Mark H.

Huge turnover on downs at the 1

The D will be a concern until that happens.

Yes - but they give up points and yards at critical times - even when the O is decent. Yesterday, the O answered.

Just looking at the schedule, I would say any teams with a competent O will beat us - that about as optimistic as I can get: Riders: we might beat them without Harris. Should win, but might not Argos: they rely on scoring from their defense and special teams. If the Bombers can minimize that, they might have a chance. A very iffy chance B.C. No...not without changes on defense B.C. after the bye - still no Hamilton: should be a win, similar to Calgary, the O has enough firepower to cover for the D Labour Day: anybody's guess Banjo Bowl: yes

Certainly They do - I make my own and add the mustard

1. O'Shea 2. Roster Management 3. My post game 1919 HH: Jake T Hit: the mustard in my reuven

Take personal issues to PM

Back to football discussion, thank you.

If you're ever in area, try the restaraunt inside Lower Fort Gary (Life's a Little Sweeter) for breakky or lunch. Open 10 to 4 - tasty and reasonably priced.

When ZC came here in 2019, we had a smash mouth OL and one of the best ever pass pro / outlet RBs. It was literally as good as you could get it. But with a few tweaks in the interior and perhaps more use of a 6th OL, they are still serviceable and this O could still do well.

Riddle me this: At which position do you not pay more for a Canadian?

Streveller

Apples to oranges #mudatthewall

Bonfire > watch game was the correct decision

You obviously don't weigh everything on stats alone. But there are some basic stats that can be useful

Weighted mean: you calculate an average but give more weight to significant values Confidence interval: based on how far away from the average your values are

They could do that, though. Using something like a weighted mean would be pretty easy to do. They could also create confidence intervals, based on how often a team executes / allows plays > 30 yards

"Only those who do not wear a seatbelt, get hurt." The final quote in article does not compute...there was literally stuff falling on people.

Where did I say they weren't? Fajardo has been a good QB in Montreal, he wasn't that good previously.

Could be, but sometimes you work with the QB you have - like the Als with Fajardo.

Not sure which game you're watching?

That was the achilles heel of the offenses quarterbacked by Nichols and Glenn. Opposing defenses did not need to respect the deep ball as a consistent threat. He's having nightmares of how to keep the centre off his butt.

Ok. Then we agree...that it's possible for the Jets to be more competitive.

I was doing the same. Their interior OL had his number all night. He got to plays after the fact, only because they had disengaged.

Ticket sales will then remain middling as well.