moscow Mitch is just another symptom of the republican strategy. He takes all the heat so other senators who might be vulnerable don't have to vote. Basically republicans are a stain on democracy. Real shame their poison is seeping north.
-
US Politics
Yeah but establishment democrats hate Sanders, but Biden isn't going to win reaching across the aisle.
-
US Politics
But hey, two **** heels trying to destroy each other is entertaining.
-
US Politics
You answered with a bullshit answer. You wanna carry water for this bunch you can't just hand wave away the **** you spew.
-
Collaros signs 2 year deal
It's not always raw numbers. He looked in control of the offense and showed he looked like he belonged out there.
-
US Politics
Low level coffee boy, was with the team briefly and never had much to do with anything.
-
US Politics
So if you can see that it is irrelevant why bring it up like it means anything? Why defend this so hard when the slightest bit of scrutiny makes it fall apart?
-
Collaros signs 2 year deal
No that's unfair. McGuire showed more last preseason than a lot of backups ever have. No idea if it will translate, but he showed all the tools and looked in control.
-
US Politics
That's not a legal rebuttal, it's an attempted distraction. Biden and his son have zero to do with Trump and his obstruction of congress or abuse of power. Investigating Biden isn't the issue, it's the how he went about it and as always, the cover up is worse than the crime. So really what is either biden going to bring as a witness? They are irrelevant in terms of the articles trump was impeached under. The only reason you bring up Biden is to distract from the real issue. Trump would be proud but people here aren't dumb enough to buy that crap.
-
US Politics
What the **** do the Bidens have to do with Trump obstructing congress or his abuse of power?
-
Collaros signs 2 year deal
Winning the cup made collaros untouchable here. Gotta hope Nichols lands on his feet though. The work he did to help turn this team around means a lot and always will.
-
US Politics
I know what they were, I'm trying to get the other guy to offer up what he thinks actually happened. It's sure to be a good story.
-
US Politics
Which crimes did clinton have?
-
US Politics
The report itself says if they could have exonerated the president they would have just they couldn't, aka crimes. Why they never pursued impeachment I don't know, probably because of the sham trials the senate was always going to do, but just because they didn't act on the thing doesn't mean there was nothing there. The failure to act on it is just an example of the Democrats being awful too. See that's your problem. You pick horrible examples to prove your points. Be better.