1 minute ago, JCon said:

Yes. You get one and if you're successful you get a second. If you're the Riders, they'll probably call everything your way anyhow. 

I knew that, but that was sasks 3rd challenge. 

Why did he throw that???

Throwing it up for grabs doesn't give you a long career

You have got to be kidding me...

Its time to admit that Streveler's arm strength/mechanics are a problem.

Just now, SpeedFlex27 said:

Why did he throw that???

Cuz Fgs aint gonna do it

1 minute ago, Floyd said:

I like Petermann but we are missing Woli's blocking...

Like I said, I hope Woli, Gray and Roh are actually hurt and not just scratches

Not sure if any or all would have made a difference in this game.

Killer turnover #3

Ugh. Just stop throwing. Run everything until the whistle blows at the end of the game. Yuck. 

1 Bomber and 3 sask players.  Not good odds there Strev.

 

guess we know why lapo didn't call many deep passes.

I apologize.

so, kind of looks like the Bombers still haven't found a second string qb.

Edited October 6, 20196 yr by Mark F

6 minutes ago, Sard said:

I knew that, but that was sasks 3rd challenge. 

2nd. 

Just now, Goalie said:

Cuz Fgs aint gonna do it

Neither are picks in the end zone & goal line.

man, where did our team go?

Streveler doesn't throw he slings 

Look at the difference between these games...  Montreal and Calgary's receivers fighting for the ball... high pointing - outcompeting

Demski waiting for it...  two interception with him as a target....  Whitehead not finishing routes now...  Lawler not targeted

 

Is there any reason why demolish is the only one he throws long to? That is 3 isn’t it ?

Streveler is a **** qb. Thank God this debate can end. 

I mean, there really is no excuse for that. 

7 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Cuz Fgs aint gonna do it

Well, three turnovers in FG range. 

Love watching Alexander at safety though

1 minute ago, White Out said:

Streveler is a **** qb. Thank God this debate can end. 

Then I guess we have no QBs then. Not a great situation. 

1 minute ago, JCon said:

Well, three turnovers in FG range. 

That’s a lead. 

I guess we do want Nichols back next year after all. Or should we go after Masoli or Arbuckle (not that we will). 

Just now, AKAChip said:

Then I guess we have no QBs then. Not a great situation. 

I posted early in the thread that we should send Hamilton whatever they want for Evans.

On a larger level, I think it's time that we totally tore everything down and rebuild from scratch. And I mean everything.