4 minutes ago, Zontar said:

Please. If you have an implicit political bias, never mind an overt one, would mean you are biased and therefore unsuitable to enusure a fair trial. This is basic common law here.

Oh cool- I had no clue, can you point me to the section where jury selection deals with that please. I am not that well versed in Law. I don't think there is such a rule, but I am open to being wrong- please show me.

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by wanna-b-fanboy

Just now, Zontar said:

Please. If you have an implicit political bias, never mind an overt one, would mean you are biased and therefore unsuitable to enusure a fair trial. This is basic common law here.

Thats absurd.   But it's telling.  An alt-right person assumed that a Democrat would instinctively and maliciously screw a Republican even when sworn to be impartial.  And that Alt Right person feels that way because its how they would act.  Intriguing.  Its really like how Trump always accuses people of doing what he has done.  Its fascinating.

If you removed Democrats.....and Republicans from all juries.....for potential bias....you would have a mighty small jury pool, for everything. 

Just now, do or die said:

.....and we know that is not happening

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by do or die

10 minutes ago, do or die said:

If you removed Democrats.....and Republicans from all juries.....for potential bias....you would have a mighty small jury pool, for everything. 

Come on. That’s ridiculous. No one suggested removing Democrats and Republicans.  
 

Just remove Democrats.    

Challenging jurors for bias is the responsibility of the defence counsel.

If Stone doesn't have adequate representation, that's his problem. Dude is rich and can afford whatever attorneys he wants. He apparently picked poorly. 

It's just like a right winger to want the state to insulate people from the impact of their choices.

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by johnzo

1 hour ago, Zontar said:

Please. If you have an implicit political bias, never mind an overt one, would mean you are biased and therefore unsuitable to enusure a fair trial. This is basic common law here.

Still waiting on your explanation of the million illegal votes, btw.

2 minutes ago, johnzo said:

Still waiting on your explanation of the million illegal votes, btw.

It was 3 million, and they were all biased.

4 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said:

You know this is a lie, right?  Are you suggesting that had Cohen named Trump, that you would agree Trump is a criminal, should be charged with a felony and removed from office?  

If Cohen HAD named Trump then Trump would be named as a co-conspirator even if he couldn't be charged. Cohen didn't name him, so Trump can't be named as a co-conspirator in the crime, that is what the law says and what was discussed at length when Cohen rolled over on him. Now do you see the difference? Once again false news making **** up that never happened. 

3 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Except that's not all they dug up... why do you ignore that? That's even with the White House with the aid of the DOJ and Senate Republicans prevent witnesses from talking... 

 

So I say again, stand up and pull your head out of your ass.

That's funny I don't recall the articles of impeachment charging him any specific crime? You have been reading false news again. 

3 minutes ago, pigseye said:

If Cohen HAD named Trump then Trump would be named as a co-conspirator even if he couldn't be charged. Cohen didn't name him, so Trump can't be named as a co-conspirator in the crime, that is what the law says and what was discussed at length when Cohen rolled over on him. Now do you see the difference? Once again false news making **** up that never happened. 

Actually he named Trump in sworn testimony.  And it was detailed in his case.

There was never any doubt that “Individual 1” was President Donald Trump. But now, in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee Wednesday, Cohen has confirmed it.

“I pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with ‘Individual 1,’” Cohen said, reading from his prepared statement. “And for the record: ‘Individual 1’ is Donald J. Trump.”

Now, do you understand?

 

Just now, pigseye said:

That's funny I don't recall the articles of impeachment charging him any specific crime? You have been reading false news again. 

Just because you dont know how impeachment works, thats not any one else's fault.

Just now, The Unknown Poster said:

Just because you dont know how impeachment works, thats not any one else's fault.

He alleged there was a crime I asked him what it was, where's the problem? 

4 minutes ago, pigseye said:

He alleged there was a crime I asked him what it was, where's the problem? 

For starters, we know Trump committed crimes.  

Secondly, impeachment isnt a criminal trial.

Thirdly, what trump was charged with are violations of the constitution.  If you want to argue they dont actually fall under the criminal code, fine, but thats an obtuse argument to make.  He was charged with crimes against his oath and the constitution.  I mean sure, its not a BJ in the Oval office, but some people think bribery is a crime.

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by The Unknown Poster

2 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Actually he named Trump in sworn testimony.  And it was detailed in his case.

There was never any doubt that “Individual 1” was President Donald Trump. But now, in his testimony before the House Oversight Committee Wednesday, Cohen has confirmed it.

“I pled guilty in federal court to felonies for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in coordination with ‘Individual 1,’” Cohen said, reading from his prepared statement. “And for the record: ‘Individual 1’ is Donald J. Trump.”

Now, do you understand?

 

I googled that nothing comes up. 

Just now, The Unknown Poster said:

For starters, we know Trump committed crimes.  

Secondly, impeachment isnt a criminal trial.

Thirdly, what trump was charged with are violations of the constitution.  If you want to argue they dont actually fall under the criminal code, fine, but thats an obtuse argument to make.  He was charged with crimes against his oath and the constitution.  I mean sure, its not a BJ in the Oval office, but some people think bribery is a crime.

I'll ask again, what was the crime in the articles of impeachment he is referring too? 

9 minutes ago, pigseye said:

I googled that nothing comes up. 

then it must not be true.  

oh yeah, one more thing about jury bias -- dude was convicted by unanimous vote of all the jurors, as the English common law demands.  Which tells me that the jury was entirely composed of:

a) Soros clones grown in a secret Venezuelan lab

b) robolesbian deep state gun confiscators

c) members of the UN Permanent Committee On Baby Tissue Resale

d) those Portland pastors who provided sanctuary to Mexican Gender-Quaida

e) refugee lizards from Alpha Centauri

f) Socks Clinton

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by johnzo

God damn... I just got a trump re-election ad on the banner here at MBB

1 minute ago, wanna-b-fanboy said:

God damn... I just got a trump re-election ad on the banner here at MBB

You're probably one of the millions who illegally voted for Clinton in the last election. 

Evidence of the rest is coming any minute now I'm sure. 

22 minutes ago, pigseye said:

I googled that lack the ability to open source search online but I checked NoTricksZone and nothing comes up. 

There, fixed that for ya.

48 minutes ago, do or die said:

It was 3 million, and they were all biased.

BREAKING: MILLIONS OF DEMOCRATS LIVE IN UNITED STATES, PARTICIPATING FREELY IN ELECTIONS DESPITE OBVIOUS BIAS.

5 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said:

God damn... I just got a trump re-election ad on the banner here at MBB

Click on it a bunch.  If Trump wants to advertise in Canada, might as well redirect some of the marks' money to Rich.

Edited February 13, 20205 yr by johnzo

 

How dumb is trump when even his hand puppet Barr is like whoa hold the tweet train moron 

Bloomberg lol though. 

20 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

 

What a class act.  Does he still want the innocent Central Park guys executed?