Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 160
  • Views 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • voodoochylde
    voodoochylde

  • There was space between foot and sideline when he placed his foot...that was clear and undisputeable...when he cut to the inside..it looked like the green had disappeared and possibly his foot touched

  • rebusrankin
    rebusrankin

    Alexander wasn't out, I mean on the replay he's mm away but there was still green between his foot and the out of bounds line.

comment_717106
17 minutes ago, greenrider55 said:

You may have turned a corner, you may not have. Collaros needs to get his crap together asap. Stats may be for losers, but it’s going to be difficult for the D to win every game necessary when Zach is struggling.

well good news! Collaros has been getting his crap together... He's cut out a lot of the stupid **** was was getting into trouble with early in the year AND he's getting his #1 guy in Kenny Lawler back as well!

Again go back to that Toronto game, Collars was good in that game, the pick was PI that the CFL botched (they even admitted as much afterwards). Bombers lost that game because of turnovers, had nothing to do with Collaros on any of them besided the obviously botched command centre PI decision.Ā 

comment_717108
24 minutes ago, Booch said:

hat...1 td given up in last 3 games....35 points?....sounds like a top defence to me running 3 games in a row now...no?

ever since Garbutt got back. Having 2 proper DEs changed the D in such a good way. Throw in the rookie/young dbs settling in it's not just an out of the blue couple game thing.Ā 

comment_717112
2 minutes ago, IC Khari said:

If they had given the Ruders that pick in the last 30 seconds, the ALS would have got the same treatment we did in Toronto. That’s how bad that Argo call was 😔

How in the f could an on field ref ā€œseeā€ that the incomplete pass was an interception? How in the f could a legitimate football fan agree that was an interception?Ā 

Edited by Rod Black

comment_717114
9 minutes ago, Rod Black said:

How in the f could an on field ref ā€œseeā€ that the incomplete pass was an interception? How in the f could a legitimate football fan agree that was an interception?Ā 

Tell that to the Bombers, we not only had a brutal pick call in Toronto, but in Calgary for the first game with the Stumps as well. Coincidentally we lose both games by less than a td Ā šŸ™ƒ

Edited by IC Khari

comment_717118
4 minutes ago, greenrider55 said:

https://x.com/LeeMac19871611/status/1824668309683605854

It would appear the fearless command center has once again made their mark.

was his foot off the ground though? You can see his foot coming up in that clip. I saw that live but it's just too close to make that judgement to over turn it when it was ruled in bounds on the field. The plant came down inbounds, so either his foot slid sideways or it only appeared to go out when he picked his foot up. Can you make the determination based on the angle there? That's why it wasn't over turned.Ā 

comment_717119

The incompetence of the command center is astounding.Ā  Just remember the 2021 west final with McSpitty Williams catch that clearly hit the turf but somehow was confirmed and allowed the Cryders to continue.

How the hell are these idiots still employed?Ā  Ā And let's not.forget the shitshow last week in Ottawa.

Anyways love to see the L on the riders as it keeps the Bombers within striking distance.Ā  Looking forward to Sunday.

comment_717121
Just now, captaincanuck12 said:

The incompetence of the command center is astounding.Ā  Just remember the 2021 west final with McSpitty Williams catch that clearly hit the turf but somehow was confirmed and allowed the Cryders to continue.

How the hell are these idiots still employed?Ā  Ā And let's not.forget the shitshow last week in Ottawa.

Anyways love to see the L on the riders as it keeps the Bombers within striking distance.Ā  Looking forward to Sunday.

You'll find most Rider fans agree with the 2021 WF Duke catch too, it just wasn't lol.

1 minute ago, 17to85 said:

was his foot off the ground though? You can see his foot coming up in that clip. I saw that live but it's just too close to make that judgement to over turn it when it was ruled in bounds on the field. The plant came down inbounds, so either his foot slid sideways or it only appeared to go out when he picked his foot up. Can you make the determination based on the angle there? That's why it wasn't over turned.Ā 

I think it's pretty clear he slides onto the white while still making contact with the turf. Unless somehow the CC didn't have that angle, which at this point wouldn't surprise me.

comment_717125
15 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

was his foot off the ground though? You can see his foot coming up in that clip. I saw that live but it's just too close to make that judgement to over turn it when it was ruled in bounds on the field. The plant came down inbounds, so either his foot slid sideways or it only appeared to go out when he picked his foot up. Can you make the determination based on the angle there? That's why it wasn't over turned.Ā 

The guidance that the CC was given was to only overturn if it was clear and obvious, and if they have to slow it down to a single frame, that's going too far.Ā  In the moment, I thought he stayed in, on the replay in the highlights, it looked like his foot may have slipped sideways as he pushed off.Ā  I think that whichever call was made on the field was going to be confirmed because it wasn't clear and obvious, so the TD stood.

comment_717127
45 minutes ago, greenrider55 said:

I think it's pretty clear he slides onto the white while still making contact with the turf. Unless somehow the CC didn't have that angle, which at this point wouldn't surprise me.

but you aren't listening.... pretty clear isn't the standard, they needed to see a shot where you can definitively say his foot did slide out before it was off the ground. Did you see that? No you didn't because it didn't exist. Had they ruled him out in real time it would have held up to challenge as well because there's nothing conclusive there. The command centre not over turning stuff like this is entirely different than some of the blatant wrong calls they've made in recent weeks.Ā 

This one was simple insufficient evidence to over turn the call on the field. Which is what the standard was originally supposed to be.

Create an account or sign in to comment