Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 120
  • Views 8.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I take this as... Medlock puts up one FG, which, by itself, is enough to beat the TiCats but that the offence still puts up over 500 yards and bunch of TDs.

  • Bomberfan85
    Bomberfan85

    Lol! "We all know what the problems are but do the Bombers themselves?". I'm about to make up a word. That's the most forumy thing I could have possibly read.

  • deepsixemtoboyd
    deepsixemtoboyd

    Tonight's outcome was hardly shocking.  All season long a very steady, effective, if unspectacular offence led by a quarterback with who is certainly the best, statistically speaking, in the CFL this

comment_296598
1 minute ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

Disagree. DB's are playing 5-10 yards off in prevent, you should be able to hit guys at will on quick hitters. He was under/over throwing guys all over the field.

Ya if you want to go 6 yards at a time when you need 3 scores.

Thought his accuracy was alright considering the situation.  Had a couple he didn’t step into when the pocket was in his lap but otherwise fairly accurate.  At least 3 drops.  Decent mobility but had his eyes in the rush sometimes so might have missed someone coming open downfield on scrambles.

Edited by JuranBoldenRules

comment_296613

The reasons the Bombers lost this game so badly are simple, and none of them relate to Nichols being injured. Their O-line mauled the Bomber vaunted D-line who got little pressure on Masoli. Their D-line and blitzes confused and dominated what was supposed to be one of if not the best O-line in the league. Their receivers were open way too much, and  the Cats were able to run up the middle at will and get 8-15 yards every damned time. Simple and fatal. If Hall isn't responsible, who is? Who is still saying that we can give up 350+ yards every game and still win?

comment_296618
4 minutes ago, tracker said:

The reasons the Bombers lost this game so badly are simple, and none of them relate to Nichols being injured. Their O-line mauled the Bomber vaunted D-line who got little pressure on Masoli. Their D-line and blitzes confused and dominated what was supposed to be one of if not the best O-line in the league. Their receivers were open way too much, and  the Cats were able to run up the middle at will and get 8-15 yards every damned time. Simple and fatal. If Hall isn't responsible, who is? Who is still saying that we can give up 350+ yards every game and still win?

Nobody talks about the talent or lack thereof on the defense.  That is on the scouts and GM.  Hurl is the worst MLB in the league.

Davis looked pretty bad at QB against the prevent.  Barely moved the ball and only got 3 points in the half.  If he starts next week the Bombers are dead barring a tonne of turnovers by the d.  Probably the worst backup or one of the worst backups at this point.  Bridge in Sask looked much better and that is with a team that supposedly has inferior talent.

comment_296620
Just now, blueandgoldguy said:

Nobody talks about the talent or lack thereof on the defense.  That is on the scouts and GM.  Hurl is the worst MLB in the league.

Davis looked pretty bad at QB against the prevent.  Barely moved the ball and only got 3 points in the half.  If he starts next week the Bombers are dead barring a tonne of turnovers by the d.  Probably the worst backup or one of the worst backups at this point.  Bridge in Sask looked much better and that is with a team that supposedly has inferior talent.

Could it be that Davis looked bad (at least partially) because the team had collectively thrown in the towel at that point?

comment_296621

Ignoring the run game in October when its windy and chilly is just asking for trouble. What do u expect from Davis when Nichols was struggling also. We had absolutely zero run game.. Harris and Flanders were MIA from the opening whistle. When the other team knows u arent running.. This is what happens. Totally shitty game plan by the O and D. 

Edited by Goalie

comment_296626

Irving and Brown pretty tough on the D. Mentioned the 14 play 9 minute 105 yard drive. D was bad. Hard not to lose your fight when that happens. Irving actually called the D soft. My guess... If Hamilton doesnt score on the opening drive of the 2nd half... Nichols plays. They did and ate the clock big time... Hamilton had the ball for 2/3rds of the game.. Its not cuz our O was bad.. They weren't good tho.. But it was cuz our D couldnt stop ****. 

Edited by Goalie

Create an account or sign in to comment