Ripple effect could be ugly...

Morrissey back with Buff makes Morrissey worse.

Myers-Enstrom back to PK duty

Chiarot-Poolman at 10-12 mins a game... yikes.

Kulikov expected back soon. 

37 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Kulikov expected back soon. 

Probably just bumps Chiarot down...

7 hours ago, Goalie said:

Uh oh 

 

 

this is not good news

Time for Byfuglien to step it up and earn his keep. He said he wanted more minutes, right? Well, here they come.

I have to think Chevy wont stand pat.  Even if its just a 6/7 veteran.  Too many injuries on D to be comfortable right now.

39 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

I have to think Chevy wont stand pat.  Even if its just a 6/7 veteran.  Too many injuries on D to be comfortable right now.

Agreed.  We're too good this year to rely on just the folks we have and hope it works out.

Morrissey - Buff

Enstrom - Myers

Kulivov - Poolman

If Kulikov's good to go this week, we're in decent shape short term.   What worries me, and I'm sure the Jets, 6-8 week injury gets pretty close to playoff time.  And this ain't Scheifele healing a shoulder, where you know player will stay in shape. 

11 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said:

Agreed.  We're too good this year to rely on just the folks we have and hope it works out.

Morrissey - Buff

Enstrom - Myers

Kulivov - Poolman

If Kulikov's good to go this week, we're in decent shape short term.   What worries me, and I'm sure the Jets, 6-8 week injury gets pretty close to playoff time.  And this ain't Scheifele healing a shoulder, where you know player will stay in shape. 

They have one month til the trade deadline so they can take a little time to see what happens.  If anything, a fresh Trouba for the playoffs will be a good thing.

Buff Morrissey 

Myers Kulikov

Poolman Enstrom 

 

 

AFAIK, pairings today were:

Morrissey- Myers

Enstrom-Buff

Chiarot-Poolman

Just now, JCon said:

AFAIK, pairings today were:

Morrissey- Myers

Enstrom-Buff

Chiarot-Poolman

Sounds about right, with Kulikov taking Chiarot's spot for the game, hopefully.

Just now, The Unknown Poster said:

Sounds about right, with Kulikov taking Chiarot's spot for the game, hopefully.

I'm not sure if you play Chiarot and Kulikov together and rely on the veterans or if you give Poolman a chance next to Kulikov.

 

The gambler in me says K-P. But my head says K-C.

1 hour ago, JCon said:

I'm not sure if you play Chiarot and Kulikov together and rely on the veterans or if you give Poolman a chance next to Kulikov.

 

The gambler in me says K-P. But my head says K-C.

I think thats the plan once Kulikov ready to go. Could even see the pairs i posted above once Kuli ready. I think its Poolman Kuli once Kuli ready to go. Chia sits. 

Edited January 29, 20188 yr by Goalie

MacKinnon listed as day-to-day, won't play tomorrow in Edmonton: https://www.milehighhockey.com/2018/1/31/16954772/colorado-avalanche-lose-nathan-mackinnon-to-upper-body-shoulder-injury

Big loss for the Avalanche.

Scheif on the ice this morning. Kulikov puts on the contact jersey.

I have him in my pool

 

That's a big loss for the Avalanche.

1 minute ago, blue_gold_84 said:

That's a big loss for the Avalanche.

A lot of people had him first for the Hart.

10 minutes ago, JCon said:

A lot of people had him first for the Hart.

He's been unreal this season.

Some good news regarding Steve Mason:

And Kulikov looks to be back on Saturday vs. the Avs:

 

Just now, blue_gold_84 said:

He's been unreal this season.

especially when compared to his last several mediocre seasons... 

 

14 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said:

especially when compared to his last several mediocre seasons... 

 

Surgically removing the cancer from their room made that team a lot healthier, especially MacKinnon...

24 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said:

especially when compared to his last several mediocre seasons... 

MacKinnon and mediocre don't belong in the same sentence. He's been one of the bright spots on a pretty lousy team since he was drafted.

26 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said:

MacKinnon and mediocre don't belong in the same sentence. He's been one of the bright spots on a pretty lousy team since he was drafted.

Different strokes for different folks.  He's a great player, don't get me wrong.   

But I do think it's fair to ask if production has always matched skill level.   His best year statistically was his first.  Avs also won the division that year.  Since then, you're right, pretty lousy Avs team.  And in turn, just an "okay" Nathan MacKinnon??  A "pretty good" Nathan MacKinnon.  A mediocore Nathan MacKinnon?   

At 20 G & 50 pts per season, given his talent, I don't think mediocre is that egregious.   It's just naturally high expectations for a 1st overall.   How would he describe his last few season's, leaving aside the team's play? 

I've watched the Avs downfall pretty closely, being a diehard fan before the Jets returned and all... 

10 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said:

Different strokes for different folks.  He's a great player, don't get me wrong.   

But I do think it's fair to ask if production has always matched skill level.   His best year statistically was his first.  Avs also won the division that year.  Since then, you're right, pretty lousy Avs team.  And in turn, just an "okay" Nathan MacKinnon??  A "pretty good" Nathan MacKinnon.  A mediocore Nathan MacKinnon?   

At 20 G & 50 pts per season, given his talent, I don't think mediocre is that egregious.   It's just naturally high expectations for a 1st overall.   How would he describe his last few season's, leaving aside the team's play? 

I've watched the Avs downfall pretty closely, being a diehard fan before the Jets returned and all... 

He averages .77 PPG career, the exact same as one Mark Scheifele who's also played on some pretty lousy Jets teams. I wouldn't qualify Scheifele as mediocre. Would you?