Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_471847
8 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

There is no good reason for the public to own firearms whose only design purpose is to kill people. Yes, anyone could use a hunting rifle to go on a killing spree, but sociologically, getting rid of people-killing guns causes a shift in public consciousness forĀ the better, as the Australian example shows.

  • Replies 10k
  • Views 754k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • JohnnyAbonny
    JohnnyAbonny

    The holocaust comparisons have me legit sick to my stomach. There is not one thing in Canada going on right now that compares to the start of the holocaust. No red flags. Not a one. They built the f

  • It was required to clear the protesters... If that's done, the emergency is over and they don't need it anymore.Ā  I actually think it's really good that their revoking it so quickly.Ā  Takes away

  • As a residential school survivor I will share my opinion. There really is no way of making reparations for this sad chapter. It must be acknowledged, remembered, but MOST importantly the effects it ha

comment_471868
3 hours ago, Tracker said:

There is no good reason for the public to own firearms whose only design purpose is to kill people. Yes, anyone could use a hunting rifle to go on a killing spree, but sociologically, getting rid of people-killing guns causes a shift in public consciousness forĀ the better, as the Australian example shows.

Using this type of gun for hunting is not a viable excuse either, if you need to use a mock-machine gun to kill a deer, the deer deserves to live another day.

comment_471903

In regards to mock machine guns.
Its a unique type of hunting rifle specifically designed to hunt mockingbirds during open season in, what has affectionately been dubbed Mocktober.

If you don’t believe me, just ask me, I have all the answers.

And some of them are right.

I could be president.

Edited by Mr Dee

comment_471923
1 hour ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

Prentendie, made for pretendie warriors.

NINTCHDBPICT000577306889.jpg?w=670

I love(? Maybe not the right word) that these type of people think they'd stand even the slightest chance against the government if it decided to go rogue and attack the people. Enjoy shooting those fancy rifles at drones and missiles.

I also get a chuckle out the guys who do their best Chris Farley, fat man in a tiny jack routine but in bullet proof vest instead.

Edited by Bigblue204

  • Author
comment_472120
12 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

Couple problems with this, what is a ā€œmilitary grade assault rifleā€? Ā And who now determines market value for the guns.Ā 

I suspect the government knows on both counts. Ā And anyway market value is whatever they are gracious enough to pay you for an illegal weapon. Ā  A gun person can always opt not to take the money and take the charges instead lolĀ 

comment_472122
4 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

I suspect the government knows on both counts. Ā And anyway market value is whatever they are gracious enough to pay you for an illegal weapon. Ā  A gun person can always opt not to take the money and take the charges instead lolĀ 

The government uses that term, but it’s a broad term that they don’t define. The guns that are used in the military, which would be automatic, are already prohibited in Canada.Ā 

  • Author
comment_472123
4 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

The government uses that term, but it’s a broad term that they don’t define. The guns that are used in the military, which would be automatic, are already prohibited in Canada.Ā 

Yeah. I’m sure more info will come. Ā Probably semi automatic too. Hand guns etc. Ā No guns allowed. Ā 

comment_472126
46 minutes ago, Mr Dee said:

Trade in all your guns...and get life size Nerf Guns for every one turned in. 🤪

Offer toilet paper in return. Fair value.

40 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

Couple problems with this, what is a ā€œmilitary grade assault rifleā€? Ā And who now determines market value for the guns.Ā 

It kinda helps that weapons such as the AR15 are sold as "military grade assault rifle" in the description :P

13 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

So ban all guns? I believe that’s bad policy.

You just have to look south to see what happens when you have an open policy on guns.

For full disclosure. I'm also anti-gun.

comment_472127
42 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

The government uses that term, but it’s a broad term that they don’t define. The guns that are used in the military, which would be automatic, are already prohibited in Canada.Ā 

"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau today announcedĀ a ban on some 1,500 makes and models of military-grade "assault-style" weapons in Canada, effective immediately.

Starting today, licensed gun owners will no longer be allowed to sell, transport, import or use these sorts of weapons in this country.

Ā 

"As of today, the market for assault weapons in Canada is closed," Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said. "Enough is enough. Banning these firearms will save Canadian lives."

Trudeau saidĀ there will be a two-year amnesty period to allow people who already own these firearms to comply with the ban. Trudeau promised to pass legislation in the coming months to provide "fair compensation" to people who own these firearms."

"The term "assault-style" has noĀ legal definitionĀ in Canada. The Firearms Act also does not currently classify firearms as "military-style" — that term would have to be defined in the new regulations.

Generally speaking, an assault-style weapon is a semi-automatic firearm with a large ammunitionĀ magazine, built to fire quickly."

Ā 

"Radio-Canada obtained an early draft of a list of firearms that will be included in that 1,500 figure. GunsĀ like the M16, M4, AR-10 and AR-15 rifles will be banned; those styles were used in the Sandy Hook, New Zealand, Las Vegas and Orlando mass shootings. There are an estimated 83,572 of them in Canada.

The Ruger Mini-14, the type of firearm used in the Ɖcole Polytechnique shooting, is also on the list. There are an estimated 16,859 of them in Canada.

The M14 rifle, used in the Moncton shooting, is also expected to be banned. There are an estimated 5,229 of those in Canada."

Ā 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-gun-control-measures-ban-1.5552131

Edited by Throw Long Bannatyne

comment_472128
7 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

Offer toilet paper in return. Fair value.

It kinda helps that weapons such as the AR15 are sold as "military grade assault rifle" in the description :P

You just have to look south to see what happens when you have an open policy on guns.

For full disclosure. I'm also anti-gun.

The ā€œAR-15ā€ is just a style of the gun. Canada does not have an open policy onĀ gun. The laws that are in place are actually pretty good. With having different classes for guns, non-restricted, restricted, and prohibited. What needs to change is the enforcement of laws. Control at boarders needs to happen to not allow illegal guns to enter.Ā 

  • Author
comment_472131
1 hour ago, Tiny759 said:

So ban all guns? I believe that’s bad policy.

Obviously thats not the case and its the same silly argument that erupts in the US.Ā  If they take my tank, my shoulder mounted missile launcher, my grenades, my M-16 and the 10 million rounds of ammo, they'll come for my hunting rifle next.Ā  Thats not an issue in Canada.Ā  But guns are not needed for anything outside of hunting (and Ill defer on the argument of personal protection).Ā  Fortunately, in Canada, we havent wrapped ourselves up in misunderstanding very old amendment into making guns a culture thing.

But yeah, no guns (outside of hunting).Ā Ā 

  • Author
comment_472133
37 minutes ago, Tiny759 said:

The ā€œAR-15ā€ is just a style of the gun. Canada does not have an open policy onĀ gun. The laws that are in place are actually pretty good. With having different classes for guns, non-restricted, restricted, and prohibited. What needs to change is the enforcement of laws. Control at boarders needs to happen to not allow illegal guns to enter.Ā 

No, what needs to change is not just control at borders, which ofcourse, illegal guns should be prevented from coming in.Ā  But there is zero need for any of the weapons mentioned in the post above.Ā  Thats the answer to your earlier question.Ā  Do you need an AR-15 or similar weapon?Ā  If you do, you dont anymore because they're now banned.

comment_472137
7 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Obviously thats not the case and its the same silly argument that erupts in the US.Ā  If they take my tank, my shoulder mounted missile launcher, my grenades, my M-16 and the 10 million rounds of ammo, they'll come for my hunting rifle next.Ā  Thats not an issue in Canada.Ā  But guns are not needed for anything outside of hunting (and Ill defer on the argument of personal protection).Ā  Fortunately, in Canada, we havent wrapped ourselves up in misunderstanding very old amendment into making guns a culture thing.

But yeah, no guns (outside of hunting).Ā Ā 

One amendment, fat people don't need to hunt.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.