Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 2019-08-10 in all areas

  1. Plop vs Nichols

    AKAChip and 6 others reacted to JuranBoldenRules for a post in a topic

    7 points
    We're saying the same thing. In the interest of being 1-0 next week we need better offense.
  2. It’s strictly situational. There are other situations where they took out Mathews and put Miller in. Other times they took out Couture and put Remple in. It doesn’t mean Remple should start at centre, it just means he has special skills as a long snapper. In the last minute of the game, with the lead, you want to run the ball to keep the clock running. Strevs is a better runner than Matt, so the coaches made the right decision that proved successful. I think it is folly to extrapolate situational decision to mean anything else.
  3. Plop vs Nichols

    Wideleft and 6 others reacted to NorthernSkunk for a post in a topic

    7 points
    This seems to be an odd poll for a team that is currently 6-2 and first in their division. I will not be voting.
  4. Jerks vs. Larks

    Mark F and 4 others reacted to 17to85 for a post in a topic

    5 points
  5. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    Sard and 3 others reacted to blue_gold_84 for a post in a topic

    4 points
    You can't honestly believe the QB alone is the one and only player holding back this team... That's simply a ridiculous and ignorant comment to make. Watching eight games of this regular season would easily demonstrate that what ails this team goes beyond who's behind centre. I get it: the offense the last three games has been nauseating to watch - and Nichols' play has been a significant part of that. But it's not just on him. Unless you expect a QB to play DB and defend/pick off a pass, play LB and not whiff on a tackle, play tailback and not fumble, play receiver and hold on to a catchable pass, play returner and not fumble twice in a game... On Thursday, special teams basically won that game for the home team. Rose's late INT helped seal the deal. This notion the 2019 Blue Bombers live and die based on the play of a single player is patently false and very irrational. Other players have made mistakes this past season, on offense, on defense, and on special teams. Hell, the coaching staff continues to make mistakes, too. There's ample blame to go around and fall at the feet of many. A truly, consistently dominant team is one that limits its mistakes - across the board. That has yet to happen with this team. Even at 6-2, there is so much room for improvement here. And that starts with the coaches and trickles down the roster in all three phases of this team.
  6. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    rebusrankin and 3 others reacted to AKAChip for a post in a topic

    4 points
    Hey Glen, Davis is older than Bo Levi Mitchell. Maybe it’s about time you stop calling him a “young” quarterback.
  7. Plop vs Nichols

    B140 and 3 others reacted to B-F-F-C for a post in a topic

    4 points
    Where the “neither” option?
  8. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    Albertabomberguy and 3 others reacted to rebusrankin for a post in a topic

    4 points
    On the fans, its has been 29 years since we've won the Cup. In that time, we've had some very good teams and some awful teams. We've had our hearts broken many times (1993, 1994, 2001, 2007....). Rightly or wrongly, it makes many of us pessimistic because we've seen it all go wrong many times before. Am I happy that we're in first? Of course. Do I feel we have a real shot at the Grey Cup? Yes, I do. However that doesn't mean that Lapo's playcalling or Nichols lacklustre play the past few games doesn't concern me because it does. The bottom line is we're all hardcore fans of the team (you have to be to be a message board regular) and the taking shots at others who disagree with you or express an opinion you don't like is not only childish and petty, frankly its bullshit.
  9. Plop vs Nichols

    Noeller and 2 others reacted to Floyd for a post in a topic

    3 points
    A bit skeptical that the OC and QB of a 6-2 team are about to be canned...
  10. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    Mark H. and 2 others reacted to BBRT for a post in a topic

    3 points
    I agree with what you are saying. My major grievance is that despite our record with is great I have great concerns as it relates to our ability to not only win the Cup but just to get there. I do not believe that we will be able to get their unless we can prove we can thrown downfield and stretch the defense. Failing to do that IMHO will doom us when it counts. I also do not believe we will achieve what we all are wanting ( A Grey Cup Victory) with our current QB. This is solely my opinion and I do not expect everyone to agree with it. And as one of my old bosses use to say "Exception Noted".
  11. Plop vs Nichols

    comedygeek and 2 others reacted to Eternal optimist for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Well, actually OTT is tied with us for 2-and-outs. Although our 2-and-outs (44) are above league average (35.6), we also still lead the league in the following offensive categories, despite the bad road trip to Ontario: - Offensive touchdowns (23) - Overall touchdowns (25) - Passing touchdowns (15) - Rushing yards (982) - This is particularly good, considering how much more frequently SSK attempts to run the ball (SSK has 187 rush attempts, we have only 151 but still manage to lead the league in rushing yards). We are also 2nd only to EDM in passing efficiency (EDM - 104.5, WPG 102.6) I'd be more concerned with the high number of two-and-outs if we didn't maintain the ball offensively for so long, the two other teams with more two-and-outs (OTT, TOR) are also dead last in average time of possession (25:38 and 26:46), whereas the bombers (32:34) are much closer to the top average (MTL - 33:16). This is indicative of OTT and TOR having to change their strategy to more pass-happy because they play from behind more often. This in turn is riskier, and thus results in more two-and-outs. Changing your starting QB or offensive coordinator when you're 6-2 is nothing short of ridiculous.
  12. Plop vs Nichols

    TBURGESS and 2 others reacted to Blueandgold for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Sure, we could've said the same thing about the 7-1 2011 Bombers as well. What happened to that team when the turnovers started to dry up? You can't rely on returning kicks for touchdowns to win and the offense has to be able to score the ball.
  13. Plop vs Nichols

    66 Chevelle and 2 others reacted to Goalie for a post in a topic

    3 points
    6 and 2 yup. If Nichols could close a game it would be 7 1. 6 and 2 is great but u got 3 teams now at 5 and 3 also. 7 and 1 gives you cushioning. 6 2 and a loss next week means likely tied for 1st. The QB play is inconsistent. It needs to improve. Our o has talent, our QB needs to be better. 6 and 2 yup but with average quarterbacking not ridiculous fancy stats like passer rating... 8 and 0. Both games we lost because our QB sucked.
  14. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    Tracker and 2 others reacted to JCon for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Jones is pretty unlikeable too. Maas at least does it in the heat of the moment. Jones plotted out being a jerk.
  15. Jerks vs. Larks

    Bigblue204 and 2 others reacted to JuranBoldenRules for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Time limit seems too short. Think it should just be if they can't play by midnight local it's called, provided the team with the lead is up by 17+. Otherwise they need to figure out how to resume the game the next day. Most stadiums would not be booked.
  16. Plop vs Nichols

    blue_gold_84 and 2 others reacted to Noeller for a post in a topic

    3 points
    the first 5 games of this season he was leading the league in virtually every statistical category, including QB efficiency and TD:INT ratio.....
  17. Plop vs Nichols

    B-F-F-C and 2 others reacted to Fatty Liver for a post in a topic

    3 points
    You need to look at the strategy LaPo employs, Nichols throws the check down because it's a given gain, the objective is to avoid the 2nd and 10 situations which often lead to two and outs, stalling drives short of Medlock's range. They can't run Harris on every down, so better to pick up 5 yds. on 1st down than taking the greater risk of throwing an incomplete pass and facing 2nd and 10 with the D anticipating the 10 yd. pass. If the primary receiver is open great, but it's not always the case. Give credit where it's due, it may be a boring conservative strategy but it does move the ball effectively and consistently which produces a majority of wins, even if some fans don't like it. I don't think Nichols gives a rat's ass about his stats. and LaPo is not in the entertainment business, he prefers to count body blows which wear down the opponent rather than throwing hay-makers attempting to knock them out cold.
  18. Jerks vs. Larks

    Eternal optimist and 2 others reacted to blueandgoldguy for a post in a topic

    3 points
    This reeks of TSN's influence. The longer they have to wait it out the higher the production costs for tv and they don't want their crew waiting longer than they need to. Plus they would be splitting their CFL audience in two with 2 games occurring simultaneously for an hour or so. There is a desperate need for competition for tv rights when the contract is up in 2 years.
  19. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    TBURGESS and 2 others reacted to Brandon for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Why do teams on 3rd and short go in Shotgun format for the hand off.... I'd love to see the success rate because it seems like it rarely works compared to the normal big formation up the gut.
  20. Jerks vs. Larks

    The Classic and 2 others reacted to Ripper for a post in a topic

    3 points
    As they should be. No one is happy about this
  21. Jerks vs. Larks

    The Classic and 2 others reacted to JCon for a post in a topic

    3 points
    They are at every turn.
  22. Jerks vs. Larks

    The Classic and 2 others reacted to SpeedFlex27 for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Media & fan reaction is what I'm talking about. I'm sure the CFL is getting roasted on social media.
  23. Plop vs Nichols

    The Classic and 2 others reacted to SpeedFlex27 for a post in a topic

    3 points
    Do your democratic duty & vote.
  24. Someone on my twitter feed said Nichols should sign his paycheck over to Grant this week. I LOL'd.
  25. and, just for the record, I'm not absolving Nichols of anything or saying he's the second coming of Tom Brady, but Jesus.....some of you are so far out too lunch and just CONSUMED by negativity. I've seen enough 3-15's to last a lifetime.....I'm gonna enjoy 6-2, thanks.
  26. Jerks vs. Larks

    Tracker and one other reacted to johnzo for a post in a topic

    2 points
    I wish Chris Jones were still in Saskatchewan so I could call the thread Good Jones vs. Evil Jones. man that hit on Pipkin ...that looked harder than the Buck Pierce shot in 2011...
  27. Jerks vs. Larks

    CodyT and one other reacted to 17to85 for a post in a topic

    2 points
    It's just a complete embarrassment that a league that prides itself on exciting finishes ends a game after 3 quarters. It is a complete rip off.
  28. Jerks vs. Larks

    NorthernSkunk and one other reacted to do or die for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Ironic, after all that "the Bombers are lucky" talk.
  29. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    TBURGESS and one other reacted to wbbfan for a post in a topic

    2 points
    I was thinking about that today. Maybe the hall defense and plop offense is just how the game in CFL is gonna be played under this set of rules and enforcement. Not a thought I relish. I feel like the core of the old west coast style of offense is gone and the maligned bones remain.
  30. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    Tracker and one other reacted to MrFreakzilla for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Also the sun goes up and the sun goes down. 3 things that won't be changing in our lifetime.
  31. Jerks vs. Larks

    NorthernSkunk and one other reacted to Steve Fanitage for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Really? Because in the thread on Rider Fans there is post after post of people who are feeling pretty good about it. Some even delusionally believe the Riders have been so hard done by in the past they were somehow owed this. It's actually pretty pathetic.
  32. Redblacks @ Eskimos

    Tracker and one other reacted to Brandon for a post in a topic

    2 points
    I'm not a huge Harris fan at all (flakey when times get tough, not good in cold weather, apparently a bad team mate) but unquestionable he's a better qb then Nichols is. He is able to go through more then one read and able to throw the ball down the field. Nichols in the last 3 weeks has been better then who ? Pipkin and Jennings... hardly anything to brag about. Fajardo is even better which is sad.
  33. Jerks vs. Larks

    WildPath and one other reacted to Mark F for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Bad rule and a bad way to treat Montreal fans just when the team is giving them a reason to come to games. really do not like this rule change to solve a non existent problem .
  34. Jerks vs. Larks

    Mark F and one other reacted to M.O.A.B. for a post in a topic

    2 points
    should have been ruled out a draw
  35. Jerks vs. Larks

    Eternal optimist and one other reacted to Ripper for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Not going to get into this too much right now. BUT no one here is happy about this, I want to play the game. If we lose we lose. This is bullshit. This league is going to **** in a hurry. How am I supposed to enjoy this as a fan. We won, kinda….. #nothappy
  36. Jerks vs. Larks

    B-F-F-C and one other reacted to bustamente for a post in a topic

    2 points
    If I'm the Als I'm pissed, only 7 points down and playing without a CFL quality qb.
  37. Jerks vs. Larks

    rebusrankin and one other reacted to 17to85 for a post in a topic

    2 points
    what a crock of ****. Every team should get to count a 3 quarter game. we are now 7-1.
  38. Jerks vs. Larks

    SpeedFlex27 and one other reacted to MrFreakzilla for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Hair is overrated
  39. Jerks vs. Larks

    WildPath and one other reacted to rebusrankin for a post in a topic

    2 points
    This new rule is stupid.
  40. Jerks vs. Larks

    SpeedFlex27 and one other reacted to bustamente for a post in a topic

    2 points
    "Otto" pilot
  41. Jerks vs. Larks

    Tracker and one other reacted to SpeedFlex27 for a post in a topic

    2 points
    This guy.
  42. He probably cried himself to sleep
  43. 2 points
    That's right.
  44. Plop vs Nichols

    blue_gold_84 and one other reacted to Rod Black for a post in a topic

    2 points
    A neither option would be sensible, and less divisive.
  45. Well he never turned ball over...got us in position to kick 2 field goals...another where we failed on 3rd and short...and put up 33 some odd minutes of time of possesion...effectively keping Cgy off the score board...there is that aspect that can't be understated Maybe it's football gods shining down on him for many many many games in 2016 and 2017 where he put up over 30 points as the QB and we lost because our defense couldn't stop a JUCO offence consistently
  46. I honestly don't want to wade into this big pissing contest, but here's one thing I know: I've seen a lot worse teams with a lot worse QBing than we have, win the GC. I'm not saying "we're gonna win!" but I'm saying "we're good enough, and Nichols is good enough to win".....it doesn't have to be pretty to get the job done.
  47. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    blue_gold_84 and one other reacted to Rod Black for a post in a topic

    2 points
    I’m wondering to myself - if the Bombers are in first place, won more games than any other team, but there is such pointed anger to not playing the way a fan envisions, is it the Bombers fault? If it’s so hard to like and appreciate the current standings, why not pick a team that suits a fans expectations better....
  48. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    blue_gold_84 and one other reacted to Rich for a post in a topic

    2 points
    You have to be crazy to think that “desire” is what sets Calgary apart from the rest of the league. What kind of crap to you keep spewing around here Every other team goes into the office every day thinking what can we do to just be good enough. If this is how you really feel people think, I feel sorry for you and the organizations you’ve worked for. Everyone doesn’t make the correct decisions or executions, but I can assure you desire is not lacking in this organization.
  49. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    blue_gold_84 and one other reacted to rebusrankin for a post in a topic

    2 points
    Did anybody check to see if Dickenson is ok after being done in by those Fing Canadians?
  50. GDT-Stumps @ Bombers

    BigBlueFanatic and one other reacted to M.O.A.B. for a post in a topic

    2 points
    At this rate Rose will be our MODP. 6 Ints in 8 games played... a very very nice FA pickup.