3 hours ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Some of us have actual jobs and are more concerned with paying bills than the outcome of a random hockey game, but I'll get right on that for you, my Highness.

3 hours ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

Some of us have actual jobs and are more concerned with paying bills than the outcome of a random hockey game, but I'll get right on that for you, my Highness.

8 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Would be the same for both teams.

For sure. Nashville was a bit sluggish also. Jets controlled the play last game as the fancy stats say... Just high danger shots weren't as high as normal

8 minutes ago, Goalie said:

For sure. Nashville was a bit sluggish also. Jets controlled the play last game as the fancy stats say... Just high danger shots weren't as high as normal

Which stats are those?  They generated less than half a dozen good scoring chances, Nashville D were usually allowed to take their sweet time in their own zone, and when a Jet did fore-check, they arrived too late to make an impact.  They are the best fore-checking team I've seen in years, but they didn't show up for game 6, game 4, and the first period of game 5.

"There are lies, damn lies, and statistics."

Jets controlled play last game. Nashville played ok.. Rinne was really good tho. The fancy stats dont lie. Follow Murat on the Athletic... Really solid twitter follow. 

1 hour ago, Goalie said:

Jets controlled play last game. Nashville played ok.. Rinne was really good tho. The fancy stats dont lie. Follow Murat on the Athletic... Really solid twitter follow. 

Rinne made very few difficult saves - that was obvious