Jump to content

Wanna-B-Fanboy

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wanna-B-Fanboy

  1. Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Goalie's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Amazing Eulogy- do yourself a fav and give it a listen.
  2. Me, after mis-reading the above.
  3. "They are just bouncing ideas off one another- it's what all brilliant football minds do."- Rod Peterson "No, Rod. Those are stones and coffee mugs, not ideas."- casual observer
  4. Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's post in a topic in General Discussion
    John Oliver Knocks Oprah off as Queen of daytime TV with $15 Million dollar give away. http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/06/technology/john-oliver-medical-debt/index.html
  5. Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Goalie's post in a topic in General Discussion
    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/jun/04/muhammad-ali-obituary
  6. Uhm, nope. John Murphy is a Butterface and Jones doesn't seem like the type to respect you in the morning. But hey, if you want to- I am not gonna judge.
  7. ? ? For the funny in your post. For using the word "barista" & ordering a Latte.
  8. Saskatchewan is going to be competitive this year. Riderfans are a Classy bunch with no amount of inbred congenital defects.
  9. I don't understand why you are posting a specific reply (re: cherry pick) from a notorious troll on www.skepticalscience.com. You are being silly. Seriously, it's all here: https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php?p=10&t=1168&&a=18#3421 I mean Gord even gets schooled by another poster, Patrick 027- why would you even post the above when it was pretty much dismissed/disproven on the next page? Anyways, not sure why you are so anti-science.
  10. Yup- that is the beauty of science... if new material comes to light that dispels a theory- it's trashed and you start again. Science states what holds to be true at that moment. What you are suggesting is basing truth on the fact science "might" be wrong in the future, despite what the evidence shows us at this moment- that is insane.
  11. Yeeeeeeaah... I am going to go with the consensus of the scientific community on this one (Before you scream "NOT 100%!!!"), not some special interest undermine outfit like climate depot, as and extension of CFACT, funded by donors trust with notable money men like Koch family and so on... Cherry picking data at it's best. Seriously- what is with the anti-science crowd? How can you be against evidence based decision making?
  12. I thought it was hot- but not this hot. http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/16/world/climate-change-april-hottest-month/index.html http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/temperature-monthly-records-1.3584249
  13. When he does a fan meet up. In his new digs.
  14. Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Blueballz's post in a topic in General Discussion
    Interesting Article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-republican-party-implosion-1.3564282
  15. Solution is simple: TPB or KAT
  16. Funny, the above is applicable to some one commenting on your posts.
  17. Good god... we just got rid of harper now we have to deal with 4 years of premier Lurch... It's going to be a fun train wreck to watch
  18. http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/19/opinions/sutter-carbon-tax-washington-british-columbia/index.html Interesting article. Solid and elegant argument. "We should make bad stuff more expensive. And, by doing that, make good stuff cheaper."
  19. Fixed for accuracy
  20. You obviously haven't been to the Blue Bomber Discussion part of these forums...