Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 173
  • Views 14.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • we lost but it was a great game to see live.  that place went dead silent after our go ahead td.  so thrilling. I'm not even mad we lost.  we showed a lot of guts and we never gave up.

  • I wish we would've won that game just to rub in the face of the arrogant prick: Bo Levi Mitchell.

comment_225913
3 hours ago, J5V said:

I don't see why the Stamps would change their game plan much. It'll be lots of Messam until we demonstrate that we can stop him. 16 runs for 137 yards last time. At 6'3" and 263 LBs he is a load. Once you start to key on him it opens up Calgary's passing attack. If they get out to a massive lead like they did last time it could be over quick. If we can stuff Messam and let our ball hawks do their thing then we could be in good shape. The key is Messam.

Not much Messam so far - they are stopping him 

comment_225915
5 minutes ago, Stickem said:

Did we actually go to Cal. with the intention of winning this game...sure couldn't tell by that first half performance....What a stinker...We don't look like we care if we're playing or not...Guess we're not in the elite part of the league yet judging by this pathetic crap.

The truth is it looks like several other starts minus the turnovers 

comment_225926
22 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

If he hadn't touched it, it would have been no yards. The players who recovers for the 'dribbling team' has to be onside. 

Duane Ford just shot that theory down. Only considered a kick if it had gone out of bounds (according to Forde). If Calgary had touched it first they would have been penalized, but we touched it and did Calgary a huge solid. Adams should have just fallen on it. 

comment_225927
13 minutes ago, Brandon Blue&Gold said:

Duane Ford just shot that theory down. Only considered a kick if it had gone out of bounds (according to Forde). If Calgary had touched it first they would have been penalized, but we touched it and did Calgary a huge solid. Adams should have just fallen on it. 

Not a theory at all, that's the rule for a dribbled ball, which is what the call was. You have to be onside in order to recover a dribbled ball, which was negated when Adams touched it

Create an account or sign in to comment