Riders are toast in this one.

They have a great defense that will win you some championships, BUT you still need some kind of offence.

Sask offence has been almost non-existent in this game, as well as most of the last.

 

1 minute ago, TheSource said:

Good players like Gainey will take risks to potentially make a bigger impact to their team, but if it backfires, it can end up costing the team.

Playing aggressive and taking risks can work to generate big plays, but you can also give up big plays. That is the double-edge of the sword.

 

The opposite can be said and be equally true... Playing it safe will have a big impact on the team, if it backfires, it can end up costing the team. 

Playing passively and taking few risks can work to prevent big plays, but you can also give up big plays. 

 

I too can throw a bunch of words together and not say anything at all. 

3 minutes ago, TheSource said:

Good players like Gainey will take risks to potentially make a bigger impact to their team, but if it backfires, it can end up costing the team.

Playing aggressive and taking risks can work to generate big plays, but you can also give up big plays. That is the double-edge of the sword.

 

He might make that strip 1 out of a 100 attempts in that situation against a pro RB running to daylight.  That was a really stupid risk to take.

Just now, JuranBoldenRules said:

He might make that strip 1 out of a 100 attempts in that situation against a pro RB running to daylight.  That was a really stupid risk to take.

Well, good for him.

 

I love watching the Riders struggle. It's so envigorating.

Suitor sure wants the Riders to win this challenge

Melon Head dead in the stands.

Well colour me surprised 

Just now, SpeedFlex27 said:

Suitor sure wants the Riders to win this challenge

Just enough. Suitor is seldom wrong.

 

Pretty weak

Bullshit call. 

Roughing the passer.

 

Ottawa gets called for NOT hitting Collaros.

The call from the league took some time to get to the ref .................let the flags fly

Heres the game.

Clutch QBing there.

So, if you don't hit someone how is that rough play? 

1 minute ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

Ottawa gets called for NOT hitting Collaros.

He did hit him in the head (from the last angle they showed). He tried to avoid him but he still made contact wayyyy past the sideline. 

Just now, TheSource said:

Heres the game.

Clutch QBing there.

No clutch officiating. 

2 minutes ago, TheSource said:

Heres the game.

 

 

I don't think you call it clutch when you finally show up to a game, late in the 4th quarter. Making a play in the first quarter is as valuable as the fourth. 

 

Unless you're also calling Nichols late TD against the Stamps clutch? 

Edited September 16, 20187 yr by JCon

Ottawa will lose this challenge

**** these refs!!

1 minute ago, bustamente said:

The call from the league took some time to get to the ref .................let the flags fly

 

As it should for Canada's Team.

Good for the league that a small market like Sask can produce a top-tier product on the field year after year.

It would behoove the Bombers to learn from their model.

 

1 minute ago, TheSource said:

 

As it should for Canada's Team.

Good for the league that a small market like Sask can produce a top-tier product on the field year after year.

It would behoove the Bombers to learn from their model.

 

Year after year? 

Green getting all the calls...

What a bunch of garbage. No safety... Was that cover 0? Why would Thorpe run a Cover 0?