August 3, 201311 yr comment_12211 Don't like the logo above the name plate either (even on my current jersey) .. looks like a cheap after thought. Better than where the Riders decided to put theirs.
August 3, 201311 yr comment_12306 So, I have a 70's Dieter Brock jersey. Is the third jersey too close a representation to the 70's to buy the new third one? The 70's jersey looks a lot better than the current ones the team wears now IMO. What do you guys think?
August 3, 201311 yr comment_12312 iso, I'm in the same boat, I've got a handsome #97 Brown 70s throwback that looks great and starts conversations on the streets here in Seattle ... and 200 bones is a lot of money to spend on yet another sports jersey ... but I was a HUGE fan of every one of the players in the photo that WBB Fan Girl linked to so I'm definitely tempted to spend the money on a #35 Jones or a #63 Walby. Like a lot of posters here, I think both the 70s and 80s throwbacks look way better than the current jersey. That royal blue looks so sharp and distinctive; the navy blue is boring and generic.
August 3, 201311 yr comment_12325 You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.
August 3, 201311 yr comment_12335 You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.
August 5, 201311 yr comment_12520 The fact that BlueBall (and others) will pay whatever for the jersey is probably why they're priced where they are. I think it's branding driving the price there, moreso than material & labor cost. Livin' the high life, that's how I roll.
_4ce1be.png)
_4ccb55.png)
_b2ed7a.png)
Create an account or sign in to comment