Jump to content

Goalie

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Goalie

  1. It's cuz hall has them playing 5 to 10 yards off the receivers. It was pitch and catch last night all game long. Too easy for Collaros
  2. I'd try Washington at Sam. Move Randle back to corner. Sit Bucknor and start an American at hb
  3. Pretty tough to blame dbs when they are playing 5 to 10 yards off the receivers. That's a scheme thing
  4. Willy was by the tunnel. Probably didn't wanna cause a distraction
  5. Or there's always the fact that this isn't Richards first time. Stoll is not employed by them either.
  6. Goalie replied to Ducky's post in a topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
    Heard that and also he didn't want to sign with buffalo. Jets are high on him
  7. Ya pav had best save percentage of his career and Hutch played great so why bring Flaherty back.
  8. Firing a guy 2 games in to a season is crazy talk
  9. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I think there's lots of panic going on in this thread honestly. Willy got hurt buy b4 that the game was close. He went down and the team got rattled for sure. Calling for coaches heads or thinking Marve would have made a difference is crazy talk. I keep seeing brohm is just awful. He might be but the entire team was last night and Marve wouldn't have changed that. He might have provided a spark or maybe he would have got destroyed out there. Regardless we lost. Brohm Marve it's irrelevant when Collaros and the ticat O is slicing our D up like they were doing. Almost 1000 yards against our D in 2 games says it's not a willy brohm or Marve problem. Hurl was awful? Was it Hurl being beaten badly or our dbs who were playing 10 yards off? Did the ticats even run at Hurl?
  10. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I'd have liked to see Marve get some second half garbage time reps but I don't think it would have made any difference at all. He has potential it seems but... I feel he might have looked lost out there against that pressure D
  11. Yup. 21 points not on the d but still got owned
  12. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    U really think in a game where we were dominated Marve would have made a difference. Would I have played him? Yes but I really don't think the end result would have been different
  13. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    1-1 and blaming O'shea? Calling for a firing really? That's silly talk.
  14. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Lol. Such anger from you. It's pretty sad. 1-1 and the vultures come out. QB hurt and vultures come out. This place is crazy after a loss. Giddy after wins. Crazy after losses.
  15. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I'm not saying brohm is any good. I'm just saying he wasn't the reason we lost. Seems to be very little talk of the D getting lit up. I get it. We lost. We sucked but why not talk about the real reasons we lost instead of talking about a QB who does suck or firing coaches
  16. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    I'm being ridiculous? People calling for O'shea head and I'm being ridiculous. Whatever.
  17. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    They were getting shredded b4 willy got hurt too.
  18. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    No using the backs by MB either when willy went down or even b4. Brohm sucked but no way was he the reason we lost
  19. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    Was brohm REALLY the biggest problem? I mean maybe watched a different game but our D was shredded from start to finish. 56 points against. Ya 2 pick 6 really but the D is the concern. What would Marve have done? Probably nothing. The D sucks tho
  20. Goalie replied to IC Khari's post in a topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
    To move the ball but if the d can't stop the other team the QB is irrelevant
  21. 4 and 15 might be a reason
  22. The D is non existent. Brohm sucks too but the D can't stop the ticats at all.
  23. The D is awful
  24. The kings will keep him.
  25. First goes to Toronto in the Kessel deal