Rich

If Kane would have been a professional and not worn the track suit, it wouldn't have happened. Act like an entitled child, get treated as one.

Is it me or is this an odd tweet from Pascucci?

Kunitz would probably have to be a part of that deal to offset salary for the Pens.

It is interesting how some of the discussions in the media have been how Kane may have a chance to succeed on another team with different leadership to “guide” him. Of course I will never know what goes on in the dressing room, and what the other players have done with Kane up to this point. But I can’t think this is the first isolated incident. Nor do I think that this is the worst of things that could happen to you in a dressing room. For Kane to skip out on a game because of this is ridiculous. I’d be very surprised if he plays another game with the Jets. How do you walk back into that dressing room after doing that? Talk about an awkward flight home

I think everyone is very curious to know the whole story. If it ever comes out though, I probably won't be until after he is traded.

There comes a point where you need to cut your losses. And lets be honest, his stock hasn't been rising here over the last few years. It has been on a steady decline. If you don't think things will get better, you need to get what you can. And yes, it may mean he flourishes with another team (see Tyler Seguin). But that doesn't mean he would flourish with yours had you kept him.

Wouldn't they be able to call up another forward if Kane is put on the IR?

If Kane is going to be traded, I can't see it happening until the off season. And if he announces he is going in for surgery today and will be out the rest of the season, good chance we've seen Kane play his last game in a Jets uniform.

The problem with saying things like this is that there is very little chance of Wheeler and Little ever doing something like this. Nor do they have the history that Kane does.

Nobody that I can think of that would make me trade Kane.

Kane being traded to Ottawa or New Jersey?

He was released a few months before his contract ended so he could sign in the NFL. Similar to what we did for Ian Wild this year.

For a lot of reasons, I don’t usually publically post or discuss site discipline. Wide Right has now been banned. This morning he used an IP address that was common to one that only Migs has used in the past. Of course this is never 100% proof that it is the same poster, it could mean that they simply work at the same company. But the other evidence that was posted made it compelling enough to ban him. And by posting this, he will know not to post from that IP address again in the future (one of the reasons I don’t usually disclose this stuff). As a rule, I don’t like to ban people. In the history of this site, there have been 4 people banned. 3 if you count Migs and Wide Right as one. Not something we do lightly. And being a Rider fan is not reason enough to ban people. But with Migs, he keeps coming back because there are a group of posters who fall for his schtick every time. He wants to derail threads, he wants to post silly arguments to get the replies from you. You will never win an argument with him, you will never get him to see the light, as he obviously has no interest in that. So when he does return the next time, the best thing you can really do is ignore him, and don’t give him what he wants. And seriously, “letting you at him”, will have no effect on him what so ever. Words can’t hurt people or put them in the hospital. Letting you at him is exactly what he wants and why he comes here.

Migs is gone from the site. No need to trash the guy when he isn't even around to defend himself. Posts have been deleted. Sometimes it is best to just take the high road. Please try to keep it classy.

He never really got a shot at receiver all year. Super bowl was really the first game they played him on offence. Got to think going into next year he will be given the opportunity to start next year, and if he shows well, he will be able to parlay that into a big pay cheque.

After two losses Jets need to win this game. Hutch gives them the best chance.

I will give him credit, he is a very good interviewer. Does his research and his interviews are typically very well done. But it is all that in between stuff that makes me literally yell at the radio until I need to change the station. Can't stand his call in segments either.

For anyone who has listened to Rome at least a half a dozen times, read this in his voice, and his intonations, and tell me I’m wrong.

I do believe that pretty much anyone can sign up and edit Wikipedia. It sometimes goes through an approval process if you are new or not known. That is the whole point of Wikipedia, is it is kept up to date by the community at large.

I have 1290 (sports radio) on most of the time when in the car, but I will only listen to the local content. The morning show on the drive in to work, Hustler & Lawless on the drive home. Some of their Saturday content isn’t bad either, either a recap of the week’s programming (hear stuff you missed) or the Illegal Curve guys who bring an interesting perspective to their shows. Yes, they are self-important media types, and can get caught up in some pretty silly things at times, but the content is primarily targeted to the Jets and Bombers. And that makes it interesting for me. I find their guests to usually be more informative then the hosts. Being part of TSN gives them access to a lot of the high profile analysts. Lawless is also fairly well-connected and can get some big names onto his show. I also like Shane Hnidy, being a former player, he always brings an interesting perspective to what is going on. For the Bombers, other than Bob Irving doing the play-by-play, I find TSN 1290’s pre and post-game shows better than CJOB (WAY too many commercials on CJOB, but it has been that way for years). As soon as the coach’s interview is done on CJOB, I switch back to TSN. Walby, Westwood, and Bauming (I believe), do a pretty good job. I have no patience for the syndicated shows like Jim Rome, or anything out of Toronto.

It isn't twisting words around when you are using this as an argument to support the statement that Bowman and TN are guilty or backroom deals and corruption if the deal happens ... with no other proof than conjecture and circumstance and “connecting the dots”. Or if you prefer, what you are really saying, is that corruption happens frequently or often in government and since there seems to be an illusion of backroom deals here, if this deal is signed, they are guilty. I really don’t know if there is corruption going on here one way or the other (I won't say there is 100% no corruption just as I won't say that there is), but I don’t think it is right to proclaim someone as guilty without fact or proof. Gut feeling doesn’t really cut it. If someone thinks something fishy is going on here, then investigate and find proof.

] You're accusing two people of criminal behavior in this thread. He's taking a break from accusing people of doping. Yes, I guess no athletes dope and politicians are always honest. Amazing how some of you guys are living in a fantasy world. Only problem is that Mark Chipman publicly endorsed Brian Bowman for mayor. My instincts tell me that Chipman expected something in return for that endorsement and that mayor Bowman will cave and allow TNSE to develop the land. I suspect Mr Bowman and Mr Chipman have spoken several times over the past couple weeks on this matter. We will see what kind of backbone our mayor has this week. RFP and he's got a backbone (although TNSE could still win the bid through the RFP), or council decides to give the contract directly to TNSE means Bowman is paying back a favour to Chipman. Will be interesting...Absolutely nonsense. This is the "dirty" aspect of politics. Someone endorses a politician and must be expecting a favour? Give me a break. There is absolutely nothing to indicate Chipman traded his endorsement for a favour. What it seems like is CV has a deal for a hotel project there. SOD claims they have a deal too. Let them both submit bids and let council pick one. Done and done. Supposedly SOD was having trouble finding a hotel partner and let CV know that. If CV turned around and did their own search and made a deal with TN and then SOD said hey wait we think we have a partner now, I can understand if CV was reluctant to throw away their work. Especially if SOd's partner isn't local like TN Not that I am defending CV at all. They got way too far away from their original mandate. Bowman will clean it up. If anything bowman will be tougher on Chipman to dissuade anyone from accusing him of a conflict. I see nothing that indicates bowman is Sammy. You are being very naive here. Election support from business in exchange for political favors happens ALL the time. But I sure hope you're right about Bowman treating Chipman tougher. Sure seems like that is what you've been implying.