2 hours ago, do or die said:

Stamps receivers were total junk in that one.   Drops, fumbles and plays not made.   Cats won't win a beauty contest with that one, but the deal is finding ways to win, and collect the points.

Hamilton and us in many respects have many similarities that cause big wins.  Playmaker WRs, defenses that force turnovers, and special teams return beasts.  Multiple ways of beating you.

But where we do got the edge over Hamilton is ...

Nichols >> Masoli

A Harris > Sean Thomas-Erlington/Irons

Money Medlock > Lunker Lirim

 

Hence why we beat them in the Grey Cup

2 hours ago, USABomberfan said:

Hamilton and us in many respects have many similarities that cause big wins.  Playmaker WRs, defenses that force turnovers, and special teams return beasts.  Multiple ways of beating you.

But where we do got the edge over Hamilton is ...

Nichols >> Masoli

A Harris > Sean Thomas-Erlington/Irons

Money Medlock > Lunker Lirim

 

Hence why we beat them in the Grey Cup

Especially if Bad Masoli shows up. He always seems to bring his Michael Bishop A game against us.

So does this mean Montreal is better than Hamilton and Calgary?

51 minutes ago, J5V said:

So does this mean Montreal is better than Hamilton and Calgary?

No, though I do think they don't get the credit they deserve as an improved team.  I still think in spite of Masoli and Hajrallahu's problems, Hamilton is still better rounded than MTL, but the Als should finish 2nd ahead of the smoke and mirrors Redblacks

Well actually take that back, MTL may be as good maybe better than CGY, though it depends on V Adams.  He's a better scrambler than Arbuckle, but I don't know about a better passer.  Should be interesting when those 2 teams play.

Arbuckle played a very strong game but his receivers stunk all night. Especially Rogers.  Ambles made some stupid plays as well. The Stamps Special Teams were Jekyll & Hyde all game long.  Had a chance to bury the Cats early but let it get away.