July 31, 201311 yr comment_11637 Ha, ha Justin Case. I got that one. Clever. I know I'm a comedic genius.
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11644 I know I'm a comedic genius. if even Iso gets your jokes then you are a genius.
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11662 Ohhhh Buck's mysterious injury. It'll be interesting to see him magically get healthy in the middle of the game if our other QBs go down.
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11667 Ohhhh Buck's mysterious injury. It'll be interesting to see him magically get healthy in the middle of the game if our other QBs go down. Well he dressed last game, so I'm not really too sure if that were to happen, if it would be magical.
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11668 .... my point is that he is not truly injured and they don't have the balls to just say he's being sat down.
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11682 .... my point is that he is not truly injured and they don't have the balls to just say he's being sat down. But the only problem was keeping him healthy...they win when he plays...no...wait...
July 31, 201311 yr comment_11683 You think they would start Max Hall over a healthy Buck Pierce? Come on....
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11700 Ohhhh Buck's mysterious injury. It'll be interesting to see him magically get healthy in the middle of the game if our other QBs go down. Like if Mitchell and Tate had gone down last game and Glenn would have had to come in?
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11704 The word is.....Buck got a big hit on his Testicles and could play on monday.
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11725 Like if Mitchell and Tate had gone down last game and Glenn would have had to come in? Glenn never was announced the starter, nor is he the guy that they have stated they'll live and die by. So no... I wouldn't say like that.
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11827 Like if Mitchell and Tate had gone down last game and Glenn would have had to come in? Brad Sinapoli would've come in before Glenn.
August 1, 201311 yr Author comment_11833 .... my point is that he is not truly injured and they don't have the balls to just say he's being sat down. Or do they
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11844 You think they would start Max Hall over a healthy Buck Pierce? Come on.... Well, I guess we know the answer to that now.
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11877 Well, I guess we know the answer to that now. the thing that really got me was how in the clip of burke talking about moving on from pierce he talked about needing the continuity of having the same guy behind centre week to week and how the young guys have more potential to get better.... Why the **** didn't he see that prior to now? Some of us were saying those exact same things before last season ended. Frustrates me when fans pick up on obvious things before the coaches do.
August 1, 201311 yr comment_11998 the thing that really got me was how in the clip of burke talking about moving on from pierce he talked about needing the continuity of having the same guy behind centre week to week and how the young guys have more potential to get better.... Why the **** didn't he see that prior to now? Some of us were saying those exact same things before last season ended. Frustrates me when fans pick up on obvious things before the coaches do. People were saying this 2 seasons ago.... I guess Burke needed 2 years of game footage to come up with the same answer that a casual fan could come up with....
August 2, 201311 yr comment_12020 Boggles the mind. Think they played dice before they made the decision? Rollin', rollin.' rollin'.
August 2, 201311 yr comment_12023 Glenn never was announced the starter, nor is he the guy that they have stated they'll live and die by. So no... I wouldn't say like that. What does that have to do with it. The suggestion was that Buck wasn't really hurt because he was dressed for the game. Tate and Glenn were both said to be injured yet they both dressed as well.
August 2, 201311 yr comment_12024 ... Both of those would start if they WERE in fact healthy. My point is that Pierce was healthy and they were using an "injury" as an excuse. Completely different situations. Not sure how else to explain it. ETA I think Mitchell may now back up Tate in more than just short yardage now.
August 2, 201311 yr comment_12027 ... Both of those would start if they WERE in fact healthy. My point is that Pierce was healthy and they were using an "injury" as an excuse. Completely different situations. Not sure how else to explain it. Except Pierce was NOT healthy. The doctors said he wasn't able to go. What Pierce said was irrelevant because he could be on the turf looking like the Black Knight from Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail and still say he was healthy enough to play.
August 2, 201311 yr comment_12041 Except Pierce was NOT healthy. The doctors said he wasn't able to go. What Pierce said was irrelevant because he could be on the turf looking like the Black Knight from Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail and still say he was healthy enough to play. Suuuuuure he was . Just like the day before they announced Goltz was the starter he was still "... injured"..
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment