Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 160
  • Views 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • voodoochylde
    voodoochylde

  • There was space between foot and sideline when he placed his foot...that was clear and undisputeable...when he cut to the inside..it looked like the green had disappeared and possibly his foot touched

  • rebusrankin
    rebusrankin

    Alexander wasn't out, I mean on the replay he's mm away but there was still green between his foot and the out of bounds line.

comment_717182
8 minutes ago, Booch said:

That play was a classic example of a call made on the field...not having evidence to change it...hopefully moving forward they can maintain this...he definitely was inbounds...can't dispute that...the cut tho...no clear evidence so u have to side with the call

That's exactly how it is. Whatever the call on the field I don't believe there was conclusive evidence to over turn. How it should be. None of this game management interpretive review nonsense.

comment_717184
8 hours ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

Not so much a stab in the back imo, more of a case of the Als needing to choose the more skilled or more promising player. 
 

Same with Adams, it’s not a stab in the back.  
 

Guy had a terrible game, then got hurt (like he always does). BC’s trying for a home GC. If I was a Lions fan, I’d be livid if they passed on Rourke because of “loyalty” to VA. 

Pro sports is a business. It does suck sometimes. 

40 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

That's exactly how it is. Whatever the call on the field I don't believe there was conclusive evidence to over turn. How it should be. None of this game management interpretive review nonsense.

Cryder fans being cryders. As Roy Kent would say, "*****"!!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment