Let's assume our team is healthy who in your opinion is the worst starting player on our roster?

Looking at last weeks depth chart, I'd go with J-Homo or JFG.  I'm no longer a fan of Bryant Turner, but I wouldn't put him in that category yet. 

Looking at last weeks depth chart, I'd go with J-Homo or JFG.  I'm no longer a fan of Bryant Turner, but I wouldn't put him in that category yet. 

 

 

Let's assume our team is healthy who in your opinion is the worst starting player on our roster?

If our team is entirely healthy, the answer has to be Patrick Neufeld or Dominic Picard.

I would have to say Picard, unfortunately.

All I know is, it's not Bucknor...not even close....

Hurl is pretty bad right?

Hurl is pretty bad right?

Coming along nicely...made great progress the last couple weeks, especially.

Bucknor and it's not even a question in my mind, only places I'd put as contenders are Picard and which ever of Greaves or Neufeld you'd call the starter now. 

All I know is, it's not Bucknor...not even close....

 

I say this and I truly do like Bucknor but.. It's pretty close. Especially if you're looking for weak links on the defensive side of the ball. 

 

All I know is, it's not Bucknor...not even close....

 

I say this and I truly do like Bucknor but.. It's pretty close. Especially if you're looking for weak links on the defensive side of the ball. 

 

He doesn't draw the ire of fans like the OL or Hurl do because they are much more front and centre and Bucknor is tucked away on the corner to hide him, but he's the guy teams always pick on after a turnover. I could live with him if we were using the ratio flexibility to bolster other positions, but we're not. 

bucknor but honorable mentions to picard (worst bang for buck on roster by far) and greaves (worst regresssion this season)

Picard

Let's assume our team is healthy who in your opinion is the worst starting player on our roster?

 

 

Well, assuming our guys are healthy, bigger, stronger, faster and younger, I see no problems with our starting lineup.

 

Let's assume our team is healthy who in your opinion is the worst starting player on our roster?

 

 

Well, assuming our guys are healthy, bigger, stronger, faster and younger, I see no problems with our starting lineup.

 

Which is a really good point, too. I said to Dave "If Bucknor's our worst starter, then we have a really good ******* team"

Bryant Turner, Stoudemire (if that counts), Greaves. 

 

Second tier of sucky: Anderson, Peach

I'm going to challenge MOS on something he said on the Coach's show. He said the centre's snaps were fine. That's not the worst complaint I have with Picard, but it's a start. Picard himself, hasn't surprised me, because I didn't want him signed, but, I was hoping his veteran knowledge and nastiness, would carry him more than just calling out blocks. It hasn't. And I've seen better blocking in a hat.

The expectations of the position and the resulting failure to meet them, makes Picard my vote for Picard a snap.

 

 

All I know is, it's not Bucknor...not even close....

 

I say this and I truly do like Bucknor but.. It's pretty close. Especially if you're looking for weak links on the defensive side of the ball. 

 

He doesn't draw the ire of fans like the OL or Hurl do because they are much more front and centre and Bucknor is tucked away on the corner to hide him, but he's the guy teams always pick on after a turnover. I could live with him if we were using the ratio flexibility to bolster other positions, but we're not. 

 

He does get picked on but in his defense he holds his ground. He's extremely athletic and is a good tackler. Only problem is he still gets burned too much.

 

 

 

All I know is, it's not Bucknor...not even close....

 

I say this and I truly do like Bucknor but.. It's pretty close. Especially if you're looking for weak links on the defensive side of the ball. 

 

He doesn't draw the ire of fans like the OL or Hurl do because they are much more front and centre and Bucknor is tucked away on the corner to hide him, but he's the guy teams always pick on after a turnover. I could live with him if we were using the ratio flexibility to bolster other positions, but we're not. 

 

He does get picked on but in his defense he holds his ground. He's extremely athletic and is a good tackler. Only problem is he still gets burned too much.

 

But the issue with that is you don't really know if he's getting burned, or if someone else is, and he's covering for them......without knowing the schemes and all that, you just don't really know who's at fault....

Surprised I'm the only person yet to mention JFG.

Surprised I'm the only person yet to mention JFG.

I'm a pretty big JFG fan, but when Dave first brought up this ridiculous idea on FB, my response was "JFG"...

Surprised I'm the only person yet to mention JFG.

I'm a pretty big JFG fan, but when Dave first brought up this ridiculous idea on FB, my response was "JFG"...

I like JFG too, but he's not a starter.

Picard and Neufeld would be a pick' em.  And they'd be in the 'lead' by a wide-margin.

good thread

 

 

I don't rewatch games, for me, it's pretty hard to understand what happened just watching live. together with lack of actual knowledge, means….

 

I don't know the answer. 

 

I will say that I am most disappointed in JFG, don't know if its how he's playing, or how he's used. I was hoping he'd have a good year, and has not turned out that way.

 

also, I am disappointed in the blocking by receivers, I don't see any at all ever. not a single player, but a unit. 

 

edit:

 

I say Picard or Neufeld tied

JFG looks like a 5th receiver to me.  On pace for about 350 yards.