-
-
-
-
Congratulations Bombers
You're absolutely right. I know where I am... all I was saying was maybe this wasnt the right forum to start up that discussion. There was a lot of humble pie being eaten and some sincere congratulations posted here... but you're right, your territory, your rules. Congrats again. Good luck in the WF!
-
Congratulations Bombers
Did you read my earlier post on this very thread... the one where I congratulated everyone here without a single excuse? And while there are no doubt angry fans on RF... there is an entire thread there congratulating the Bombers on their win.
-
Congratulations Bombers
I fail to see the need for this in this thread. We have come here and humbly congratulated Bomber fans on the win. Its actually been quite civil. Yet you feel the need to stir things up... craving attention? Things must be pretty quiet over in the Eastside.
-
-
-
Congratulations Bombers
I don't understand. You want my name and number? Lol... err... not sure I'm ready for that yet... maybe buy me a drink first!
-
-
-
Congratulations Bombers
Congratulations on the win. No excuses here... (other than dumping hot wing sauce on my jersey before the game and the local beer store was out of Pilsner.. All signs we pointing to something bad before kickoff lol) I think we had a chance to win the game but Winnipeg made the bigger plays and we didn't. That was the difference. Again, congratulations, Good luck in the WSF. Should be a hard hitter.
-
-
-
-
For those traveling to Regina this weekend!
Drive safe. Hopefully the road conditions are good this weekend.
-
Next Up At Ottawa
And yet here you are, taking the time to upload your little picture you've been saving. Sounds like you care.
-
Next Up At Ottawa
While I'll be cheering for the RedBlacks, I also think the Bombers win this one. Nichols seems to be playing with more confidence and your D is looking better as well. That... and Ottawa is due for a loss. (But Go Ottawa) 😝
-
Around the League: 2018 Season
Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend?
-
Around the League: 2018 Season
Well, this is what is written... Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. ...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day.
-
Around the League: 2018 Season
Yes, maximum 44 players, with 3 of them who shall be identified as quarterbacks I can read the rules just fine.
-
Around the League: 2018 Season
It says 3 players "shall be identified as quarterbacks". Who's having trouble with English?
-
Around the League: 2018 Season
I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio. Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players.
-
Stampeders @ Tiger Cats
I think your winning streak comes to an end today. As much as I would like to see Calgary stumble again, I just can't see it happening.
-
LDC/Banjo Bowl
That was actually pretty funny...